What Do We Know About the Stop Now and Plan Program? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of an Early Invention for Children and Youth with Conduct Problems.
IF 3 2区 医学Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stephanie G Craig, Katelyn Frankiewicz, Natalie R Stearns, Julie Girard-Lapointe, Allana Cortese, Natasha Vogel, Debra J Pepler
{"title":"What Do We Know About the Stop Now and Plan Program? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of an Early Invention for Children and Youth with Conduct Problems.","authors":"Stephanie G Craig, Katelyn Frankiewicz, Natalie R Stearns, Julie Girard-Lapointe, Allana Cortese, Natasha Vogel, Debra J Pepler","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01788-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children who engage in aggressive behaviors are at heightened risk of being involved in the justice system, committing serious offenses, and becoming chronic offenders. The Stop Now And Plan (SNAP) program was designed as an early intervention to address several mechanisms underlying the development of conduct problems, including emotion regulation, prosocial behaviors, and parent-child relationships. The purpose of this study was to systematically review and synthesize current research on the SNAP program and conduct a meta-analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and PyscINFO were searched, and the developers of SNAP were contacted to ensure no articles were missed. Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles were ultimately included following a two-stage screening process. The meta-analysis revealed a moderate effect size change (SMD = - 0.54, 95% CI [- .42, - .65], p < .001) in externalizing problems from pre- to post-SNAP Group. The narrative review found evidence for decreases in symptoms (e.g., conduct problems, aggression, delinquency, internalizing problems) across SNAP programming. There was also preliminary evidence for changes in proposed mechanisms across the groups (e.g., emotion regulation, parent behaviors, child-parent relationship). Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) supported the efficacy of the SNAP Boys Group over another active treatment. One waitlist control found similar results for the SNAP Girls Group. There is growing evidence for SNAP, attributable to the effective clinical research partnerships established by the developers. More rigorous methods and RCTs will help solidify SNAP as a top evidence-based intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01788-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Children who engage in aggressive behaviors are at heightened risk of being involved in the justice system, committing serious offenses, and becoming chronic offenders. The Stop Now And Plan (SNAP) program was designed as an early intervention to address several mechanisms underlying the development of conduct problems, including emotion regulation, prosocial behaviors, and parent-child relationships. The purpose of this study was to systematically review and synthesize current research on the SNAP program and conduct a meta-analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and PyscINFO were searched, and the developers of SNAP were contacted to ensure no articles were missed. Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles were ultimately included following a two-stage screening process. The meta-analysis revealed a moderate effect size change (SMD = - 0.54, 95% CI [- .42, - .65], p < .001) in externalizing problems from pre- to post-SNAP Group. The narrative review found evidence for decreases in symptoms (e.g., conduct problems, aggression, delinquency, internalizing problems) across SNAP programming. There was also preliminary evidence for changes in proposed mechanisms across the groups (e.g., emotion regulation, parent behaviors, child-parent relationship). Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) supported the efficacy of the SNAP Boys Group over another active treatment. One waitlist control found similar results for the SNAP Girls Group. There is growing evidence for SNAP, attributable to the effective clinical research partnerships established by the developers. More rigorous methods and RCTs will help solidify SNAP as a top evidence-based intervention.
期刊介绍：
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
