A temporal investigation of the relationship between difficulty concentrating and perseverative thought

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Paige L. DeGennaro, Mary Blendermann, Brittany Alberts, Jennifer S. Silk, Peter J. Gianaros, Lauren S. Hallion
{"title":"A temporal investigation of the relationship between difficulty concentrating and perseverative thought","authors":"Paige L. DeGennaro,&nbsp;Mary Blendermann,&nbsp;Brittany Alberts,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Silk,&nbsp;Peter J. Gianaros,&nbsp;Lauren S. Hallion","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Perseverative thought (also known as repetitive thought) is an established transdiagnostic mechanism of internalizing psychopathology characterized primarily by its repetitive, difficult to control quality. Subjective difficulty concentrating frequently coincides with perseverative thought and may function as both mechanism and clinical consequence of perseverative thought. Although cognitive theories suggest a bidirectional relationship between perseverative thought and difficulty concentrating, experimental and longitudinal investigations provide mixed evidence. The current study addresses this gap by testing a bidirectional relationship between momentary perseverative thought and difficulty concentrating using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) (8 surveys per day for 14 days) with 200 adult community participants (<em>N</em> = 155 with compliance ≥ 70 %) oversampled for moderate/severe perseverative thought. Multilevel modeling tested concurrent and time-lagged associations. Difficulty concentrating and perseverative thought were concurrently and prospectively related within-person: higher difficulty concentrating at <em>T</em>-1 predicted higher perseverative thought at <em>T</em>, and higher perseverative thought at <em>T</em>-1 predicted higher difficulty concentrating at <em>T</em> (<em>β =</em>.19 –.20, <em>p &lt; .</em>001). Findings held when controlling for the outcome at <em>T</em>-1 (<em>β</em> =.02 – <em>.</em>06, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). These findings demonstrate covariation between difficulty concentrating and perseverative thought within-person in daily life consistent with theoretical models that predict bidirectional relationships. Findings suggest that intervening on difficulty concentrating and/or perseverative thought may reduce the “vicious cycle” of perseverative thought episodes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102987"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618525000234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perseverative thought (also known as repetitive thought) is an established transdiagnostic mechanism of internalizing psychopathology characterized primarily by its repetitive, difficult to control quality. Subjective difficulty concentrating frequently coincides with perseverative thought and may function as both mechanism and clinical consequence of perseverative thought. Although cognitive theories suggest a bidirectional relationship between perseverative thought and difficulty concentrating, experimental and longitudinal investigations provide mixed evidence. The current study addresses this gap by testing a bidirectional relationship between momentary perseverative thought and difficulty concentrating using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) (8 surveys per day for 14 days) with 200 adult community participants (N = 155 with compliance ≥ 70 %) oversampled for moderate/severe perseverative thought. Multilevel modeling tested concurrent and time-lagged associations. Difficulty concentrating and perseverative thought were concurrently and prospectively related within-person: higher difficulty concentrating at T-1 predicted higher perseverative thought at T, and higher perseverative thought at T-1 predicted higher difficulty concentrating at T (β =.19 –.20, p < .001). Findings held when controlling for the outcome at T-1 (β =.02 – .06, p < .001). These findings demonstrate covariation between difficulty concentrating and perseverative thought within-person in daily life consistent with theoretical models that predict bidirectional relationships. Findings suggest that intervening on difficulty concentrating and/or perseverative thought may reduce the “vicious cycle” of perseverative thought episodes.
集中注意力困难与持久性思维之间关系的时间调查
持续性思维(也称为重复性思维)是一种已建立的内化精神病理的跨诊断机制,其主要特征是其重复性和难以控制的质量。主观注意力难以集中往往与持续性思维同时发生,可能是持续性思维的机制和临床后果。尽管认知理论认为,持久思维和注意力难以集中之间存在双向关系,但实验和纵向调查提供了混合证据。目前的研究通过使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)(每天8次调查,持续14天)对200名成年社区参与者(N = 155,依从性≥70 %)进行中度/重度持续性思维过采样,测试了瞬时持续性思维与注意力集中困难之间的双向关系,从而解决了这一差距。多层建模测试并发关联和滞后关联。在人体内,注意力集中困难和持续性思维同时存在前瞻性相关:T-1时注意力集中难度越高,预测T时持久性思维越高,T-1时持久性思维越高,预测T时注意力集中难度越高(β =。19 -。20日,p & lt; 措施)。当控制T-1时的结果(β =。02 - 0.06, p <; .001)。这些发现表明,在日常生活中,注意力集中困难和持续思维之间存在共变,这与预测双向关系的理论模型一致。研究结果表明,干预注意力集中困难和/或持续性思维可能会减少持续性思维发作的“恶性循环”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信