Hormonal birth control is associated with altered gut microbiota β-diversity in physically active females across the menstrual cycle: a pilot trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2025
Julian Brito, Gregory J Grosicki, Austin T Robinson, Jared W Coburn, Pablo B Costa, Kristen E Holmes, Gabrielle Lyon, Zoe Hakonsson, Federica Conti, Andrew J Galpin
{"title":"Hormonal birth control is associated with altered gut microbiota β-diversity in physically active females across the menstrual cycle: a pilot trial.","authors":"Julian Brito, Gregory J Grosicki, Austin T Robinson, Jared W Coburn, Pablo B Costa, Kristen E Holmes, Gabrielle Lyon, Zoe Hakonsson, Federica Conti, Andrew J Galpin","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding changes to gut microbiota composition in response to hormonal birth control (HBC) may provide insight into the microbial mechanisms underlying the metabolic effects of HBC, for example, altered short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. Athletes' unique physiological demands may interact with these microbial mechanisms in distinct ways; however, there is limited research on HBC and gut microbiota diversity and composition across different menstrual cycle phases in physically active females. A pilot cohort of physically active females using HBC (oral contraceptives, hormone-based intrauterine devices, or arm implants) and a control group not using HBC (<i>n</i> = 12 per group; 22 ± 2 yr, 24 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 22 ± 4 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i>s ≥ 0.496) provided fecal samples alongside self-reported menstrual phase and circulating sex hormones. α-diversity (microbial richness and evenness) was assessed using the Shannon index whereas β-diversity (microbial composition differences) was analyzed using PERMANOVA based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Circulating estrogen and luteinizing hormone increased from early (<i>days 1</i>-<i>5</i>) to mid-cycle (<i>days 12</i>-<i>17</i>) in both groups (time effect <i>P</i>s ≤ 0.01), with greater changes in Control (<i>P</i>s ≤ 0.046) than HBC (<i>P</i>s ≥ 0.231). Although no menstrual phase effect was observed on either diversity measure (<i>P</i>s ≥ 0.473), β-diversity differed between Control and HBC groups (<i>P</i> = 0.015), reflecting distinct gut microbiota profiles irrespective of menstrual phase. Seven taxa linked to SCFA production were less abundant in the HBC group (unadjusted <i>P</i>s ≤ 0.046), though significance was lost after adjusting for multiple comparisons. These findings suggest that in physically active females, hormonal contraception influences gut microbial composition, which may have downstream effects on metabolism and performance.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study is the first to investigate interactions between hormonal contraception and the gut microbiota in a cohort of physically active young females across the menstrual cycle. Our findings suggest that hormonal contraception may influence gut microbiota composition, potentially through a reduced relative abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa. Experimental studies are needed to confirm these associations and explore their potential implications for metabolism, health, and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"739-745"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding changes to gut microbiota composition in response to hormonal birth control (HBC) may provide insight into the microbial mechanisms underlying the metabolic effects of HBC, for example, altered short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. Athletes' unique physiological demands may interact with these microbial mechanisms in distinct ways; however, there is limited research on HBC and gut microbiota diversity and composition across different menstrual cycle phases in physically active females. A pilot cohort of physically active females using HBC (oral contraceptives, hormone-based intrauterine devices, or arm implants) and a control group not using HBC (n = 12 per group; 22 ± 2 yr, 24 ± 4 kg/m2 vs. 22 ± 4 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m2; Ps ≥ 0.496) provided fecal samples alongside self-reported menstrual phase and circulating sex hormones. α-diversity (microbial richness and evenness) was assessed using the Shannon index whereas β-diversity (microbial composition differences) was analyzed using PERMANOVA based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Circulating estrogen and luteinizing hormone increased from early (days 1-5) to mid-cycle (days 12-17) in both groups (time effect Ps ≤ 0.01), with greater changes in Control (Ps ≤ 0.046) than HBC (Ps ≥ 0.231). Although no menstrual phase effect was observed on either diversity measure (Ps ≥ 0.473), β-diversity differed between Control and HBC groups (P = 0.015), reflecting distinct gut microbiota profiles irrespective of menstrual phase. Seven taxa linked to SCFA production were less abundant in the HBC group (unadjusted Ps ≤ 0.046), though significance was lost after adjusting for multiple comparisons. These findings suggest that in physically active females, hormonal contraception influences gut microbial composition, which may have downstream effects on metabolism and performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to investigate interactions between hormonal contraception and the gut microbiota in a cohort of physically active young females across the menstrual cycle. Our findings suggest that hormonal contraception may influence gut microbiota composition, potentially through a reduced relative abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa. Experimental studies are needed to confirm these associations and explore their potential implications for metabolism, health, and performance.

激素节育与月经周期体力活动女性肠道微生物群β多样性改变有关:一项试点试验
了解激素节育(HBC)对肠道菌群组成的影响,可能有助于深入了解HBC代谢作用的微生物机制,例如短链脂肪酸(SCFA)产生的改变。运动员独特的生理需求可能以不同的方式与这些微生物机制相互作用;然而,对体力活动女性不同月经周期阶段的HBC和肠道微生物群多样性和组成的研究有限。一组使用HBC(口服避孕药、基于激素的宫内节育器或手臂植入物)的体力活动女性和一组不使用HBC的对照组(每组n=12;22±2年,24±4kg/m2 vs. 22±4年,23±4kg/m2;Ps≥0.496)提供了粪便样本以及自我报告的月经期和循环性激素。采用Shannon指数评价α多样性(微生物丰富度和均匀度),采用基于布雷-柯蒂斯差异的PERMANOVA分析β多样性(微生物组成差异)。两组循环雌激素和黄体生成素在周期早期(1 ~ 5 d)至周期中期(12 ~ 17 d)均升高(时间效应Ps≤0.01),其中对照组(Ps≤0.046)高于HBC组(Ps≥0.231)。尽管两种多样性指标均未观察到月经期的影响(P≥0.473),但对照组和HBC组之间的β -多样性存在差异(P=0.015),这反映了不同月经期肠道微生物群的不同特征。7个与SCFA产生相关的类群在HBC组中较少(未经调整的Ps≤0.046),但经过多次比较调整后,显著性丧失。这些发现表明,在体力活动的女性中,激素避孕会影响肠道微生物组成,这可能对新陈代谢和工作表现产生下游影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信