Outcomes of Same-sitting bilateral Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery for renal stone in patients aged 70 years and above

C. Giulioni , V. De Stefano , O. Traxer , D. Ragoori , N. Gadzhiev , Y. Tanidir , T. Inoue , E. Emiliani , S. Bin Hamri , M. Amine Lakmichi , C. Mohan Vaddi , C. Tiong Heng , B. Soebhali , S. More , V. Sridharan , M. Ilker Gökce , A.N. Tursunkulov , A. Ganpule , G.M. Pirola , A. Naselli , D. Castellani
{"title":"Outcomes of Same-sitting bilateral Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery for renal stone in patients aged 70 years and above","authors":"C. Giulioni ,&nbsp;V. De Stefano ,&nbsp;O. Traxer ,&nbsp;D. Ragoori ,&nbsp;N. Gadzhiev ,&nbsp;Y. Tanidir ,&nbsp;T. Inoue ,&nbsp;E. Emiliani ,&nbsp;S. Bin Hamri ,&nbsp;M. Amine Lakmichi ,&nbsp;C. Mohan Vaddi ,&nbsp;C. Tiong Heng ,&nbsp;B. Soebhali ,&nbsp;S. More ,&nbsp;V. Sridharan ,&nbsp;M. Ilker Gökce ,&nbsp;A.N. Tursunkulov ,&nbsp;A. Ganpule ,&nbsp;G.M. Pirola ,&nbsp;A. Naselli ,&nbsp;D. Castellani","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate outcomes of same sitting Bilateral Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery (SSB-RISRS) for kidney stone in patients aged ≥70 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients with bilateral kidney stones who underwent SSB-RISRS in 21 centers (January 2015-June 2022). Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥70 years, bilateral kidney stones diagnosed due to either unilateral or bilateral symptomatic presentation. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1: patients aged 70–74 years, Group 2: patients aged ≥75 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 86 patients in Group 1 and 60 patients in Group 2. There was no difference between the groups for gender, ASA score, BMI, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, and positive preoperative urine culture. Group 2 had a significantly higher proportion of recurrent stone formers (54.7% vs 35.0%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03). A higher proportion of bilaterally pre-stented patients were present in group 2 (37.9% vs 18.6%). There was no difference in total operation time and rate of post-operative uni- and bilateral stent positioning. Surgery was discontinued in 15.1% and 18.3% of cases in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.773). Median length of postoperative stay was 2 days in both groups. The most frequent complication was fever requiring antibiotics and prolonged admission (10.5% in group 1 and 11.7% in group 2, p<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.99). Sepsis rate was 2.3% patients in group 1 and none in group 2. 1.2% in group 1 required a blood transfusion due to hematuria. Bilateral SFR was similar (60.0% vs 47.7%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.194).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SSB-RISRS in elderly patients demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with good bilateral SFR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"49 5","pages":"Article 501716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578625000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate outcomes of same sitting Bilateral Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery (SSB-RISRS) for kidney stone in patients aged ≥70 years.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with bilateral kidney stones who underwent SSB-RISRS in 21 centers (January 2015-June 2022). Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥70 years, bilateral kidney stones diagnosed due to either unilateral or bilateral symptomatic presentation. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1: patients aged 70–74 years, Group 2: patients aged ≥75 years.

Results

There were 86 patients in Group 1 and 60 patients in Group 2. There was no difference between the groups for gender, ASA score, BMI, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, and positive preoperative urine culture. Group 2 had a significantly higher proportion of recurrent stone formers (54.7% vs 35.0%, p = 0.03). A higher proportion of bilaterally pre-stented patients were present in group 2 (37.9% vs 18.6%). There was no difference in total operation time and rate of post-operative uni- and bilateral stent positioning. Surgery was discontinued in 15.1% and 18.3% of cases in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.773). Median length of postoperative stay was 2 days in both groups. The most frequent complication was fever requiring antibiotics and prolonged admission (10.5% in group 1 and 11.7% in group 2, p > 0.99). Sepsis rate was 2.3% patients in group 1 and none in group 2. 1.2% in group 1 required a blood transfusion due to hematuria. Bilateral SFR was similar (60.0% vs 47.7%, p = 0.194).

Conclusions

SSB-RISRS in elderly patients demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with good bilateral SFR.
70岁及以上患者同坐位双侧逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石的疗效。
目的评估年龄≥70岁的肾结石患者接受同坐双侧逆行肾内手术(SSB-RISRS)的疗效:纳入标准:年龄≥70岁,因单侧或双侧无症状表现而确诊为双侧肾结石的患者。患者分为两组。第1组:70-74岁患者,第2组:≥75岁患者:两组患者在性别、ASA评分、体重指数、合并症、主要症状和术前尿培养阳性等方面均无差异。第二组的复发性结石患者比例明显更高(54.7% 对 35.0%,P = 0.03)。第 2 组中双侧预留支架的患者比例更高(37.9% 对 18.6%)。总手术时间以及术后单侧和双侧支架定位率没有差异。第一组和第二组分别有 15.1% 和 18.3% 的病例终止了手术(p = 0.773)。两组患者术后住院时间的中位数均为 2 天。最常见的并发症是发烧,需要使用抗生素和延长住院时间(第一组为 10.5%,第二组为 11.7%,P > 0.99)。第一组中有 1.2% 的患者因血尿而需要输血。双侧 SFR 相似(60.0% vs 47.7%,P = 0.194):SSB-RISRS在老年患者中的安全性可接受,双侧SFR良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信