The Impact of Clinically Significant Pleural Effusion on Survival of US Veterans With Cancer, Congestive Heart Failure, and Pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003
Amit Chopra, Kurt Hu, Darren E Gemoets, Marc A Judson
{"title":"The Impact of Clinically Significant Pleural Effusion on Survival of US Veterans With Cancer, Congestive Heart Failure, and Pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study.","authors":"Amit Chopra, Kurt Hu, Darren E Gemoets, Marc A Judson","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous clinical data suggest that the presence of a pleural effusion is associated with poor survival. However, these studies were limited by either a small sample size or lack of an adequate control group.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>What is the impact of pleural effusion on survival in patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of the 3 most common causes of pleural effusion: cancer, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of US veterans hospitalized between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. International classification of disease codes were used to identify patients with an admitting diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, or cancer. Patients were dichotomized as having a clinically significant pleural effusion (PE) when a pleural effusion drainage was performed or not (NO-PE). All-cause mortality was compared between the PE and NO-PE cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 34,707 patients in the PE group and 792,217 patients in the NO-PE group. Patients with PE had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared with patients with NO-PE. The median survival time was significantly lower in PE group as compared with NO-PE group across all 3 diagnoses, CHF (PE, 1.51 years; 95% CI, 1.40-1.61 vs NO-PE, 3.23 years; 95% CI, 3.21-3.26), cancer (PE, 1.33 years; 95% CI, 1.27-1.39 vs NO-PE, 2.05 years; 95% CI, 2.02-2.08), and pneumonia (PE, 4.27 years; 95% CI, 3.94-4.61 vs NO-PE, 5.11 years; 95% CI, 5.06-5.15). The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with admitting diagnosis of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia. Clinicians and researchers should consider the association of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia with Pes when estimating the prognosis of individual patients and when assessing the survival of longitudinal cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous clinical data suggest that the presence of a pleural effusion is associated with poor survival. However, these studies were limited by either a small sample size or lack of an adequate control group.

Research questions: What is the impact of pleural effusion on survival in patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of the 3 most common causes of pleural effusion: cancer, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia?

Study design and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of US veterans hospitalized between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. International classification of disease codes were used to identify patients with an admitting diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, or cancer. Patients were dichotomized as having a clinically significant pleural effusion (PE) when a pleural effusion drainage was performed or not (NO-PE). All-cause mortality was compared between the PE and NO-PE cohorts.

Results: We analyzed 34,707 patients in the PE group and 792,217 patients in the NO-PE group. Patients with PE had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared with patients with NO-PE. The median survival time was significantly lower in PE group as compared with NO-PE group across all 3 diagnoses, CHF (PE, 1.51 years; 95% CI, 1.40-1.61 vs NO-PE, 3.23 years; 95% CI, 3.21-3.26), cancer (PE, 1.33 years; 95% CI, 1.27-1.39 vs NO-PE, 2.05 years; 95% CI, 2.02-2.08), and pneumonia (PE, 4.27 years; 95% CI, 3.94-4.61 vs NO-PE, 5.11 years; 95% CI, 5.06-5.15). The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.

Interpretation: The presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with admitting diagnosis of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia. Clinicians and researchers should consider the association of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia with Pes when estimating the prognosis of individual patients and when assessing the survival of longitudinal cohorts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信