Maritime emissions trading in the EU: Systematic literature review and policy assessment

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Manolis Kotzampasakis
{"title":"Maritime emissions trading in the EU: Systematic literature review and policy assessment","authors":"Manolis Kotzampasakis","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has been expanded to include maritime transport. Since 2024, large ships that stop at European Economic Area ports are subject to a carbon price under the EU's greenhouse gas emissions cap. To improve understanding about the goals and possible impacts of this EU policy expansion, the present article conducts a Scopus and Web of Science-based systematic literature review of peer-reviewed publications that assess the legal design or expected effects of EU maritime emissions trading. The relevant findings from 51 identified studies are categorized based on a framework of assessment criteria, which are systematically derived from the policy objectives outlined in the EU ETS Directive: emissions reductions, cost-effectiveness, economic efficiency, equity, and coherence. The aggregation of literature findings with a qualitative research synthesis provides a comprehensive up-to-date assessment of the maritime EU ETS, illuminating trade-offs between the pursued policy objectives and revealing gaps in existing knowledge. These findings suggest that the EU ETS can result in significant emissions reductions, at a lower overall cost compared to regulatory alternatives. It can also help to stimulate the adoption of technical and operational decarbonization solutions in maritime transport. However, uncertainties remain regarding the risk of carbon leakage, the uneven economic impacts of the EU ETS on certain countries, populations, and shipping segments, as well as its coherence with other domestic and international policies. This overview guides decision-makers in the first implementation stages of the maritime EU ETS and informs the design of similar market-based policies in other jurisdictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 28-41"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2500071X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has been expanded to include maritime transport. Since 2024, large ships that stop at European Economic Area ports are subject to a carbon price under the EU's greenhouse gas emissions cap. To improve understanding about the goals and possible impacts of this EU policy expansion, the present article conducts a Scopus and Web of Science-based systematic literature review of peer-reviewed publications that assess the legal design or expected effects of EU maritime emissions trading. The relevant findings from 51 identified studies are categorized based on a framework of assessment criteria, which are systematically derived from the policy objectives outlined in the EU ETS Directive: emissions reductions, cost-effectiveness, economic efficiency, equity, and coherence. The aggregation of literature findings with a qualitative research synthesis provides a comprehensive up-to-date assessment of the maritime EU ETS, illuminating trade-offs between the pursued policy objectives and revealing gaps in existing knowledge. These findings suggest that the EU ETS can result in significant emissions reductions, at a lower overall cost compared to regulatory alternatives. It can also help to stimulate the adoption of technical and operational decarbonization solutions in maritime transport. However, uncertainties remain regarding the risk of carbon leakage, the uneven economic impacts of the EU ETS on certain countries, populations, and shipping segments, as well as its coherence with other domestic and international policies. This overview guides decision-makers in the first implementation stages of the maritime EU ETS and informs the design of similar market-based policies in other jurisdictions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信