Digitally enabled sharing economy models at the base of the pyramid

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Israr Qureshi, Babita Bhatt, Dhirendra Mani Shukla
{"title":"Digitally enabled sharing economy models at the base of the pyramid","authors":"Israr Qureshi,&nbsp;Babita Bhatt,&nbsp;Dhirendra Mani Shukla","doi":"10.1111/isj.12555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The digitally enabled sharing economy, a system where underutilised assets or services are exchanged via digital platforms, offers unique opportunities for value creation at the base of the pyramid (BoP)1 (Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, <span>2021b</span>). When leveraged effectively, sharing economy models (SEM) can bring hope for a more inclusive and sustainable economic future. Leveraging digital technologies, it is claimed, facilitates the efficient redistribution of resources, ensuring that even those with limited means can access goods and services that were previously out of reach. Optimising the use of idle assets not only maximises economic benefits for participants but also, it is argued, fosters community engagement and social cohesion. Additionally, SEM have the potential to promote inclusivity and sustainability by providing marginalised communities with avenues for income generation, resource sharing and enhanced social capital. The integration of digital platforms with SEM ensures wider reach and accessibility, making it a powerful tool for addressing economic disparities and driving positive social change if implemented by social intermediaries (Pillai, Shukla, &amp; Qureshi, <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Recent studies have documented numerous digitally enabled sharing economy models (DESEM) at the BoP, which help offer a range of products and services, including transportation (e.g., SafeBoda, Eva.coop), accommodation (e.g., Fairbnb, CoAbode), innovative coworking spaces (e.g., Impact Hub), shared farming (e.g., Farmizen), agricultural equipment (e.g. EM3, Hello Tractor), trading (e.g., Ethitrade), financial services (e.g., FarmDrive, Rang De), communal sharing (e.g., Moving Feast, bHive) and sharing channels for agricultural produce (MIRI Haat, Loop) (Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, <span>2021a</span>).</p><p>DESEM has the potential to address grand societal challenges such as poverty, marginalisation, inequality, discrimination, hunger and greenhouse gas emissions that often characterise the BoP population. However, scholars have also documented the dark sides of DESEM, where discrimination, exploitation and social exclusion can be reproduced and nurtured (Mosaad et al., <span>2023</span>; Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, <span>2021c</span>). Despite its relevance, DESEM has not been adequately explored in existing research. SEM at the BoP can be understood through three dimensions: scope of sharing, possibility of socialisation and degree of social intermediation (Qureshi, Bhatt, &amp; Shukla, <span>2021b</span>). The synergistic integration of digital technologies with these dimensions has the potential to increase the access and reach of DESEM. The configurations of SEM across these dimensions and their alignment with digital technologies, such as digital platform characteristics, have significant implications for social, economic and environmental value creation (Figure 1).</p><p>The paper included in this special issue provides critical insights into the uncertainty and trust issues in DESEM, which can deter wider participation in such models at the BoP. Cheng et al. (<span>2025</span>) argue that the low income and literacy of BoP participants (drivers) exacerbate their susceptibility to uncertainties and lack of trust in the ridesharing economy, and lower their engagement in ridesharing over time. Leveraging uncertainty reduction theory, the authors explore the mechanisms for mitigating BoP drivers' uncertainty and fostering trust in the ridesharing platforms. They identify three tiers of uncertainty: trust in passengers, trust in ridesharing platforms and the effectiveness of ridesharing institutional mechanisms. Utilising a sequential, multi-study, triangulated mixed-method research design, the authors find that perceived empathy and information congruity increase BoP drivers' trust in passengers, while effective escrow services, perceived justice and matching accuracy enhance their trust in ridesharing platforms. High privacy control further boosts this trust, encouraging more engagement with the platforms. Additionally, reducing uncertainty through trust in passengers, ridesharing platforms and effective institutional mechanisms enhances driver engagement. Follow-up interviews corroborate these quantitative results. This study extends DESEM literature by exploring BoP drivers' perceptions and behaviours, emphasising the role of aligning digital platform characteristics like escrow services, matching accuracy and privacy control with SEM dimensions to mitigate negative impacts and boost engagement. Future research should explore enhancing these characteristics to further improve platform alignment with SEM dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 2","pages":"807-813"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12555","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digitally enabled sharing economy, a system where underutilised assets or services are exchanged via digital platforms, offers unique opportunities for value creation at the base of the pyramid (BoP)1 (Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, 2021b). When leveraged effectively, sharing economy models (SEM) can bring hope for a more inclusive and sustainable economic future. Leveraging digital technologies, it is claimed, facilitates the efficient redistribution of resources, ensuring that even those with limited means can access goods and services that were previously out of reach. Optimising the use of idle assets not only maximises economic benefits for participants but also, it is argued, fosters community engagement and social cohesion. Additionally, SEM have the potential to promote inclusivity and sustainability by providing marginalised communities with avenues for income generation, resource sharing and enhanced social capital. The integration of digital platforms with SEM ensures wider reach and accessibility, making it a powerful tool for addressing economic disparities and driving positive social change if implemented by social intermediaries (Pillai, Shukla, & Qureshi, 2021).

