{"title":"Consider potential impact of Pavia case on eligibility","authors":"Robert Romano J.D., LL.M.","doi":"10.1002/catl.31421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a not-so-surprising turn of events due to recent federal court decisions, Chief U.S. District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr., granted Vanderbilt University quarterback Diego Pavia's preliminary injunction that he filed against the NCAA in November. Pavia's request to the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville challenged the legality of NCAA Bylaws 12.8, 12.02.6, and 14.3.3 (JUCO Eligibility Limitation Bylaws). He claimed these rules violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act by reducing the number of years that former junior college players can participate in Division I football, while at the same time shortening the period of time in which they can monetize their name, image, and likeness (<i>see</i> Pl. Complaint, <i>Pavia v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n</i>, No. 3:24-cv-01336 (M.D. TN Nov. 8, 2024)).</p>","PeriodicalId":100289,"journal":{"name":"College Athletics and the Law","volume":"21 11","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College Athletics and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/catl.31421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a not-so-surprising turn of events due to recent federal court decisions, Chief U.S. District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr., granted Vanderbilt University quarterback Diego Pavia's preliminary injunction that he filed against the NCAA in November. Pavia's request to the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville challenged the legality of NCAA Bylaws 12.8, 12.02.6, and 14.3.3 (JUCO Eligibility Limitation Bylaws). He claimed these rules violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act by reducing the number of years that former junior college players can participate in Division I football, while at the same time shortening the period of time in which they can monetize their name, image, and likeness (see Pl. Complaint, Pavia v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, No. 3:24-cv-01336 (M.D. TN Nov. 8, 2024)).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
