Homeopathic Treatment of Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Sagarika Muduli, Sanjib Sarkar, Rajat Kumar Pal, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Sk Monsur Alam, Subhranil Saha, Satyajit Naskar, Suhasish Roy, Ankit Saha, Indrani Halder, Priyanka Ghosh, Abdur Rahaman Shaikh, Munmun Koley, Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee
{"title":"Homeopathic Treatment of Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sagarika Muduli, Sanjib Sarkar, Rajat Kumar Pal, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Sk Monsur Alam, Subhranil Saha, Satyajit Naskar, Suhasish Roy, Ankit Saha, Indrani Halder, Priyanka Ghosh, Abdur Rahaman Shaikh, Munmun Koley, Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To detect differences between individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) and placebo after 4 months of intervention in patients with chronic low-back pain (LBP). <b><i>Design:</i></b> Four-month, double-blind, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled, two parallel arms trial. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> PG3 and research outpatient department of D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Sixty participants with chronic LBP. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Verum (<i>n</i> = 30; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus control (<i>n</i> = 30; placebos plus concomitant care). <b><i>Outcome Measures:</i></b> Primary-Oswestry LBP Disability Questionnaire (ODQ); Secondary-Roland Morris Pain and Disability Questionnaire (RMPDQ); McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (SF-MPQ); measured at baseline, and every month, up to 4 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Group differences achieved significance or near significance in all the specified outcomes-ODQ score (<i>F</i><sub>1, 58</sub> = 4.331, <i>p</i> = 0.042), RMPDQ score (<i>F</i><sub>1, 58</sub> = 2.939, <i>p</i> = 0.092), and SF-MPQ total score (<i>F</i><sub>1, 58</sub> = 6.666, <i>p</i> = 0.012). <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> (<i>n</i> = 13), <i>Bryonia alba</i> (<i>n</i> = 8), <i>Hypericum perforatum,</i> and <i>Nux vomica</i> (<i>n</i> = 5 each) were the most frequently prescribed medicines. Different repertories were used as per the need of the cases-Kent, Synthesis, Murphy, Pulford, Boericke, Boger Boenninghausen's Characteristics and Repertory, and Complete. Minor adverse events were reported from either group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Thus, homeopathic medicines worked significantly better than placebos in reducing chronic LBP. Independent replications are warranted to substantiate the findings. <b><i>Clinical Trial Registration Number:</i></b> CTRI/2022/04/041878.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"565-576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To detect differences between individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) and placebo after 4 months of intervention in patients with chronic low-back pain (LBP). Design: Four-month, double-blind, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled, two parallel arms trial. Setting: PG3 and research outpatient department of D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital. Subjects: Sixty participants with chronic LBP. Interventions: Verum (n = 30; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus control (n = 30; placebos plus concomitant care). Outcome Measures: Primary-Oswestry LBP Disability Questionnaire (ODQ); Secondary-Roland Morris Pain and Disability Questionnaire (RMPDQ); McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (SF-MPQ); measured at baseline, and every month, up to 4 months. Results: Group differences achieved significance or near significance in all the specified outcomes-ODQ score (F1, 58 = 4.331, p = 0.042), RMPDQ score (F1, 58 = 2.939, p = 0.092), and SF-MPQ total score (F1, 58 = 6.666, p = 0.012). Rhus toxicodendron (n = 13), Bryonia alba (n = 8), Hypericum perforatum, and Nux vomica (n = 5 each) were the most frequently prescribed medicines. Different repertories were used as per the need of the cases-Kent, Synthesis, Murphy, Pulford, Boericke, Boger Boenninghausen's Characteristics and Repertory, and Complete. Minor adverse events were reported from either group. Conclusions: Thus, homeopathic medicines worked significantly better than placebos in reducing chronic LBP. Independent replications are warranted to substantiate the findings. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2022/04/041878.

顺势疗法治疗慢性腰痛:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
目的:检测个体化顺势疗法药物(IHMPs)与安慰剂在慢性腰痛(LBP)患者干预4个月后的差异。设计:四个月,双盲,随机(1:1),安慰剂对照,双平行臂试验。单位:D. N. De顺势医学院附属医院PG3及研究门诊部。对象:60例慢性腰痛患者。干预措施:Verum (n = 30;ihmp加伴随治疗组与对照组(n = 30;安慰剂加伴随治疗)。结果测量:Primary-Oswestry LBP残疾问卷(ODQ);roland Morris疼痛与残疾问卷(RMPDQ);McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ);在基线时测量,每月测量,直至4个月。结果:组间odq评分(F1, 58 = 4.331, p = 0.042)、RMPDQ评分(F1, 58 = 2.939, p = 0.092)、SF-MPQ总分(F1, 58 = 6.666, p = 0.012)均有显著或接近显著差异。用药频次最高的是毒藤(n = 13)、白苔藓(n = 8)、贯叶连翘(n = 5)和马钱子(n = 5)。不同的剧目被使用根据需要的情况-肯特,合成,墨菲,普尔福德,Boericke, Boger Boenninghausen的特点和剧目,和完成。两组均报告轻微不良事件。结论:因此,顺势疗法药物在减轻慢性腰痛方面的效果明显优于安慰剂。有理由进行独立的重复实验来证实这些发现。临床试验注册号:CTRI/2022/04/041878。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信