Recent studies have documented numerous digitally enabled sharing economy models (DESEM) at the BoP, which help offer a range of products and services, including transportation (e.g., SafeBoda, Eva.coop), accommodation (e.g., Fairbnb, CoAbode), innovative coworking spaces (e.g., Impact Hub), shared farming (e.g., Farmizen), agricultural equipment (e.g. EM3, Hello Tractor), trading (e.g., Ethitrade), financial services (e.g., FarmDrive, Rang De), communal sharing (e.g., Moving Feast, bHive) and sharing channels for agricultural produce (MIRI Haat, Loop) (Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, 2021a).

DESEM has the potential to address grand societal challenges such as poverty, marginalisation, inequality, discrimination, hunger and greenhouse gas emissions that often characterise the BoP population. However, scholars have also documented the dark sides of DESEM, where discrimination, exploitation and social exclusion can be reproduced and nurtured (Mosaad et al., 2023; Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, 2021c). Despite its relevance, DESEM has not been adequately explored in existing research. SEM at the BoP can be understood through three dimensions: scope of sharing, possibility of socialisation and degree of social intermediation (Qureshi, Bhatt, & Shukla, 2021b). The synergistic integration of digital technologies with these dimensions has the potential to increase the access and reach of DESEM. The configurations of SEM across these dimensions and their alignment with digital technologies, such as digital platform characteristics, have significant implications for social, economic and environmental value creation (Figure 1).

The paper included in this special issue provides critical insights into the uncertainty and trust issues in DESEM, which can deter wider participation in such models at the BoP. Cheng et al. (2025) argue that the low income and literacy of BoP participants (drivers) exacerbate their susceptibility to uncertainties and lack of trust in the ridesharing economy, and lower their engagement in ridesharing over time. Leveraging uncertainty reduction theory, the authors explore the mechanisms for mitigating BoP drivers' uncertainty and fostering trust in the ridesharing platforms. They identify three tiers of uncertainty: trust in passengers, trust in ridesharing platforms and the effectiveness of ridesharing institutional mechanisms. Utilising a sequential, multi-study, triangulated mixed-method research design, the authors find that perceived empathy and information congruity increase BoP drivers' trust in passengers, while effective escrow services, perceived justice and matching accuracy enhance their trust in ridesharing platforms. High privacy control further boosts this trust, encouraging more engagement with the platforms. Additionally, reducing uncertainty through trust in passengers, ridesharing platforms and effective institutional mechanisms enhances driver engagement. Follow-up interviews corroborate these quantitative results. This study extends DESEM literature by exploring BoP drivers' perceptions and behaviours, emphasising the role of aligning digital platform characteristics like escrow services, matching accuracy and privacy control with SEM dimensions to mitigate negative impacts and boost engagement. Future research should explore enhancing these characteristics to further improve platform alignment with SEM dimensions.

