Hearing Preservation and Functional Outcomes After Resection of Epidermoid Lesions of the Cerebellopontine Angle With High Hearing Risk.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004408
Michael Papazian, Justin Cottrell, Jackie Yang, Emily Kay-Rivest, David R Friedmann, Daniel Jethanamest, Douglas Kondziolka, Donato Pacione, Chandranath Sen, John G Golfinos, J Thomas Roland, Sean O McMenomey
{"title":"Hearing Preservation and Functional Outcomes After Resection of Epidermoid Lesions of the Cerebellopontine Angle With High Hearing Risk.","authors":"Michael Papazian, Justin Cottrell, Jackie Yang, Emily Kay-Rivest, David R Friedmann, Daniel Jethanamest, Douglas Kondziolka, Donato Pacione, Chandranath Sen, John G Golfinos, J Thomas Roland, Sean O McMenomey","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess a decade of experience of treating patients with high hearing risk cerebellopontine angle (CPA) epidermoid lesions and examine factors influencing postoperative outcomes, particularly hearing preservation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary-referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with CPA epidermoid lesions who presented with hearing loss or evidence of lesion involving vestibulocochlear nerve.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The studied intervention was microsurgical resection.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Main outcome measures included extent of resection, hearing preservation rate for patients with postoperative audiograms, and disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three adults with an average tumor volume of 15.63 ± 16.2 cm3 were included. Five lesions (22%) involved the full internal auditory canal (IAC), 11 (48%) had partial involvement, and 5 (22%) were IAC sparing. Most patients with IAC involvement (88%) had circumferential invasion of the canal. Patients underwent either a retrosigmoid (18, 79%) or combined retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal approach (5, 22%), and gross total resection was achieved in most cases (13, 57%). Of 12 patients with postoperative audiograms, 10 (83%) had preoperative hearing preserved. There was no statistically significant change in hearing scores with treatment based on preoperative extent of IAC involvement. Ten patients (43%) had residual lesions postoperatively, and 6 exhibited progression. One patient ultimately required reoperation 6 years after initial surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative hearing was preserved in the majority of the patients who underwent resection of CPA epidermoids via a retrosigmoid or transpetrosal approach. CPA epidermoids often invaded the IAC; however, degree of invasion was not associated with hearing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 3","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess a decade of experience of treating patients with high hearing risk cerebellopontine angle (CPA) epidermoid lesions and examine factors influencing postoperative outcomes, particularly hearing preservation.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Single tertiary-referral center.

Patients: Adults with CPA epidermoid lesions who presented with hearing loss or evidence of lesion involving vestibulocochlear nerve.

Interventions: The studied intervention was microsurgical resection.

Main outcome measures: Main outcome measures included extent of resection, hearing preservation rate for patients with postoperative audiograms, and disease progression.

Results: Twenty-three adults with an average tumor volume of 15.63 ± 16.2 cm3 were included. Five lesions (22%) involved the full internal auditory canal (IAC), 11 (48%) had partial involvement, and 5 (22%) were IAC sparing. Most patients with IAC involvement (88%) had circumferential invasion of the canal. Patients underwent either a retrosigmoid (18, 79%) or combined retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal approach (5, 22%), and gross total resection was achieved in most cases (13, 57%). Of 12 patients with postoperative audiograms, 10 (83%) had preoperative hearing preserved. There was no statistically significant change in hearing scores with treatment based on preoperative extent of IAC involvement. Ten patients (43%) had residual lesions postoperatively, and 6 exhibited progression. One patient ultimately required reoperation 6 years after initial surgery.

Conclusions: Preoperative hearing was preserved in the majority of the patients who underwent resection of CPA epidermoids via a retrosigmoid or transpetrosal approach. CPA epidermoids often invaded the IAC; however, degree of invasion was not associated with hearing outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信