Inpatient ophthalmology consultations for candidemia: a literature review and opinion.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001128
Amit V Mishra, Graeme K Loh, David S Ehmann
{"title":"Inpatient ophthalmology consultations for candidemia: a literature review and opinion.","authors":"Amit V Mishra, Graeme K Loh, David S Ehmann","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To examine the role of the ophthalmologist in screening for ocular candidiasis in patients with Candidemia .</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent evidence has shown that previously published incidence rates of endophthalmitis in Candidemia were overestimating risk due to nonuniform guidelines. Newer data suggest a very low rate of endophthalmitis in the Candidemia population. There is currently a lack of definitive data proving that retinal findings lead to significant changes in the clinical management of patients with regards to systemic treatment and overall outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Given the low rates of endophthalmitis, minimal management changes with positive retinal findings, and recently published guidelines from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, we posit that ocular screening of all patients with Candidemia is not warranted. However, more research is required to better delineate high-risk features that could guide which patients would require ophthalmologic examination. Further collaboration between ophthalmology and infectious disease specialists is vital to create new evidence-based guidelines based on the recent data.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"161-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To examine the role of the ophthalmologist in screening for ocular candidiasis in patients with Candidemia .

Recent findings: Recent evidence has shown that previously published incidence rates of endophthalmitis in Candidemia were overestimating risk due to nonuniform guidelines. Newer data suggest a very low rate of endophthalmitis in the Candidemia population. There is currently a lack of definitive data proving that retinal findings lead to significant changes in the clinical management of patients with regards to systemic treatment and overall outcomes.

Summary: Given the low rates of endophthalmitis, minimal management changes with positive retinal findings, and recently published guidelines from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, we posit that ocular screening of all patients with Candidemia is not warranted. However, more research is required to better delineate high-risk features that could guide which patients would require ophthalmologic examination. Further collaboration between ophthalmology and infectious disease specialists is vital to create new evidence-based guidelines based on the recent data.

念珠菌的住院眼科会诊:文献回顾和观点。
本综述的目的:探讨眼科医生在念珠菌病患者眼部念珠菌病筛查中的作用。最近的发现:最近的证据表明,由于指南不统一,先前公布的念珠菌性眼内炎发病率高估了风险。最新的数据表明,念珠菌人群眼内炎的发生率非常低。目前缺乏明确的数据证明视网膜的发现会导致患者的临床管理在系统治疗和总体结果方面发生重大变化。摘要:鉴于眼内炎的发生率低,视网膜阳性的治疗改变很小,以及美国眼科学会最近发表的指南,我们认为对所有念珠菌病患者进行眼部筛查是不合理的。然而,需要更多的研究来更好地描述高风险特征,以指导哪些患者需要眼科检查。眼科和传染病专家之间的进一步合作对于根据最近的数据创建新的循证指南至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信