Rapid Uptake of Nest Boxes by the Endangered Greater Glider (Petauroides volans)

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Ana Gracanin, Maaike Hofman, Stephen Willson, Jordyn B. Clough, Tyler Brown, Katarina M. Mikac
{"title":"Rapid Uptake of Nest Boxes by the Endangered Greater Glider (Petauroides volans)","authors":"Ana Gracanin,&nbsp;Maaike Hofman,&nbsp;Stephen Willson,&nbsp;Jordyn B. Clough,&nbsp;Tyler Brown,&nbsp;Katarina M. Mikac","doi":"10.1111/emr.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The loss of hollow-bearing trees poses a critical threat to hollow-dependent species. Nest boxes as supplementary habitat have emerged as a conservation tool for certain species, but their use in providing habitat for Southern Greater Gliders (<i>Petauroides volans</i>), a heat-sensitive and hollow-dependent species, remains limited. This study investigates the uptake and use of nest boxes designed specifically for Greater Gliders in a postfire environment. Thirty nest boxes were installed at a site that experienced moderate to severe fire during the 2019/2020 bushfires. Four different nest box designs were investigated for their thermal properties, colonisation rates and usage patterns. The time for a nest box to be used by a Greater Glider was rapid, at an average of 34 days after time of installation. Continuous camera monitoring over the course of a year revealed 100% colonisation, with gliders consistently using nest boxes across seasons regardless of nest box design. We found that nest box design influenced internal temperatures, and the best performing nest box design (constructed of wood and without foil insulation) was on average 1.99°C cooler inside than ambient temperatures (on warm days equal to or above 20°C). In comparison, natural tree hollows in use by Greater Gliders at the study site, had a much greater thermal buffer (on average 7.32°C cooler than ambient temperatures on warm days). Observations of Greater Gliders sitting outside at the entrance hole of nest boxes during the day was linked to warmer temperatures, indicating Greater Gliders likely exited nest boxes to thermoregulate. This study identified a rapid acceptance of nest boxes by the Greater Glider and offered insights into the role of nest boxes as supplementary habitat to assist population recovery following the loss of hollow-bearing trees.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The loss of hollow-bearing trees poses a critical threat to hollow-dependent species. Nest boxes as supplementary habitat have emerged as a conservation tool for certain species, but their use in providing habitat for Southern Greater Gliders (Petauroides volans), a heat-sensitive and hollow-dependent species, remains limited. This study investigates the uptake and use of nest boxes designed specifically for Greater Gliders in a postfire environment. Thirty nest boxes were installed at a site that experienced moderate to severe fire during the 2019/2020 bushfires. Four different nest box designs were investigated for their thermal properties, colonisation rates and usage patterns. The time for a nest box to be used by a Greater Glider was rapid, at an average of 34 days after time of installation. Continuous camera monitoring over the course of a year revealed 100% colonisation, with gliders consistently using nest boxes across seasons regardless of nest box design. We found that nest box design influenced internal temperatures, and the best performing nest box design (constructed of wood and without foil insulation) was on average 1.99°C cooler inside than ambient temperatures (on warm days equal to or above 20°C). In comparison, natural tree hollows in use by Greater Gliders at the study site, had a much greater thermal buffer (on average 7.32°C cooler than ambient temperatures on warm days). Observations of Greater Gliders sitting outside at the entrance hole of nest boxes during the day was linked to warmer temperatures, indicating Greater Gliders likely exited nest boxes to thermoregulate. This study identified a rapid acceptance of nest boxes by the Greater Glider and offered insights into the role of nest boxes as supplementary habitat to assist population recovery following the loss of hollow-bearing trees.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信