Subin Lim, Ju Hyeon Kim, Seungmi Oh, Soon Jun Hong, Cheol Woong Yu, Hyung Joon Joo, Yong Hyun Kim, Eung Ju Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients","authors":"Subin Lim, Ju Hyeon Kim, Seungmi Oh, Soon Jun Hong, Cheol Woong Yu, Hyung Joon Joo, Yong Hyun Kim, Eung Ju Kim","doi":"10.1111/jch.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chlorthalidone (CLTD) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are widely used thiazide diuretics for hypertension management. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of patients treated with CLTD versus HCTZ. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Korea University Medical Center, derived from electronic health records. A total of 14 257 hypertensive patients treated with either CLTD (<i>n</i> = 1920) or HCTZ (<i>n</i> = 12 337) were identified. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores, resulting in 1606 patients in each treatment group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and safety profiles were analyzed. Baseline characteristics after propensity score matching were well balanced between the two groups. The average age was 61.8 ± 14.6 years for CLTD users, with 59.3% being male. The 3-year MACE occurred in 1.2% of the CLTD group compared with 1.4% of the HCTZ group (hazard ratio 0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.77). For secondary outcomes, cardiovascular mortality was 0.2% in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.92). Myocardial infarction occurred in 0.3% of CLTD users and 0.4% of HCTZ users (<i>p</i> = 0.65). The incidence of hypokalemia was 19.2% in the CLTD group versus 16.7% in the HCTZ group (<i>p</i> = 0.07). In conclusion, in hypertensive patients, CLTD and HCTZ showed comparable cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chlorthalidone (CLTD) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are widely used thiazide diuretics for hypertension management. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of patients treated with CLTD versus HCTZ. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Korea University Medical Center, derived from electronic health records. A total of 14 257 hypertensive patients treated with either CLTD (n = 1920) or HCTZ (n = 12 337) were identified. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores, resulting in 1606 patients in each treatment group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and safety profiles were analyzed. Baseline characteristics after propensity score matching were well balanced between the two groups. The average age was 61.8 ± 14.6 years for CLTD users, with 59.3% being male. The 3-year MACE occurred in 1.2% of the CLTD group compared with 1.4% of the HCTZ group (hazard ratio 0.91, p = 0.77). For secondary outcomes, cardiovascular mortality was 0.2% in both groups (p = 0.92). Myocardial infarction occurred in 0.3% of CLTD users and 0.4% of HCTZ users (p = 0.65). The incidence of hypokalemia was 19.2% in the CLTD group versus 16.7% in the HCTZ group (p = 0.07). In conclusion, in hypertensive patients, CLTD and HCTZ showed comparable cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.