Bin Wei , Guoxiong Lu , Zhiqiang Bai , David O. Osei-Hwedieh , Yunsheng Chen , Qunxing Li , Zhijun Xie , Peichia Lu , Jiahao Miao , Niu Liu , Jiaying Wu , Hsinyu Lin , Fan Wu , Lizao Zhang , Siqi Ren , Yingying Zhu , Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed , Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro , Xinghui Dong , Kui Jiang , Song Fan
{"title":"Augmented reality in preoperative anterolateral thigh flap perforators positioning: A pilot diagnostic study","authors":"Bin Wei , Guoxiong Lu , Zhiqiang Bai , David O. Osei-Hwedieh , Yunsheng Chen , Qunxing Li , Zhijun Xie , Peichia Lu , Jiahao Miao , Niu Liu , Jiaying Wu , Hsinyu Lin , Fan Wu , Lizao Zhang , Siqi Ren , Yingying Zhu , Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed , Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro , Xinghui Dong , Kui Jiang , Song Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is the primary choice for healthy and vascularized soft-tissue coverage for appendicular and axial soft tissue reconstruction, especially in the head and neck regions. Nonetheless, there is substantial anatomic variation in ALT perforators that affect flap integrity, survival rates, and donor-site morbidity. Regardless of the ALT flap type, accurate location of perforators can greatly improve surgical success rates and reduce the risk of secondary surgeries. Therefore, we investigated a novel approach for locating perforators.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We utilized augmented reality (AR) technology in combination with a self-designed device, <em>Finder</em>, to locate the perforators of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, and compared its accuracy to that of traditional ultrasound localization.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>In this study, 24 patients underwent ALT flap reconstruction, with all flaps surviving except one case of partial necrosis. Comparing the two positioning methods, Ultrasonic color Doppler (UCD) showed a sensitivity of 81.1 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 64.3 %–91.4 %] and an AUC of 0.70 (95 % CI 0.55–0.86). AR-Finder demonstrated a higher sensitivity of 97.5 % (95 % CI 85.3 %-99.9 %, p = 0.031) and an AUC of 0.90 (95 % CI 0.80–1.01, p = 0.035). The average distance difference from the actual perforator to virtually determined location was 3.54 ± 2.80 mm (95 % CI 2.58–4.50) for AR-Finder and 9.57 ± 5.84 mm (95 % CI 7.75–11.58) for UCD (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this pilot study, AR-Finder demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the UCD method for locating perforators in ALT flaps, providing a new and reliable tool for the design and elevation of ALT flaps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837525000181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is the primary choice for healthy and vascularized soft-tissue coverage for appendicular and axial soft tissue reconstruction, especially in the head and neck regions. Nonetheless, there is substantial anatomic variation in ALT perforators that affect flap integrity, survival rates, and donor-site morbidity. Regardless of the ALT flap type, accurate location of perforators can greatly improve surgical success rates and reduce the risk of secondary surgeries. Therefore, we investigated a novel approach for locating perforators.
Method
We utilized augmented reality (AR) technology in combination with a self-designed device, Finder, to locate the perforators of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, and compared its accuracy to that of traditional ultrasound localization.
Result
In this study, 24 patients underwent ALT flap reconstruction, with all flaps surviving except one case of partial necrosis. Comparing the two positioning methods, Ultrasonic color Doppler (UCD) showed a sensitivity of 81.1 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 64.3 %–91.4 %] and an AUC of 0.70 (95 % CI 0.55–0.86). AR-Finder demonstrated a higher sensitivity of 97.5 % (95 % CI 85.3 %-99.9 %, p = 0.031) and an AUC of 0.90 (95 % CI 0.80–1.01, p = 0.035). The average distance difference from the actual perforator to virtually determined location was 3.54 ± 2.80 mm (95 % CI 2.58–4.50) for AR-Finder and 9.57 ± 5.84 mm (95 % CI 7.75–11.58) for UCD (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In this pilot study, AR-Finder demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the UCD method for locating perforators in ALT flaps, providing a new and reliable tool for the design and elevation of ALT flaps.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.