Mining space and sustainability: A systematic review

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Leanna Butters
{"title":"Mining space and sustainability: A systematic review","authors":"Leanna Butters","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mining operations present social, economic, and environmental benefits and challenges, many of which are context specific. While social approaches and spatial approaches have been used to study mining impacts for decades, approaches that consider social and spatial dimensions in tandem are growing. This is timely from a sustainability perspective given the need for integrated research approaches that can uncover the nature of complex mining-related challenges and deliver effective solutions. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review. It documents concepts and methods used to frame and investigate social space to date within mining contexts and considers how these link to sustainability. This study finds that social spatial research on mining is framed primarily by socio-spatial, socio-ecological, and materialist perspectives. Authors mainly rely on traditional methodologies and methods, especially ethnography. Social spatial research appears to be well-suited to the study of diverse relational dynamics in the context of mining and sustainability. However, while existing research has contributed to much new knowledge about complex sustainability problems (systems knowledge) and values that ought to change (target knowledge), fewer papers consider strategies for addressing these problems (transformation knowledge). Future research might adopt co-productive and/or transdisciplinary approaches to develop new, innovative research methods and meaningful solutions to sustainability challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mining operations present social, economic, and environmental benefits and challenges, many of which are context specific. While social approaches and spatial approaches have been used to study mining impacts for decades, approaches that consider social and spatial dimensions in tandem are growing. This is timely from a sustainability perspective given the need for integrated research approaches that can uncover the nature of complex mining-related challenges and deliver effective solutions. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review. It documents concepts and methods used to frame and investigate social space to date within mining contexts and considers how these link to sustainability. This study finds that social spatial research on mining is framed primarily by socio-spatial, socio-ecological, and materialist perspectives. Authors mainly rely on traditional methodologies and methods, especially ethnography. Social spatial research appears to be well-suited to the study of diverse relational dynamics in the context of mining and sustainability. However, while existing research has contributed to much new knowledge about complex sustainability problems (systems knowledge) and values that ought to change (target knowledge), fewer papers consider strategies for addressing these problems (transformation knowledge). Future research might adopt co-productive and/or transdisciplinary approaches to develop new, innovative research methods and meaningful solutions to sustainability challenges.
采矿空间和可持续性:系统审查
采矿作业带来了社会、经济和环境方面的利益和挑战,其中许多是具体情况的。虽然社会方法和空间方法几十年来一直用于研究采矿影响,但同时考虑社会和空间方面的方法正在增加。从可持续性的角度来看,这是及时的,因为需要综合研究方法,可以揭示复杂采矿相关挑战的本质并提供有效的解决方案。本文介绍了系统文献综述的结果。它记录了迄今为止在采矿背景下用于构建和调查社会空间的概念和方法,并考虑了这些与可持续性的联系。研究发现,采矿的社会空间研究主要由社会空间、社会生态和物质主义三个视角构成。作者主要依靠传统的方法论和方法,特别是民族志。社会空间研究似乎非常适合研究采矿和可持续性背景下的各种关系动态。然而,虽然现有的研究已经为复杂的可持续性问题(系统知识)和应该改变的价值观(目标知识)贡献了许多新知识,但很少有论文考虑解决这些问题的策略(转型知识)。未来的研究可能会采用合作生产和/或跨学科的方法来开发新的、创新的研究方法和有意义的解决方案,以应对可持续发展的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信