Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry.

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1915
Michael R Rickels, Cassandra M Ballou, Nicole C Foster, Rodolfo Alejandro, David A Baidal, Melena D Bellin, Thomas L Eggerman, Bernhard J Hering, Fouad Kandeel, Adam Brand, Kellee M Miller, Franca B Barton, Elizabeth H Payne
{"title":"Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry.","authors":"Michael R Rickels, Cassandra M Ballou, Nicole C Foster, Rodolfo Alejandro, David A Baidal, Melena D Bellin, Thomas L Eggerman, Bernhard J Hering, Fouad Kandeel, Adam Brand, Kellee M Miller, Franca B Barton, Elizabeth H Payne","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Islet transplantation was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycemia events (SHEs). We sought to understand the long-term benefit for glycemic control and risk of immunosuppression to kidney function associated with islet transplantation compared with ongoing standard of care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We performed a case-control analysis of prospectively collected data from patients in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) with at least one SHE in the year (2000-2014) before transplantation (case subjects) and compared them with data from patients in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) Registry with at least one SHE in the year (2010-2012) before enrollment (control subjects), with both cohorts observed over 5 years. SHEs were restricted to those resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case subjects from CITR (n = 71) compared with control subjects from T1DX (n = 213) more often achieved the primary outcome of HbA1c <7.0% and absence of an SHE (71-80% vs. 21-33% over 5 years; P < 0.001) and the outcome of HbA1c ≤6.5% and absence of an SHE (60-75% vs. 10-20%; P < 0.001) while requiring significantly less insulin (majority in CITR were insulin independent). Kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, declined from baseline to a greater extent in CITR than in T1DX (-8.8 to -20 vs. -1.3 to -6.5 mL ⋅ min-1 ⋅ 1.73 m-2 over 5 years; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Islet transplantation for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs results in near-normal glycemic control in the absence of SHEs more often than observed with standard of care, but at the cost of greater reduction in kidney function.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"737-744"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Islet transplantation was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycemia events (SHEs). We sought to understand the long-term benefit for glycemic control and risk of immunosuppression to kidney function associated with islet transplantation compared with ongoing standard of care.

Research design and methods: We performed a case-control analysis of prospectively collected data from patients in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) with at least one SHE in the year (2000-2014) before transplantation (case subjects) and compared them with data from patients in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) Registry with at least one SHE in the year (2010-2012) before enrollment (control subjects), with both cohorts observed over 5 years. SHEs were restricted to those resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness.

Results: Case subjects from CITR (n = 71) compared with control subjects from T1DX (n = 213) more often achieved the primary outcome of HbA1c <7.0% and absence of an SHE (71-80% vs. 21-33% over 5 years; P < 0.001) and the outcome of HbA1c ≤6.5% and absence of an SHE (60-75% vs. 10-20%; P < 0.001) while requiring significantly less insulin (majority in CITR were insulin independent). Kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, declined from baseline to a greater extent in CITR than in T1DX (-8.8 to -20 vs. -1.3 to -6.5 mL ⋅ min-1 ⋅ 1.73 m-2 over 5 years; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Islet transplantation for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs results in near-normal glycemic control in the absence of SHEs more often than observed with standard of care, but at the cost of greater reduction in kidney function.

胰岛移植与1型糖尿病合并严重低血糖的标准护理比较,来自合作胰岛移植登记和T1D交换登记。
目的:胰岛移植最近被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于治疗成人1型糖尿病合并复发性严重低血糖事件(SHEs)。我们试图了解与正在进行的标准治疗相比,胰岛移植对血糖控制的长期益处和对肾功能的免疫抑制风险。研究设计和方法:我们对移植前(2000-2014年)至少有1例SHE(病例)的协同胰岛移植登记处(CITR)患者的前瞻性数据进行了病例对照分析,并将其与入组前(2010-2012年)至少有1例SHE(对照)的T1D交换登记处(T1DX)患者的数据进行了比较,两个队列的观察时间均超过5年。她被限制在那些导致癫痫发作或失去意识的情况下。结果:与T1DX对照组(n = 213)相比,来自CITR的病例(n = 71)更容易达到HbA1c的主要结局。结论:与标准护理相比,成人1型糖尿病合并she的胰岛移植在没有she的情况下更容易达到接近正常的血糖控制,但代价是肾功能的更大下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信