Delivering remote pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: a mixed-method feasibility study.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
G M Monsur Habib, Nazim Uzzaman, Roberto Rabinovich, Sumaiya Akhter, Mustari Sultana, Mohsin Ali, Hilary Pinnock
{"title":"Delivering remote pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: a mixed-method feasibility study.","authors":"G M Monsur Habib, Nazim Uzzaman, Roberto Rabinovich, Sumaiya Akhter, Mustari Sultana, Mohsin Ali, Hilary Pinnock","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective and essential component of care for the increasing number of individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). Despite the benefits, it remains underutilised and poorly accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to determine the feasibility of delivering PR in Bangladesh at home because of pandemic travel restrictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aligned with the Medical Research Council framework of development and evaluation of complex interventions, we recruited individuals with CRDs from the Community Respiratory Centre, Khulna, to a mixed-methods feasibility study. We assessed their functional exercise capacity and quality of life before and after an eight-week course of home PR, and conducted semi-structured interviews with PR providers and professional stakeholders by using a topic guide aligned with the normalisation process theory (NPT) and interpreting the findings within its constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 51 out of 61 referred patients with a range of CRDs, of whom 44 (86%) completed ≥70% of their home PR course. Functional exercise capacity, measured by the endurance shuttle walk test, improved in 78% of patients, with 48% exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Health-related quality of life, measured by the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, improved by more than the MCID in 83% of patients. Through the interviews, we found that PR providers encountered challenges in remote video supervision due to unstable internet connections, forcing them to resort to telephone calls. The strength of support for NPT constructs varied; many participants understood and appreciated the role of PR and could make sense of the innovation (NPT-1), and most were assessing the potential of a PR service in Bangladesh to decide if it was worthwhile (NPT-4). Participants were not yet ready to endorse or actively support (NPT-2) or operationalise (NPT-3) the roll-out of PR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A home PR programme, supported by remote supervision and monitoring, is feasible in Bangladesh, but local evidence will be needed to promote implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective and essential component of care for the increasing number of individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). Despite the benefits, it remains underutilised and poorly accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to determine the feasibility of delivering PR in Bangladesh at home because of pandemic travel restrictions.

Methods: Aligned with the Medical Research Council framework of development and evaluation of complex interventions, we recruited individuals with CRDs from the Community Respiratory Centre, Khulna, to a mixed-methods feasibility study. We assessed their functional exercise capacity and quality of life before and after an eight-week course of home PR, and conducted semi-structured interviews with PR providers and professional stakeholders by using a topic guide aligned with the normalisation process theory (NPT) and interpreting the findings within its constructs.

Results: We recruited 51 out of 61 referred patients with a range of CRDs, of whom 44 (86%) completed ≥70% of their home PR course. Functional exercise capacity, measured by the endurance shuttle walk test, improved in 78% of patients, with 48% exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Health-related quality of life, measured by the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, improved by more than the MCID in 83% of patients. Through the interviews, we found that PR providers encountered challenges in remote video supervision due to unstable internet connections, forcing them to resort to telephone calls. The strength of support for NPT constructs varied; many participants understood and appreciated the role of PR and could make sense of the innovation (NPT-1), and most were assessing the potential of a PR service in Bangladesh to decide if it was worthwhile (NPT-4). Participants were not yet ready to endorse or actively support (NPT-2) or operationalise (NPT-3) the roll-out of PR.

Conclusions: A home PR programme, supported by remote supervision and monitoring, is feasible in Bangladesh, but local evidence will be needed to promote implementation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信