C0 FEM approximation for the thermal buckling analysis of thin plates: Lagrange Multiplier and Penalty Methods

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Saeedeh Qaderi , Michele Bacciocchi , Nicholas Fantuzzi
{"title":"C0 FEM approximation for the thermal buckling analysis of thin plates: Lagrange Multiplier and Penalty Methods","authors":"Saeedeh Qaderi ,&nbsp;Michele Bacciocchi ,&nbsp;Nicholas Fantuzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> FEM approximation for the thermal buckling of laminated thin plates employing the Lagrange Multiplier Method (LMM) and Penalty Method (PM) has been assessed. Such methods enforce internal constraints without requiring more complex formulations in a classical finite element implementation. Specifically, the thin plate assumption is applied in a first-order plate theory, eliminating the need for Hermite interpolation functions and complex meshing. Constraints are included in the formulation via energy functions. Applying the two methods enables the interpolation of displacement parameters using Lagrange shape functions with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> continuity. This approach simplifies implementation and enhances computational efficiency. In terms of model size, the Penalty Method (PM) does not introduce additional degrees of freedom (DOF). In contrast, the Lagrange Multiplier Method (LMM) increases the system’s DOF due to the inclusion of Lagrange multipliers. For the case of LMM, the regularization method has been utilized to solve the saddle point problem. A parametric study has been carried out for the critical buckling temperatures of laminated thin plates. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, results were compared with known analytical solutions and other conventional approaches, demonstrating strong agreement. Comparing the two methods shows that both LMM and PM simplify implementing numerical algorithms for optimal solutions in computational environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50483,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 105605"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997753825000397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A C0 FEM approximation for the thermal buckling of laminated thin plates employing the Lagrange Multiplier Method (LMM) and Penalty Method (PM) has been assessed. Such methods enforce internal constraints without requiring more complex formulations in a classical finite element implementation. Specifically, the thin plate assumption is applied in a first-order plate theory, eliminating the need for Hermite interpolation functions and complex meshing. Constraints are included in the formulation via energy functions. Applying the two methods enables the interpolation of displacement parameters using Lagrange shape functions with C0 continuity. This approach simplifies implementation and enhances computational efficiency. In terms of model size, the Penalty Method (PM) does not introduce additional degrees of freedom (DOF). In contrast, the Lagrange Multiplier Method (LMM) increases the system’s DOF due to the inclusion of Lagrange multipliers. For the case of LMM, the regularization method has been utilized to solve the saddle point problem. A parametric study has been carried out for the critical buckling temperatures of laminated thin plates. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, results were compared with known analytical solutions and other conventional approaches, demonstrating strong agreement. Comparing the two methods shows that both LMM and PM simplify implementing numerical algorithms for optimal solutions in computational environments.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
275
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mechanics endash; A/Solids continues to publish articles in English in all areas of Solid Mechanics from the physical and mathematical basis to materials engineering, technological applications and methods of modern computational mechanics, both pure and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信