Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Subin Lim, Ju Hyeon Kim, Seungmi Oh, Soon Jun Hong, Cheol Woong Yu, Hyung Joon Joo, Yong Hyun Kim, Eung Ju Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients","authors":"Subin Lim,&nbsp;Ju Hyeon Kim,&nbsp;Seungmi Oh,&nbsp;Soon Jun Hong,&nbsp;Cheol Woong Yu,&nbsp;Hyung Joon Joo,&nbsp;Yong Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Eung Ju Kim","doi":"10.1111/jch.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chlorthalidone (CLTD) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are widely used thiazide diuretics for hypertension management. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of patients treated with CLTD versus HCTZ. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Korea University Medical Center, derived from electronic health records. A total of 14 257 hypertensive patients treated with either CLTD (<i>n</i> = 1920) or HCTZ (<i>n</i> = 12 337) were identified. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores, resulting in 1606 patients in each treatment group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and safety profiles were analyzed. Baseline characteristics after propensity score matching were well balanced between the two groups. The average age was 61.8 ± 14.6 years for CLTD users, with 59.3% being male. The 3-year MACE occurred in 1.2% of the CLTD group compared with 1.4% of the HCTZ group (hazard ratio 0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.77). For secondary outcomes, cardiovascular mortality was 0.2% in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.92). Myocardial infarction occurred in 0.3% of CLTD users and 0.4% of HCTZ users (<i>p</i> = 0.65). The incidence of hypokalemia was 19.2% in the CLTD group versus 16.7% in the HCTZ group (<i>p</i> = 0.07). In conclusion, in hypertensive patients, CLTD and HCTZ showed comparable cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chlorthalidone (CLTD) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are widely used thiazide diuretics for hypertension management. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cardiovascular outcomes of patients treated with CLTD versus HCTZ. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Korea University Medical Center, derived from electronic health records. A total of 14 257 hypertensive patients treated with either CLTD (n = 1920) or HCTZ (n = 12 337) were identified. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores, resulting in 1606 patients in each treatment group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and safety profiles were analyzed. Baseline characteristics after propensity score matching were well balanced between the two groups. The average age was 61.8 ± 14.6 years for CLTD users, with 59.3% being male. The 3-year MACE occurred in 1.2% of the CLTD group compared with 1.4% of the HCTZ group (hazard ratio 0.91, p = 0.77). For secondary outcomes, cardiovascular mortality was 0.2% in both groups (p = 0.92). Myocardial infarction occurred in 0.3% of CLTD users and 0.4% of HCTZ users (p = 0.65). The incidence of hypokalemia was 19.2% in the CLTD group versus 16.7% in the HCTZ group (p = 0.07). In conclusion, in hypertensive patients, CLTD and HCTZ showed comparable cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles.

Abstract Image

氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压患者心血管结局的比较
氯噻酮(CLTD)和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)是广泛应用于高血压治疗的噻嗪类利尿剂。本研究旨在评估和比较接受CLTD和HCTZ治疗的患者的心血管预后。这项多中心、回顾性队列研究利用了高丽大学医学中心的电子健康记录数据。共有14 257例高血压患者接受CLTD (n = 1920)或HCTZ (n = 12 337)治疗。采用倾向评分对患者进行1:1匹配,每个治疗组有1606例患者。分析了人口统计学和临床特征、主要心血管不良事件(MACE)发生率和安全性。倾向评分匹配后的基线特征在两组之间很好地平衡。CLTD使用者的平均年龄为61.8±14.6岁,男性占59.3%。CLTD组3年MACE发生率为1.2%,而HCTZ组为1.4%(风险比0.91,p = 0.77)。对于次要结局,两组的心血管死亡率均为0.2% (p = 0.92)。心肌梗死发生率为0.3%的CLTD使用者和0.4%的HCTZ使用者(p = 0.65)。CLTD组低钾血症发生率为19.2%,而HCTZ组为16.7% (p = 0.07)。总之,在高血压患者中,CLTD和HCTZ表现出相当的心血管结局和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信