The relationship between students' personality traits, attention state, and use of regulatory strategies during emergent distance learning.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mona Emara, Susanne Schwab, Ghaleb Alnahdi, Cornelia Gerdenitsch
{"title":"The relationship between students' personality traits, attention state, and use of regulatory strategies during emergent distance learning.","authors":"Mona Emara, Susanne Schwab, Ghaleb Alnahdi, Cornelia Gerdenitsch","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02451-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attention issues are increasingly prevalent among students in higher education. While existing research has primarily focused on external distractions and their relationship with personality traits, internal distractions remain underexplored, particularly in the context of specific learning scenarios like distance education. This study addresses this gap by investigating the correlations between personality traits, attention distraction, and attentional regulation in the context of distance learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study adopted a combined person- and variable-oriented approach to examine the extent to which students' personalities relate to attentional state and regulation strategies during emergent distance learning under COVID-19 lockdown conditions. 400 higher education students completed an online survey for this cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integrated approaches revealed three distinct groups: (1) the \"Self-Attention Regulated\" group, characterized by the lowest attention problems, the highest use of attention regulation strategies, and higher levels of conscientiousness and openness; (2) the \"Hanging-On\" group, marked by high attention discontinuity, moderate attention regulation strategies, and average levels across all personality traits; and (3) the \"Social Media-Distracted\" group, exhibiting the highest levels of distraction caused by social media and higher levels of neuroticism. Older students, who tended to belong to the self-attention-regulated group, spent considerably more time studying online than younger students, who were more likely to be social media-distracted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study enhances our understanding of attention regulation in distance learning by identifying personality traits associated with students at risk for distracted attention issues. The results could help universities to design and implement effective distance learning programs that cater to a wide range of student personalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02451-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Attention issues are increasingly prevalent among students in higher education. While existing research has primarily focused on external distractions and their relationship with personality traits, internal distractions remain underexplored, particularly in the context of specific learning scenarios like distance education. This study addresses this gap by investigating the correlations between personality traits, attention distraction, and attentional regulation in the context of distance learning.

Method: This study adopted a combined person- and variable-oriented approach to examine the extent to which students' personalities relate to attentional state and regulation strategies during emergent distance learning under COVID-19 lockdown conditions. 400 higher education students completed an online survey for this cross-sectional study.

Results: The integrated approaches revealed three distinct groups: (1) the "Self-Attention Regulated" group, characterized by the lowest attention problems, the highest use of attention regulation strategies, and higher levels of conscientiousness and openness; (2) the "Hanging-On" group, marked by high attention discontinuity, moderate attention regulation strategies, and average levels across all personality traits; and (3) the "Social Media-Distracted" group, exhibiting the highest levels of distraction caused by social media and higher levels of neuroticism. Older students, who tended to belong to the self-attention-regulated group, spent considerably more time studying online than younger students, who were more likely to be social media-distracted.

Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of attention regulation in distance learning by identifying personality traits associated with students at risk for distracted attention issues. The results could help universities to design and implement effective distance learning programs that cater to a wide range of student personalities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信