Simplified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Intraoperative Fluid Management

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hilary Gallin MD, MBA , Marcus V. Ortega MD , Rachel Sisodia MD , Jason H. Wasfy MD MPhil , Jeffrey Ecker MD , Michael Dezube MEng , Michael K. Hidrue PhD , Marcela G. del Carmen MD, MPH , Dan B. Ellis MD
{"title":"Simplified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Intraoperative Fluid Management","authors":"Hilary Gallin MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Marcus V. Ortega MD ,&nbsp;Rachel Sisodia MD ,&nbsp;Jason H. Wasfy MD MPhil ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Ecker MD ,&nbsp;Michael Dezube MEng ,&nbsp;Michael K. Hidrue PhD ,&nbsp;Marcela G. del Carmen MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Dan B. Ellis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluates the efficacy of a simplified intraoperative fluid administration metric within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways. The objective is to optimize fluid management to improve postoperative outcomes, specifically kidney function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective evaluation was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital on adult patients who underwent open hysterectomy, colectomy, and gastrectomy as part of ERAS pathways. The proposed fluid metric, set at 500 mL/h, was assessed against traditional methods of fluid administration. Data on serum creatinine (Cr) changes as defined as the difference between the baseline value and the maximum value within 1 week of surgery were collected, and compliance with the metric was monitored. Analysis involved Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and quantile regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 1028 patients. Regression analysis indicated that compared to patients who received the optimal fluid quantity, those receiving below the optimal range showed an absolute increase in median Cr levels of 0.03 mg/dl (95% confidence interval = −0.005, 0.05) while those who received above the optimal range demonstrated an absolute increase in median Cr level of 0.01 (95% confidence interval = −0.03, 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The new fluid metric demonstrated a balanced approach to fluid administration, reducing the risk of overhydration while maintaining sufficient hydration. Additionally, implementing a simplified fluid metric of 500 mL/h in ERAS pathways is effective in improving postoperative kidney function. This approach facilitates adherence to fluid guidelines and can be applied across various healthcare settings. This metric serves as a practical, evidence-based pathway for fluid administration for most patients undergoing most ERAS procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002248042500023X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluates the efficacy of a simplified intraoperative fluid administration metric within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways. The objective is to optimize fluid management to improve postoperative outcomes, specifically kidney function.

Methods

A retrospective evaluation was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital on adult patients who underwent open hysterectomy, colectomy, and gastrectomy as part of ERAS pathways. The proposed fluid metric, set at 500 mL/h, was assessed against traditional methods of fluid administration. Data on serum creatinine (Cr) changes as defined as the difference between the baseline value and the maximum value within 1 week of surgery were collected, and compliance with the metric was monitored. Analysis involved Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and quantile regression.

Results

The study included 1028 patients. Regression analysis indicated that compared to patients who received the optimal fluid quantity, those receiving below the optimal range showed an absolute increase in median Cr levels of 0.03 mg/dl (95% confidence interval = −0.005, 0.05) while those who received above the optimal range demonstrated an absolute increase in median Cr level of 0.01 (95% confidence interval = −0.03, 0.05).

Conclusions

The new fluid metric demonstrated a balanced approach to fluid administration, reducing the risk of overhydration while maintaining sufficient hydration. Additionally, implementing a simplified fluid metric of 500 mL/h in ERAS pathways is effective in improving postoperative kidney function. This approach facilitates adherence to fluid guidelines and can be applied across various healthcare settings. This metric serves as a practical, evidence-based pathway for fluid administration for most patients undergoing most ERAS procedures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信