Qian Tang, Yijia Wang, Chi Zhang, Yuefan Zhao, Xinjie Zhou, Jie Huang, Jun Yao
{"title":"Profiles and Influencing Factors of Work–Family Balance Among Nurses in China: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Latent Profile Analysis","authors":"Qian Tang, Yijia Wang, Chi Zhang, Yuefan Zhao, Xinjie Zhou, Jie Huang, Jun Yao","doi":"10.1155/jonm/8556545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To profile the work–family balance (WFB) among clinical nurses and identify their influencing factors.</p>\n <p><b>Background:</b> WFBs take on various patterns in nurses. Nurses with different characteristics exhibit various patterns of WFB.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was performed, involving 1292 nurses from public hospitals in Jiangsu Province from February to April 2024. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to categorize the data, and multinominal logistic regression analysis to determine factors influencing WFB.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 1718 questionnaires were distributed, yielding 1292 valid responses (a response rate of 75.2%). The total score of WFB was 44.35 ± 8.693 points. The LPA revealed three profiles of WFB: the family priority group (28.1%), the balanced adaptation group (46.8%), and the challenge coping group (25.1%). The entropy value was high (0.892), indicating a correct classification. Multivariate regression analyses showed that professional title, department, nonclinical work pressure, organizational identification, work meaning, and self-efficacy as factors influencing WFB profiles.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The WFB among nurses was at a moderate level with significant heterogeneity and could be divided into three profiles. The challenge coping group presented lower professional titles and higher self-efficacy, and working at surgical, pediatric, and other specialized departments. Managers can tailor intervention strategies based on the characteristics and influencing factors of each profile.</p>\n <p><b>Implications for Nursing Management:</b> Nursing managers must consider the characteristics of high-risk groups and factors that affect WFB and take targeted measures to mitigate work–family conflicts (WFC) among nurses and stabilize the nursing workforce.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/8556545","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/8556545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To profile the work–family balance (WFB) among clinical nurses and identify their influencing factors.
Background: WFBs take on various patterns in nurses. Nurses with different characteristics exhibit various patterns of WFB.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed, involving 1292 nurses from public hospitals in Jiangsu Province from February to April 2024. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to categorize the data, and multinominal logistic regression analysis to determine factors influencing WFB.
Results: A total of 1718 questionnaires were distributed, yielding 1292 valid responses (a response rate of 75.2%). The total score of WFB was 44.35 ± 8.693 points. The LPA revealed three profiles of WFB: the family priority group (28.1%), the balanced adaptation group (46.8%), and the challenge coping group (25.1%). The entropy value was high (0.892), indicating a correct classification. Multivariate regression analyses showed that professional title, department, nonclinical work pressure, organizational identification, work meaning, and self-efficacy as factors influencing WFB profiles.
Conclusion: The WFB among nurses was at a moderate level with significant heterogeneity and could be divided into three profiles. The challenge coping group presented lower professional titles and higher self-efficacy, and working at surgical, pediatric, and other specialized departments. Managers can tailor intervention strategies based on the characteristics and influencing factors of each profile.
Implications for Nursing Management: Nursing managers must consider the characteristics of high-risk groups and factors that affect WFB and take targeted measures to mitigate work–family conflicts (WFC) among nurses and stabilize the nursing workforce.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses.
The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide.
The Journal of Nursing Management aims to:
-Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership
-Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership
-Assess the evidence for current practice
-Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership
-Examine the impact of policy developments
-Address issues in governance, quality and safety
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