Abstract Image

金字塔底层的数字化共享经济模式
数字共享经济是一种通过数字平台交换未充分利用的资产或服务的系统,为金字塔底层的价值创造提供了独特的机会1(库雷希,巴特,&;舒克拉,2021 b)。如果利用得当,共享经济模式可以为更具包容性和可持续性的经济未来带来希望。据称,利用数字技术有助于有效地重新分配资源,确保即使是那些手段有限的人也能获得以前无法获得的商品和服务。有人认为,优化闲置资产的使用不仅可以最大限度地提高参与者的经济效益,还可以促进社区参与和社会凝聚力。此外,通过为边缘化社区提供创收、资源共享和增强社会资本的途径,SEM具有促进包容性和可持续性的潜力。数字平台与SEM的整合确保了更广泛的覆盖范围和可访问性,使其成为解决经济差距和推动积极社会变革的强大工具,如果由社会中介实施(Pillai, Shukla, &;库雷希,2021)。最近的研究记录了BoP的许多数字化共享经济模型(DESEM),这些模型有助于提供一系列产品和服务,包括交通(例如SafeBoda、Eva.coop)、住宿(例如Fairbnb、CoAbode)、创新的共享空间(例如Impact Hub)、共享农业(例如Farmizen)、农业设备(例如EM3、Hello Tractor)、交易(例如Ethitrade)、金融服务(例如FarmDrive、Rang De)、公共共享(例如Moving Feast、bHive)和农产品共享渠道(MIRI Haat, Loop)(库雷希,巴特,&;舒克拉,2021)。DESEM有潜力解决重大的社会挑战,如贫困、边缘化、不平等、歧视、饥饿和温室气体排放,这些挑战往往是BoP人口的特征。然而,学者们也记录了DESEM的黑暗面,其中歧视,剥削和社会排斥可以复制和培育(Mosaad et al., 2023;库雷希,巴特,&;舒克拉,2021 c)。尽管它具有相关性,但在现有的研究中尚未充分探讨DESEM。BoP的SEM可以通过三个维度来理解:共享的范围、社会化的可能性和社会中介的程度(Qureshi, Bhatt, &;舒克拉,2021 b)。数字技术与这些方面的协同整合有可能增加DESEM的获取和覆盖范围。SEM在这些维度上的配置及其与数字技术(如数字平台特征)的一致性对社会、经济和环境价值创造具有重要意义(图1)。本期特刊中的论文对DESEM的不确定性和信任问题提供了重要见解,这些问题可能会阻碍BoP更广泛地参与此类模型。Cheng等人(2025)认为,BoP参与者(司机)的低收入和文化水平加剧了他们对不确定性的敏感性和对拼车经济缺乏信任,并随着时间的推移降低了他们对拼车的参与度。利用不确定性减少理论,作者探讨了减轻BoP司机不确定性和培养对拼车平台信任的机制。他们确定了三层不确定性:对乘客的信任、对拼车平台的信任和拼车制度机制的有效性。利用连续、多研究、三角混合方法研究设计,作者发现感知同理心和信息一致性增加了BoP司机对乘客的信任,而有效的托管服务、感知公正和匹配准确性增强了他们对拼车平台的信任。高度的隐私控制进一步增强了这种信任,鼓励更多的平台参与。此外,通过对乘客、拼车平台和有效的制度机制的信任来减少不确定性,可以提高司机的参与度。后续访谈证实了这些定量结果。本研究通过探索BoP驾驶员的认知和行为,扩展了DESEM文献,强调了将托管服务等数字平台特征与SEM维度相匹配的作用,以减轻负面影响并提高参与度。未来的研究应该探索增强这些特征,以进一步改善平台与SEM尺寸的对齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信