Acute toxicity of natural and synthetic clothing fibers towards Daphnia magna: Influence of fiber type and morphology

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andrew Barrick , Alison J. Boardwine , Nhung H.A. Nguyen , Alena Sevcu , Jana Novotna , Tham C. Hoang
{"title":"Acute toxicity of natural and synthetic clothing fibers towards Daphnia magna: Influence of fiber type and morphology","authors":"Andrew Barrick ,&nbsp;Alison J. Boardwine ,&nbsp;Nhung H.A. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Alena Sevcu ,&nbsp;Jana Novotna ,&nbsp;Tham C. Hoang","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental consequences of plastic pollution have come under scrutiny over the past 20 years as stewardship of the biosphere has risen in popularity. Microplastic research has focused on fragmented particles from hard plastics with limited research focused on microfibers released from textiles, which constitute a significant portion of microplastics in aquatic environments. The present study investigated hazards associated with two natural microfibers (cotton and silk) and four synthetic microfibers (acrylonitrile, Kevlar, nylon, and polyester) towards <em>Daphnia magna</em>. Results demonstrated that toxicity is dependent on the polymer type and morphology. Natural microfibers had no significant effects on <em>D. magna</em> whereas nylon microfibers were acutely toxic. While the total number of microfibers in exposure chambers contributed to microfiber ingestion and toxicity, suspended microfibers were weakly correlated to microfiber ingestion and toxicity. Microfibers with smoother surfaces were more toxic than microfibers that were frayed. Toxicity was more strongly related to microfiber ingestion than exposure concentration, suggesting that microfiber uptake is an important measurement endpoint for characterizing effects. Research with longer exposure times and emphasis on endpoints other than survival, such as uptake and retention of microfibers, feeding rates, growth and development, and reproduction are needed to understand the ecotoxicity of microfibers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"967 ","pages":"Article 178751"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725003857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental consequences of plastic pollution have come under scrutiny over the past 20 years as stewardship of the biosphere has risen in popularity. Microplastic research has focused on fragmented particles from hard plastics with limited research focused on microfibers released from textiles, which constitute a significant portion of microplastics in aquatic environments. The present study investigated hazards associated with two natural microfibers (cotton and silk) and four synthetic microfibers (acrylonitrile, Kevlar, nylon, and polyester) towards Daphnia magna. Results demonstrated that toxicity is dependent on the polymer type and morphology. Natural microfibers had no significant effects on D. magna whereas nylon microfibers were acutely toxic. While the total number of microfibers in exposure chambers contributed to microfiber ingestion and toxicity, suspended microfibers were weakly correlated to microfiber ingestion and toxicity. Microfibers with smoother surfaces were more toxic than microfibers that were frayed. Toxicity was more strongly related to microfiber ingestion than exposure concentration, suggesting that microfiber uptake is an important measurement endpoint for characterizing effects. Research with longer exposure times and emphasis on endpoints other than survival, such as uptake and retention of microfibers, feeding rates, growth and development, and reproduction are needed to understand the ecotoxicity of microfibers.

Abstract Image

天然和合成服装纤维对大水蚤的急性毒性:纤维类型和形态的影响
在过去的20年里,随着对生物圈的管理越来越受欢迎,塑料污染的环境后果受到了密切关注。微塑料研究主要集中在硬塑料的碎片颗粒上,对纺织品释放的微纤维的研究有限,这些微纤维构成了水生环境中微塑料的很大一部分。本研究调查了两种天然微纤维(棉和丝)和四种合成微纤维(丙烯腈、凯夫拉尔、尼龙和聚酯)对大水蚤的危害。结果表明,毒性与聚合物类型和形态有关。天然微纤维对D. magna无显著影响,而尼龙微纤维对D. magna有急性毒性。虽然暴露室中微纤维的总数与微纤维的摄入和毒性有关,但悬浮微纤维与微纤维的摄入和毒性相关性较弱。表面光滑的微纤维比表面磨损的微纤维毒性更大。毒性与微纤维摄取量的关系比暴露浓度的关系更强,这表明微纤维摄取量是表征影响的重要测量终点。为了了解微纤维的生态毒性,需要进行更长的接触时间和强调生存以外的终点的研究,如微纤维的吸收和保留、摄食率、生长发育和繁殖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信