Political control and internal governance in state-owned enterprises: Evidence from party-building reform in China

IF 4.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Fangjun Wang , Jiyuan Li , Mark Anderson , Junqin Sun
{"title":"Political control and internal governance in state-owned enterprises: Evidence from party-building reform in China","authors":"Fangjun Wang ,&nbsp;Jiyuan Li ,&nbsp;Mark Anderson ,&nbsp;Junqin Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.mar.2024.100923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research finds that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that are subject to agency problems associated with political control operate less efficiently than other companies. Other research suggests that internal governance can mitigate agency problems. We combine these lines of research and examine whether the degree of cost stickiness in Chinese SOEs increases or decreases with implementation of party-building reform. Party-building reform elevates the status of the Party Decision Committee (PDC), an internal group of managers and staff representatives empowered to represent party interests. A more influential PDC may enhance political control while, at the same time, a stronger PDC may serve an internal governance role that mitigates agency-related problems. Our results provide evidence that cost stickiness is significantly lower in SOEs after implementation of party-building reform, supporting an internal governance effect as opposed to a political control effect of the PDC on management decision-making. Our evidence indicates that the reduction in cost stickiness occurs when the PDC is more independent from managers and more actively engaged in governance. Further analysis shows that the effect of PDC internal governance is more pronounced in firms where agency problems are apparently greater, traditional governance mechanisms are weaker and political influence is lower, supporting our main results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51429,"journal":{"name":"Management Accounting Research","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044500524000453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research finds that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that are subject to agency problems associated with political control operate less efficiently than other companies. Other research suggests that internal governance can mitigate agency problems. We combine these lines of research and examine whether the degree of cost stickiness in Chinese SOEs increases or decreases with implementation of party-building reform. Party-building reform elevates the status of the Party Decision Committee (PDC), an internal group of managers and staff representatives empowered to represent party interests. A more influential PDC may enhance political control while, at the same time, a stronger PDC may serve an internal governance role that mitigates agency-related problems. Our results provide evidence that cost stickiness is significantly lower in SOEs after implementation of party-building reform, supporting an internal governance effect as opposed to a political control effect of the PDC on management decision-making. Our evidence indicates that the reduction in cost stickiness occurs when the PDC is more independent from managers and more actively engaged in governance. Further analysis shows that the effect of PDC internal governance is more pronounced in firms where agency problems are apparently greater, traditional governance mechanisms are weaker and political influence is lower, supporting our main results.
国有企业的政治控制与内部治理:来自中国党建改革的证据
以往的研究发现,存在与政治控制相关的代理问题的国有企业的运营效率低于其他企业。其他研究表明,内部治理可以缓解代理问题。我们将这些研究结合起来,考察中国国有企业的成本粘性程度是随着党建改革的实施而增加还是减少。党的建设改革提升了党的决策委员会的地位,这是一个由管理人员和员工代表组成的内部组织,有权代表党的利益。一个更有影响力的PDC可能会加强政治控制,而与此同时,一个更强大的PDC可能会发挥内部治理作用,减轻与代理相关的问题。我们的研究结果表明,实施党建改革后,国有企业的成本粘性显著降低,这支持了PDC对管理决策的内部治理效应,而不是政治控制效应。我们的证据表明,当PDC更独立于管理者并更积极地参与治理时,成本粘性就会降低。进一步分析表明,在代理问题明显较大、传统治理机制较弱、政治影响力较低的企业中,PDC内部治理的效果更为明显,支持了我们的主要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Management Accounting Research aims to serve as a vehicle for publishing original research in the field of management accounting. Its contributions include case studies, field work, and other empirical research, analytical modelling, scholarly papers, distinguished review articles, comments, and notes. It provides an international forum for the dissemination of research, with papers written by prestigious international authors discussing and analysing management accounting in many different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信