Philipo Mtweve , Vincent Moseti , Nady Mahmoud , Tanja Kramm , Christina Bogner , Pierre Ibisch , Lisa Biber-Freudenberger
{"title":"Exploring socioeconomic and environmental impacts of road infrastructure development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review","authors":"Philipo Mtweve , Vincent Moseti , Nady Mahmoud , Tanja Kramm , Christina Bogner , Pierre Ibisch , Lisa Biber-Freudenberger","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While road infrastructure expansion continues transforming Sub-Saharan Africa, research remains fragmented between socioeconomic and environmental impact assessments. Through a systematic review of 255 peer-reviewed articles from 6189 papers (1984–2024) examining road development impacts, we reveal patterns in research focus, methodological approaches and road development impacts. Approximately 58% of published studies on road impacts examined socioeconomic impacts, 37% investigated environmental effects, while only 5% investigated both socioeconomic and environmental impacts simultaneously. Geographically, most studies were conducted in five countries (Ethiopia, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and Tanzania), with 78% of these studies published after 2014. Furthermore, our analysis found a significant relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and environmental degradation, with countries experiencing a 34% increase in observed negative environmental road impacts for each standard deviation increase in FDI (β = 0.34, p < 0.05). This effect tended to be particularly strong in countries with weaker environmental governance. Moreover, countries with higher Human Development Index (HDI) scores demonstrated 28% fewer negative environmental impacts, suggesting development status significantly influences environmental management capacity. Consequently, we suggest assessing road effects from an interdisciplinary perspective to better understand road-induced tradeoffs and offer informed, evidence-based planning for road infrastructure development that minimizes environmental costs and maximizes socioeconomic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While road infrastructure expansion continues transforming Sub-Saharan Africa, research remains fragmented between socioeconomic and environmental impact assessments. Through a systematic review of 255 peer-reviewed articles from 6189 papers (1984–2024) examining road development impacts, we reveal patterns in research focus, methodological approaches and road development impacts. Approximately 58% of published studies on road impacts examined socioeconomic impacts, 37% investigated environmental effects, while only 5% investigated both socioeconomic and environmental impacts simultaneously. Geographically, most studies were conducted in five countries (Ethiopia, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and Tanzania), with 78% of these studies published after 2014. Furthermore, our analysis found a significant relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and environmental degradation, with countries experiencing a 34% increase in observed negative environmental road impacts for each standard deviation increase in FDI (β = 0.34, p < 0.05). This effect tended to be particularly strong in countries with weaker environmental governance. Moreover, countries with higher Human Development Index (HDI) scores demonstrated 28% fewer negative environmental impacts, suggesting development status significantly influences environmental management capacity. Consequently, we suggest assessing road effects from an interdisciplinary perspective to better understand road-induced tradeoffs and offer informed, evidence-based planning for road infrastructure development that minimizes environmental costs and maximizes socioeconomic benefits.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.