Corey G. Wadsley, Thuan Nguyen, Chris Horton, Ian Greenhouse
{"title":"Goal-directed action preparation in humans entails a mixture of corticospinal neural computations","authors":"Corey G. Wadsley, Thuan Nguyen, Chris Horton, Ian Greenhouse","doi":"10.1113/JP287939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>The seemingly effortless ability of humans to transition from thinking about actions to initiating them relies on sculpting corticospinal (CS) output from the primary motor cortex. The present study tested whether canonical additive and multiplicative neural computations, well-described in sensory systems, generalize to the CS pathway during human action preparation. We used non-invasive brain stimulation to measure CS input–output across varying action preparation contexts during instructed-delay finger response tasks. Goal-directed action preparation was marked by increased multiplicative gain of CS projections to task-relevant muscles and additive suppression of CS projections to non-selected and task-irrelevant muscles. Individuals who modulated CS gain to a greater extent were faster to initiate prepared responses. Our findings provide physiological evidence of combined additive suppression and gain modulation in the human motor system. We propose that these computations support action preparation by enhancing the contrast between selected motor representations and surrounding background activity to facilitate response selection and execution.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Neural computations determine what information is transmitted through brain circuits.</li>\n \n <li>We investigated whether the motor system uses computations similar to those observed in sensory systems by non-invasively stimulating the corticospinal pathway in humans during goal-directed action preparation.</li>\n \n <li>We discovered physiological evidence indicating that corticospinal projections to behaviourally relevant muscles exhibit non-linear gain computations, whereas projections to behaviourally irrelevant muscles exhibit linear suppression.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings suggest that certain computational principles generalize to the human motor system and serve to enhance the contrast between relevant and background neural activity.</li>\n \n <li>These results indicate that neural computations during goal-directed action preparation may support motor control by increasing signal-to-noise within the corticospinal pathway.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 6","pages":"1589-1605"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP287939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The seemingly effortless ability of humans to transition from thinking about actions to initiating them relies on sculpting corticospinal (CS) output from the primary motor cortex. The present study tested whether canonical additive and multiplicative neural computations, well-described in sensory systems, generalize to the CS pathway during human action preparation. We used non-invasive brain stimulation to measure CS input–output across varying action preparation contexts during instructed-delay finger response tasks. Goal-directed action preparation was marked by increased multiplicative gain of CS projections to task-relevant muscles and additive suppression of CS projections to non-selected and task-irrelevant muscles. Individuals who modulated CS gain to a greater extent were faster to initiate prepared responses. Our findings provide physiological evidence of combined additive suppression and gain modulation in the human motor system. We propose that these computations support action preparation by enhancing the contrast between selected motor representations and surrounding background activity to facilitate response selection and execution.
Key points
Neural computations determine what information is transmitted through brain circuits.
We investigated whether the motor system uses computations similar to those observed in sensory systems by non-invasively stimulating the corticospinal pathway in humans during goal-directed action preparation.
We discovered physiological evidence indicating that corticospinal projections to behaviourally relevant muscles exhibit non-linear gain computations, whereas projections to behaviourally irrelevant muscles exhibit linear suppression.
Our findings suggest that certain computational principles generalize to the human motor system and serve to enhance the contrast between relevant and background neural activity.
These results indicate that neural computations during goal-directed action preparation may support motor control by increasing signal-to-noise within the corticospinal pathway.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.