Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry.

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1915
Michael R Rickels, Cassandra M Ballou, Nicole C Foster, Rodolfo Alejandro, David A Baidal, Melena D Bellin, Thomas L Eggerman, Bernhard J Hering, Fouad Kandeel, Adam Brand, Kellee M Miller, Franca B Barton, Elizabeth H Payne
{"title":"Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry.","authors":"Michael R Rickels, Cassandra M Ballou, Nicole C Foster, Rodolfo Alejandro, David A Baidal, Melena D Bellin, Thomas L Eggerman, Bernhard J Hering, Fouad Kandeel, Adam Brand, Kellee M Miller, Franca B Barton, Elizabeth H Payne","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Islet transplantation was recently US Food and Drug Administration approved for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycemia events (SHEs). We sought to understand the long-term benefit for glycemic control and risk of immunosuppression to kidney function associated with islet transplantation compared with ongoing standard of care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We performed a case-control analysis of prospectively collected data from patients in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) with at least one SHE in the year (2000-2014) before transplantation (cases) and compared them with data from patients in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) Registry with at least one SHE in the year (2010-2012) before enrollment (controls), with both cohorts observed over 5 years. SHEs were restricted to those resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cases from CITR (n = 71) compared with controls from T1DX (n = 213) more often achieved the primary outcome of HbA1c <7.0% and absence of an SHE (71-80 vs. 21-33% over 5 years; P < 0.001) and the outcome of HbA1c ≤6.5% and absence of an SHE (60-75% vs. 10-20%; P < 0.001) while requiring significantly less insulin (majority in CITR were insulin independent). Kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, declined from baseline to a greater extent in CITR than in T1DX (-8.8 to -20 vs. -1.3 to -6.5 mL ⋅ min-1 ⋅ 1.73 m-2 over 5 years; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Islet transplantation for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs results in near-normal glycemic control in the absence of SHEs more often than observed with standard of care, but at the cost of greater reduction in kidney function.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Islet transplantation was recently US Food and Drug Administration approved for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycemia events (SHEs). We sought to understand the long-term benefit for glycemic control and risk of immunosuppression to kidney function associated with islet transplantation compared with ongoing standard of care.

Research design and methods: We performed a case-control analysis of prospectively collected data from patients in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) with at least one SHE in the year (2000-2014) before transplantation (cases) and compared them with data from patients in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) Registry with at least one SHE in the year (2010-2012) before enrollment (controls), with both cohorts observed over 5 years. SHEs were restricted to those resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness.

Results: Cases from CITR (n = 71) compared with controls from T1DX (n = 213) more often achieved the primary outcome of HbA1c <7.0% and absence of an SHE (71-80 vs. 21-33% over 5 years; P < 0.001) and the outcome of HbA1c ≤6.5% and absence of an SHE (60-75% vs. 10-20%; P < 0.001) while requiring significantly less insulin (majority in CITR were insulin independent). Kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, declined from baseline to a greater extent in CITR than in T1DX (-8.8 to -20 vs. -1.3 to -6.5 mL ⋅ min-1 ⋅ 1.73 m-2 over 5 years; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Islet transplantation for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs results in near-normal glycemic control in the absence of SHEs more often than observed with standard of care, but at the cost of greater reduction in kidney function.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信