Olivia N. Reul, Rachel K. Surowiec, Nusaiba N. Chowdhury, Dyann M. Segvich, Joseph M. Wallace
{"title":"Skeletal impacts of dual in vivo compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in mice","authors":"Olivia N. Reul, Rachel K. Surowiec, Nusaiba N. Chowdhury, Dyann M. Segvich, Joseph M. Wallace","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of compressive axial tibial loading for evaluation of bone adaptation and mechanotransduction has become a common technique in recent years. Despite its popularity, it only produces a single experimental limb per animal which can escalate sample sizes depending on study endpoints. We hypothesized the combination of compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in a single animal would induce bone formation in loaded limbs, providing two experimental limbs per animal thereby reducing the animals required per study by half. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased at 9 and 19 weeks (wks). Based on sex and age they were divided into 4 groups of N = 17. From each group, N = 5 were sacrificed at 10 and 20 wks for strain gauge calibration. At 11 wks and 21 wks, the left ulnae and right tibiae of the remaining animals (N = 12/group) were loaded 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Tibiae of all groups experienced significant increases in architectural properties due to loading in both trabecular and cortical compartments while there were no significant improvements in the ulna. Female tibiae showed improvements in mechanical properties, but these were not observed in the male tibiae where detrimental impacts were observed. In the ulna, females showed limited mechanical changes due to loading. Contrastingly, loading in males at 11 wks led to decreased mechanical properties while at 21 wks no impacts were observed. Overall, reported beneficial impacts of loading in tibiae were observed in architectural properties but were not maintained in the males’ mechanical properties. Impacts of ulnar loading on architectural and whole bone mechanical properties that have been reported elsewhere were not observed in any groups. These data suggest when architectural and mechanical properties are end points, combined loading is not optimal for reducing the number of animals required per study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106950"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of compressive axial tibial loading for evaluation of bone adaptation and mechanotransduction has become a common technique in recent years. Despite its popularity, it only produces a single experimental limb per animal which can escalate sample sizes depending on study endpoints. We hypothesized the combination of compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in a single animal would induce bone formation in loaded limbs, providing two experimental limbs per animal thereby reducing the animals required per study by half. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased at 9 and 19 weeks (wks). Based on sex and age they were divided into 4 groups of N = 17. From each group, N = 5 were sacrificed at 10 and 20 wks for strain gauge calibration. At 11 wks and 21 wks, the left ulnae and right tibiae of the remaining animals (N = 12/group) were loaded 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Tibiae of all groups experienced significant increases in architectural properties due to loading in both trabecular and cortical compartments while there were no significant improvements in the ulna. Female tibiae showed improvements in mechanical properties, but these were not observed in the male tibiae where detrimental impacts were observed. In the ulna, females showed limited mechanical changes due to loading. Contrastingly, loading in males at 11 wks led to decreased mechanical properties while at 21 wks no impacts were observed. Overall, reported beneficial impacts of loading in tibiae were observed in architectural properties but were not maintained in the males’ mechanical properties. Impacts of ulnar loading on architectural and whole bone mechanical properties that have been reported elsewhere were not observed in any groups. These data suggest when architectural and mechanical properties are end points, combined loading is not optimal for reducing the number of animals required per study.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.