Michael M. Lindeborg, Alyssa M. Civantos, Michelle Florentine, Anna K. Meyer, Kristina W. Rosbe
{"title":"Botox injections with and without general anesthesia for pediatric sialorrhea: A cost, efficacy, and safety analysis","authors":"Michael M. Lindeborg, Alyssa M. Civantos, Michelle Florentine, Anna K. Meyer, Kristina W. Rosbe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Ultrasound-guided salivary gland Botulinum toxin A (Botox) injections are often used in pediatric patients with refractory sialorrhea, performed with or without general anesthesia. This study aims to compare outcomes and costs between these methods.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary children's hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with chronic sialorrhea refractory to medical therapy who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections between 2012 and 2023 under general anesthesia (n = 50; 126 injections) were compared to those performed without general anesthesia (n = 31; 116 injections). Sociodemographic factors, clinical history, and injection regimen were recorded. Available billing data from this time period was used to compare costs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pediatric patients who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia did not have statistically significant differences in post-injection cessation of anticholinergic medications (AOR = 0.980, [0.29, 3.29]), family-reported improvement in sialorrhea (AOR = 3.25, [0.58, 18.1]), admissions for aspiration pneumonia within the year (Coefficient = 0.260, [-0.22, 0.75]), or progression to sialorrhea surgery (AOR = 0.374, [0.07, 2.16]) compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Amongst patients who underwent repeat injections, there were no significant differences in the average number of injections (p = 0.41) or time between injections (p = 0.16). Botulinum toxin A injections performed in the outpatient setting ($1374.49) had significantly lower costs compared to injections performed under general anesthesia ($5077.13) (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pediatric patients undergoing Botulinum toxin A injections with and without general anesthesia have similar efficacy and quality outcomes. Exploring the advantages of Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia could lead to improved access, reduced risks of general anesthesia, and reduced costs to the medical system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625000576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Ultrasound-guided salivary gland Botulinum toxin A (Botox) injections are often used in pediatric patients with refractory sialorrhea, performed with or without general anesthesia. This study aims to compare outcomes and costs between these methods.
Study design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Tertiary children's hospital.
Methods
Patients with chronic sialorrhea refractory to medical therapy who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections between 2012 and 2023 under general anesthesia (n = 50; 126 injections) were compared to those performed without general anesthesia (n = 31; 116 injections). Sociodemographic factors, clinical history, and injection regimen were recorded. Available billing data from this time period was used to compare costs.
Results
Pediatric patients who underwent Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia did not have statistically significant differences in post-injection cessation of anticholinergic medications (AOR = 0.980, [0.29, 3.29]), family-reported improvement in sialorrhea (AOR = 3.25, [0.58, 18.1]), admissions for aspiration pneumonia within the year (Coefficient = 0.260, [-0.22, 0.75]), or progression to sialorrhea surgery (AOR = 0.374, [0.07, 2.16]) compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Amongst patients who underwent repeat injections, there were no significant differences in the average number of injections (p = 0.41) or time between injections (p = 0.16). Botulinum toxin A injections performed in the outpatient setting ($1374.49) had significantly lower costs compared to injections performed under general anesthesia ($5077.13) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Pediatric patients undergoing Botulinum toxin A injections with and without general anesthesia have similar efficacy and quality outcomes. Exploring the advantages of Botulinum toxin A injections without general anesthesia could lead to improved access, reduced risks of general anesthesia, and reduced costs to the medical system.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.