Impairments in geriatric assessment and their associations with different grip strength cutoffs and components of the Short Physical Performance Battery among older adults with cancer

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Saul Cobbing , Shabbir M.H. Alibhai , Rana Jin , Susie Monginot , Efthymios Papadopoulos
{"title":"Impairments in geriatric assessment and their associations with different grip strength cutoffs and components of the Short Physical Performance Battery among older adults with cancer","authors":"Saul Cobbing ,&nbsp;Shabbir M.H. Alibhai ,&nbsp;Rana Jin ,&nbsp;Susie Monginot ,&nbsp;Efthymios Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The grip strength test is often used during geriatric assessment (GA) to assess muscle strength in older adults. However, it is unclear which grip strength cutoffs are most relevant to older adults in the context of GA. Physical performance during GA is often assessed via the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Whether the SPPB is superior to two of its individual components (4-m gait speed and the 5-chair stand test) for identifying GA abnormalities is unknown. The objectives of this study were (i) to identify which grip strength thresholds are associated with impairments in GA domains and with an abnormal GA overall and (ii) to examine whether total SPPB score is a stronger indicator of an abnormal GA and each of its domains than 4-m gait speed and the 5-chair stand test.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of older adults with cancer aged ≥65 years who had undergone a GA prior to treatment. Grip strength and the SPPB were completed during GA. We examined three different grip strength cutoffs: (i) European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2); (ii) the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH); and (iii) the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC). Low SPPB was defined as a score of ≤9 out of 12 points. A score of ≤3 out of 4 points was used to identify abnormalities in the 4-m gait speed and 5-chair stand test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to address the study objectives.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 475 participants (mean age: 80.7 years, 42.9 % female) were included. The FNIH grip strength criteria had a higher discriminative ability of an abnormal GA (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.646) than the EWGSOP2 and the SDOC criteria. Compared to the SPPB and the 5-chair stand test, the 4-m gait speed was the strongest indicator of an abnormal GA (AUC = 0.737). The addition of low grip strength improved the performance of the SPPB (AUC Δ = +0.05) and gait speed (AUC Δ = +0.04) for identifying an abnormal GA.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Low grip strength per the FNIH and slow gait speed are of clinical relevance during GA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"16 3","pages":"Article 102201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406825000177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The grip strength test is often used during geriatric assessment (GA) to assess muscle strength in older adults. However, it is unclear which grip strength cutoffs are most relevant to older adults in the context of GA. Physical performance during GA is often assessed via the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Whether the SPPB is superior to two of its individual components (4-m gait speed and the 5-chair stand test) for identifying GA abnormalities is unknown. The objectives of this study were (i) to identify which grip strength thresholds are associated with impairments in GA domains and with an abnormal GA overall and (ii) to examine whether total SPPB score is a stronger indicator of an abnormal GA and each of its domains than 4-m gait speed and the 5-chair stand test.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of older adults with cancer aged ≥65 years who had undergone a GA prior to treatment. Grip strength and the SPPB were completed during GA. We examined three different grip strength cutoffs: (i) European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2); (ii) the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH); and (iii) the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC). Low SPPB was defined as a score of ≤9 out of 12 points. A score of ≤3 out of 4 points was used to identify abnormalities in the 4-m gait speed and 5-chair stand test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to address the study objectives.

Results

A total of 475 participants (mean age: 80.7 years, 42.9 % female) were included. The FNIH grip strength criteria had a higher discriminative ability of an abnormal GA (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.646) than the EWGSOP2 and the SDOC criteria. Compared to the SPPB and the 5-chair stand test, the 4-m gait speed was the strongest indicator of an abnormal GA (AUC = 0.737). The addition of low grip strength improved the performance of the SPPB (AUC Δ = +0.05) and gait speed (AUC Δ = +0.04) for identifying an abnormal GA.

Discussion

Low grip strength per the FNIH and slow gait speed are of clinical relevance during GA.
老年癌症患者的老年评估缺陷及其与不同握力截止值和短体能测试组件的关系
在老年评估(GA)中,握力测试通常用于评估老年人的肌肉力量。然而,目前尚不清楚在GA的背景下,哪些握力切断与老年人最相关。GA期间的物理性能通常通过短物理性能电池(SPPB)进行评估。在识别GA异常方面,SPPB是否优于它的两个单独组件(4米步速和5椅站立测试)尚不清楚。本研究的目的是(i)确定哪些握力阈值与GA域的损伤和GA总体异常有关,(ii)检查SPPB总分是否比4米步速和5椅子站立测试更能指示GA及其每个域的异常。材料和方法这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为年龄≥65岁的老年癌症患者,在治疗前接受过GA。抓地力和SPPB在GA过程中完成。我们研究了三种不同的握力临界值:(i)欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组2 (EWGSOP2);(二)国家卫生研究院基金会;(iii)肌少症定义和结局联盟(SDOC)。低SPPB定义为得分≤9分(满分12分)。4米步速和5椅站立测试以≤3分(满分4分)判定异常。采用多变量逻辑回归来解决研究目标。结果共纳入475例受试者,平均年龄80.7岁,女性42.9%。FNIH握力标准对异常GA的判别能力(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.646)高于EWGSOP2和SDOC标准。与SPPB和5椅站立试验相比,4 m步速是GA异常的最强指标(AUC = 0.737)。低握力的加入提高了SPPB (AUC Δ = +0.05)和步态速度(AUC Δ = +0.04)识别异常GA的性能。低握力(FNIH)和缓慢的步态速度是GA的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信