The outcomes between cystic decompression and marsupialisation methods in odontogenic cysts and cyst-like tumours: A retrospective comparative study.

Q3 Medicine
Kannika Rungsaeng, Pisha Pittayapat, Sappasith Panya, Paksinee Kamolratanakul
{"title":"The outcomes between cystic decompression and marsupialisation methods in odontogenic cysts and cyst-like tumours: A retrospective comparative study.","authors":"Kannika Rungsaeng, Pisha Pittayapat, Sappasith Panya, Paksinee Kamolratanakul","doi":"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_136_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Marsupialization and decompression are treatments designed to reduce hydrostatic pressure which results in reducing the cystic size and increasing the bone density of the lesion.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the percentage of cystic size reduction and the percentage of change in radiographic density from marsupialisation and two types of decompression: tube drain and stent.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of panoramic films was conducted to evaluate cystic size and intralesional density.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were analysed from 40 cases, including 31 cases of odontogenic cyst and 9 cases of cyst-like tumour, treated at Chulalongkorn University's Faculty of Dentistry from 2009 to 2019. The percentage of cystic size reduction and percentage of change in radiographic density were analysed before the procedure and three months after treatment. The density and size of the odontogenic cysts were determined using Image J software version 1.43.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of cystic size reductions when using marsupialisation, decompression with a tube drain and decompression with a stent were 31.49 ± 7.43, 35.42 ± 10.58 and 30.99 ± 7.16, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.366). The percentage of change in radiographic density was 25.21 ± 7.04, 27.09 ± 7.96 and 24.94 ± 5.35, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.661). There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decompression with a tube drain yielded both the highest percentage of size reduction and the highest percentage of change in radiographic density in the cyst, although this better performance was not statistically significant. We recommend decompression with a tube drain, as it effectively maintains an open drainage pathway and prevents collapse of the cyst opening. This continuous release of hydrostatic pressure is beneficial in promoting gradual bone healing and regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":38846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","volume":"28 4","pages":"612-618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11819622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_136_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Marsupialization and decompression are treatments designed to reduce hydrostatic pressure which results in reducing the cystic size and increasing the bone density of the lesion.

Aims: To compare the percentage of cystic size reduction and the percentage of change in radiographic density from marsupialisation and two types of decompression: tube drain and stent.

Settings and design: Retrospective analysis of panoramic films was conducted to evaluate cystic size and intralesional density.

Materials and methods: Data were analysed from 40 cases, including 31 cases of odontogenic cyst and 9 cases of cyst-like tumour, treated at Chulalongkorn University's Faculty of Dentistry from 2009 to 2019. The percentage of cystic size reduction and percentage of change in radiographic density were analysed before the procedure and three months after treatment. The density and size of the odontogenic cysts were determined using Image J software version 1.43.

Statistical analysis: Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: The percentage of cystic size reductions when using marsupialisation, decompression with a tube drain and decompression with a stent were 31.49 ± 7.43, 35.42 ± 10.58 and 30.99 ± 7.16, respectively (P = 0.366). The percentage of change in radiographic density was 25.21 ± 7.04, 27.09 ± 7.96 and 24.94 ± 5.35, respectively (P = 0.661). There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups.

Conclusions: Decompression with a tube drain yielded both the highest percentage of size reduction and the highest percentage of change in radiographic density in the cyst, although this better performance was not statistically significant. We recommend decompression with a tube drain, as it effectively maintains an open drainage pathway and prevents collapse of the cyst opening. This continuous release of hydrostatic pressure is beneficial in promoting gradual bone healing and regeneration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

牙源性囊肿和囊肿样肿瘤的囊性减压和有袋化方法的疗效:回顾性比较研究。
背景:有袋化和减压是一种旨在减少静水压力的治疗方法,其结果是减少囊性大小并增加病变的骨密度。目的:比较有袋化和两种减压方式(管引流和支架)后囊性体积缩小的百分比和x线片密度变化的百分比。背景和设计:回顾性分析全景影像以评估囊性大小和病灶内密度。材料与方法:对朱拉隆功大学牙科学院2009 - 2019年收治的40例牙源性囊肿31例、囊肿样肿瘤9例进行数据分析。分析术前和治疗后3个月囊变小百分率和x线片密度变化百分率。采用Image J软件1.43版本测定牙源性囊肿的密度和大小。统计分析:采用Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析。结果:有袋术、引流减压术和支架减压术的囊性缩小率分别为31.49±7.43、35.42±10.58和30.99±7.16 (P = 0.366)。x线片密度变化百分比分别为25.21±7.04、27.09±7.96、24.94±5.35 (P = 0.661)。两组间的结果无统计学差异。结论:管引流减压能最大程度地减小囊肿的体积,同时也能最大程度地改变囊肿的x线密度,尽管这种更好的表现没有统计学意义。我们建议用管引流减压,因为它有效地保持开放的引流通道,防止囊肿开口塌陷。这种持续释放静水压力有利于促进骨逐渐愈合和再生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology [ISSN:print-(0973-029X, online-1998-393X)] is a tri-annual journal published on behalf of “The Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists” (IAOMP). The publication of JOMFP was started in the year 1993. The journal publishes papers on a wide spectrum of topics associated with the scope of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, also, ensuring scientific merit and quality. It is a comprehensive reading material for the professionals who want to upgrade their diagnostic skills in Oral Diseases; allows exposure to newer topics and methods of research in the Oral-facial Tissues and Pathology. New features allow an open minded thinking and approach to various pathologies. It also encourages authors to showcase quality work done by them and to compile relevant cases which are diagnostically challenging. The Journal takes pride in maintaining the quality of articles and photomicrographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信