Media Trust and Perceived Media Stress Among Filipino, Hungarian, and Iranian LGBTQ+ People: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Reza Shabahang, Marc Eric S Reyes, Mick B Brewer, Ma Criselda T Pacquing, Ágnes Buvár, Kata Gömbicz, Mara S Aruguete, Gabor Orosz, Ágnes Zsila
{"title":"Media Trust and Perceived Media Stress Among Filipino, Hungarian, and Iranian LGBTQ+ People: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study.","authors":"Reza Shabahang, Marc Eric S Reyes, Mick B Brewer, Ma Criselda T Pacquing, Ágnes Buvár, Kata Gömbicz, Mara S Aruguete, Gabor Orosz, Ágnes Zsila","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2452458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-cultural comparative study sought to estimate levels of media trust and perceived media stress and model the associations of these perceptions with coping self-efficacy, positive thinking, and negativity toward heterosexual individuals and society. A total of 1,153 self-identified LGBTQ+ individuals from three countries (Philippines, Hungary, Iran) where LGBTQ+ rights are restricted by governmental actions completed an online survey. Media trust was higher among Filipinos compared to Hungarians and Iranians. Perceived media stress was the highest in the Iranian sample. Mediation models revealed that lower media trust was associated with higher perceived media stress among Filipinos and Hungarians. When coping was added to the model, higher perceived media stress was associated with higher perceived ability to cope with negative attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people among Filipinos, which, in turn, was associated with more positive thinking. By contrast, higher perceived media stress was negatively associated with coping ability among Hungarians, though coping ability remained a predictor of positive thinking. Findings suggest that LGBTQ+ perceptions of the local media-regarding its trustworthiness and distressing nature-can be associated with individuals' self-assessment of coping abilities, relationships with heterosexuals and society, and positive outlook on life. However, the nature of these associations may be culture-specific.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2452458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-cultural comparative study sought to estimate levels of media trust and perceived media stress and model the associations of these perceptions with coping self-efficacy, positive thinking, and negativity toward heterosexual individuals and society. A total of 1,153 self-identified LGBTQ+ individuals from three countries (Philippines, Hungary, Iran) where LGBTQ+ rights are restricted by governmental actions completed an online survey. Media trust was higher among Filipinos compared to Hungarians and Iranians. Perceived media stress was the highest in the Iranian sample. Mediation models revealed that lower media trust was associated with higher perceived media stress among Filipinos and Hungarians. When coping was added to the model, higher perceived media stress was associated with higher perceived ability to cope with negative attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people among Filipinos, which, in turn, was associated with more positive thinking. By contrast, higher perceived media stress was negatively associated with coping ability among Hungarians, though coping ability remained a predictor of positive thinking. Findings suggest that LGBTQ+ perceptions of the local media-regarding its trustworthiness and distressing nature-can be associated with individuals' self-assessment of coping abilities, relationships with heterosexuals and society, and positive outlook on life. However, the nature of these associations may be culture-specific.

菲律宾、匈牙利和伊朗LGBTQ+人群的媒体信任和感知媒体压力:一个跨文化比较研究。
这项跨文化比较研究旨在评估媒体信任和感知媒体压力的水平,并建立这些感知与应对自我效能、对异性恋个体和社会的积极思考和消极态度之间的关联模型。来自三个LGBTQ+权利受到政府行为限制的国家(菲律宾、匈牙利、伊朗)的1153名自认为LGBTQ+的人完成了一项在线调查。菲律宾人对媒体的信任度高于匈牙利人和伊朗人。伊朗人感受到的媒体压力最大。中介模型显示,菲律宾人和匈牙利人较低的媒体信任与较高的感知媒体压力相关。当在模型中加入应对因素时,更高的感知媒体压力与更高的感知菲律宾人应对对LGBTQ+人群的负面态度的能力相关,而这种态度反过来又与更积极的思维相关。相比之下,匈牙利人较高的媒体压力感知与应对能力呈负相关,尽管应对能力仍然是积极思考的预测因素。研究结果表明,LGBTQ+对当地媒体的看法——关于其可信度和令人痛苦的性质——可能与个体对应对能力、与异性恋者和社会的关系以及积极人生观的自我评估有关。然而,这些关联的性质可能是文化特有的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信