Effect of different head position during tracheal intubation on postoperative sore throat: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.3
Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2464943
Tao Shan, Huimin Zhang, Xiao Zhou, Hongguang Bao, Liu Han, Chuan Su, Qilian Tan, Jun Yin, Tao Dan
{"title":"Effect of different head position during tracheal intubation on postoperative sore throat: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Tao Shan, Huimin Zhang, Xiao Zhou, Hongguang Bao, Liu Han, Chuan Su, Qilian Tan, Jun Yin, Tao Dan","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2464943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative sore throat is the most frequently complaint after tracheal intubation. We aimed to determine whether changing patients' head position during intubation reduces the incidence of postoperative sore throat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 130 patients receiving oral tracheal intubation into one of the two groups: the sniffing position group and elevation position group. Patients in the sniffing position group maintained sniffing position consistently during intubation, while those in the elevation position group transitioned from the sniffing position to the elevation position during tube advancement to the trachea. The primary outcome was incidence of airway trauma and postoperative sore throat (none/mild/moderate/severe) 1 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative sore throat at 6 h,12 h and 24 h, and hoarseness at 1 h, 6 h,12 h and 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-eight patients completed our trial. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients between the sniffing position and elevation position group [51 (14.8) vs 53 (15.5) for age, 25/39 vs 26/38 for sex (male/female)]. No difference in basic airway condition was observed. Transitioning patient's head from sniffing to elevation position during tube advancement to tracheal resulted in a significantly lower incidence of airway trauma [10/64 vs 23/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.76 (0.61-0.94), <i>p</i> = 0.009], postoperative sore throat and hoarseness compared with maintaining the sniffing position at 1 h [10/64 vs 30/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.63 (0.49-0.81), <i>p</i> < 0.001 for sore throat; 22/64 vs 34/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.71 (0.52-0.98), <i>p</i> = 0.044 for hoarseness] and 6 h [4/64 vs 17/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.78 (0.67-0.92), <i>p</i> = 0.006 for sore throat; 12/64 vs 27/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.71 (0.56-0.91), <i>p</i> = 0.002 for hoarseness]. There were no significant differences in postoperative sore throat and hoarseness at 12 and 24 h between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transitioning patients' head position from the sniffing position to a head elevation position during tube advancement into tracheal could significantly reduce the incidence of airway trauma, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2300073198.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2464943"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2464943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative sore throat is the most frequently complaint after tracheal intubation. We aimed to determine whether changing patients' head position during intubation reduces the incidence of postoperative sore throat.

Methods: We randomized 130 patients receiving oral tracheal intubation into one of the two groups: the sniffing position group and elevation position group. Patients in the sniffing position group maintained sniffing position consistently during intubation, while those in the elevation position group transitioned from the sniffing position to the elevation position during tube advancement to the trachea. The primary outcome was incidence of airway trauma and postoperative sore throat (none/mild/moderate/severe) 1 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative sore throat at 6 h,12 h and 24 h, and hoarseness at 1 h, 6 h,12 h and 24 h postoperatively.

Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients completed our trial. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients between the sniffing position and elevation position group [51 (14.8) vs 53 (15.5) for age, 25/39 vs 26/38 for sex (male/female)]. No difference in basic airway condition was observed. Transitioning patient's head from sniffing to elevation position during tube advancement to tracheal resulted in a significantly lower incidence of airway trauma [10/64 vs 23/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.76 (0.61-0.94), p = 0.009], postoperative sore throat and hoarseness compared with maintaining the sniffing position at 1 h [10/64 vs 30/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.63 (0.49-0.81), p < 0.001 for sore throat; 22/64 vs 34/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.71 (0.52-0.98), p = 0.044 for hoarseness] and 6 h [4/64 vs 17/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.78 (0.67-0.92), p = 0.006 for sore throat; 12/64 vs 27/64, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.71 (0.56-0.91), p = 0.002 for hoarseness]. There were no significant differences in postoperative sore throat and hoarseness at 12 and 24 h between the two groups.

Conclusions: Transitioning patients' head position from the sniffing position to a head elevation position during tube advancement into tracheal could significantly reduce the incidence of airway trauma, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300073198.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

气管插管时不同头位对术后咽喉痛的影响:一项随机临床试验。
简介:术后喉咙痛是气管插管后最常见的主诉。我们的目的是确定在插管过程中改变患者的头部位置是否可以减少术后喉咙痛的发生率。方法:将130例经口气管插管患者随机分为嗅位组和抬高位组。嗅探体位组患者在插管过程中始终保持嗅探体位,而抬高体位组患者在气管推进过程中由嗅探体位过渡到抬高体位。主要观察指标为术后1小时气道损伤和术后喉咙痛(无/轻度/中度/重度)的发生率。次要结局为术后6 h、12 h、24 h喉咙痛发生率,术后1 h、6 h、12 h、24 h声音嘶哑发生率。结果:128名患者完成了我们的试验。嗅探体位组和抬高体位组患者的基线特征无差异[年龄51 (14.8)vs 53(15.5),性别25/39 vs 26/38(男/女)]。两组基本气道状况无差异。转移病人的头从嗅探到海拔位置在气管管进步导致气道损伤的发生率明显降低(10/64和23/64,风险率(95% CI): 0.76 (0.61 - -0.94), p = 0.009),术后咽喉痛,声音沙哑而维护嗅位置1 h(10/64和30/64,风险率(95% CI): 0.63(0.49 - -0.81),声音沙哑p p = 0.044)和6 h(4/64和17/64,风险率(95% CI): 0.78 (0.67 - -0.92), p = 0.006喉咙痛;12/64 vs 27/64,风险比(95% CI): 0.71(0.56-0.91),沙哑的p = 0.002。术后12、24 h两组患者嗓子痛、声音嘶哑无明显差异。结论:在气管推进过程中,将患者的头部体位由吸气体位转变为仰卧体位,可显著降低气道创伤、术后喉咙痛和声音嘶哑的发生率。试验注册号:ChiCTR2300073198。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信