{"title":"Adiabatic Index in Fluid Models of Collisionless Black Hole Accretion","authors":"Charles F. Gammie","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/adaea3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of highly sub-Eddington accretion onto black holes commonly use a single-fluid model for the collisionless, near-horizon plasma. These models must specify an equation of state. It is common to use an ideal gas with <italic toggle=\"yes\">p</italic> = (<italic toggle=\"yes\">γ</italic> − 1)<italic toggle=\"yes\">u</italic> and <italic toggle=\"yes\">γ</italic> = 4/3, 13/9, or 5/3, but these produce significantly different outcomes. We discuss the origins of this discrepancy and the assumptions underlying the single-fluid model. The main result of this investigation is that under conditions relevant to low-luminosity black hole accretion the best choice of single-fluid adiabatic index is close to but slightly less than 5/3. Along the way we provide a simple equilibrium model for the relation between the ion-to-electron dissipation ratio and the ion-to-electron temperature ratio, and explore the implications for electron temperature fluctuations in Event Horizon Telescope sources.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adaea3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Models of highly sub-Eddington accretion onto black holes commonly use a single-fluid model for the collisionless, near-horizon plasma. These models must specify an equation of state. It is common to use an ideal gas with p = (γ − 1)u and γ = 4/3, 13/9, or 5/3, but these produce significantly different outcomes. We discuss the origins of this discrepancy and the assumptions underlying the single-fluid model. The main result of this investigation is that under conditions relevant to low-luminosity black hole accretion the best choice of single-fluid adiabatic index is close to but slightly less than 5/3. Along the way we provide a simple equilibrium model for the relation between the ion-to-electron dissipation ratio and the ion-to-electron temperature ratio, and explore the implications for electron temperature fluctuations in Event Horizon Telescope sources.