Association of menthol-flavoured cigarette smoking with all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Priti Bandi, Christina Newton, Zheng Xue, Blake Thomson, Samuel Asare, Minal Patel, Farhad Islami, Nigar Nargis, Alpa V Patel, Ahmedin Jemal, Johann Lee Westmaas, W Ryan Diver
{"title":"Association of menthol-flavoured cigarette smoking with all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk.","authors":"Priti Bandi, Christina Newton, Zheng Xue, Blake Thomson, Samuel Asare, Minal Patel, Farhad Islami, Nigar Nargis, Alpa V Patel, Ahmedin Jemal, Johann Lee Westmaas, W Ryan Diver","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-059020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menthol-flavoured cigarettes remain unregulated in the USA and in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) despite their known impacts on smoking uptake and reduced cessation. Yet, evidence about whether menthol cigarettes are associated with higher disease risks than non-menthol cigarettes is inconclusive, and the industry has used this argument to lobby against regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All-cause and cause-specific mortality risk was assessed according to baseline smoking status (current, former and never) and menthol flavour status (menthol and non-menthol) of the cigarette brand smoked for the longest period among 969 349 persons from Cancer Prevention Study-II, a population-based prospective cohort study enrolled in 1982-1983 with mortality follow-up of 6 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73 486 and 281 680 persons reported menthol brands and non-menthol brands, respectively, among whom 4071 and 20 738 deaths occurred, respectively. Currently smoking cigarettes, whether menthol or non-menthol brands, was associated with highest mortality risks (eg, all causes: about two times higher risk vs never smoking) but quitting substantially reduced risks for both types. Among persons who formerly smoked, menthol versus non-menthol smoking was associated with an elevated mortality risk of 12% from all-causes, 16% from all cardiovascular diseases, 13% from ischaemic heart disease, and 43% from other heart diseases Among individuals currently smoking, there was no difference in mortality risks for menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes except for elevated risk among those smoking≥40 cigarettes per day. Black persons currently smoking menthol versus non-menthol brands had an 88% elevated mortality risk for other heart diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of a unique excess mortality risk associated with menthol cigarettes provide additional scientific evidence-apart from their known impacts on initiation and cessation-in support of menthol flavour regulation in the USA and similar policies in LMICs. Public communication efforts must reiterate that quitting all cigarette types is the only safe option to reduce disease risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-059020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Menthol-flavoured cigarettes remain unregulated in the USA and in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) despite their known impacts on smoking uptake and reduced cessation. Yet, evidence about whether menthol cigarettes are associated with higher disease risks than non-menthol cigarettes is inconclusive, and the industry has used this argument to lobby against regulation.

Methods: All-cause and cause-specific mortality risk was assessed according to baseline smoking status (current, former and never) and menthol flavour status (menthol and non-menthol) of the cigarette brand smoked for the longest period among 969 349 persons from Cancer Prevention Study-II, a population-based prospective cohort study enrolled in 1982-1983 with mortality follow-up of 6 years.

Results: 73 486 and 281 680 persons reported menthol brands and non-menthol brands, respectively, among whom 4071 and 20 738 deaths occurred, respectively. Currently smoking cigarettes, whether menthol or non-menthol brands, was associated with highest mortality risks (eg, all causes: about two times higher risk vs never smoking) but quitting substantially reduced risks for both types. Among persons who formerly smoked, menthol versus non-menthol smoking was associated with an elevated mortality risk of 12% from all-causes, 16% from all cardiovascular diseases, 13% from ischaemic heart disease, and 43% from other heart diseases Among individuals currently smoking, there was no difference in mortality risks for menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes except for elevated risk among those smoking≥40 cigarettes per day. Black persons currently smoking menthol versus non-menthol brands had an 88% elevated mortality risk for other heart diseases.

Conclusion: Findings of a unique excess mortality risk associated with menthol cigarettes provide additional scientific evidence-apart from their known impacts on initiation and cessation-in support of menthol flavour regulation in the USA and similar policies in LMICs. Public communication efforts must reiterate that quitting all cigarette types is the only safe option to reduce disease risk.

薄荷味香烟与全因和特定病因死亡风险的关系。
导言:薄荷味香烟在美国和许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)仍然不受管制,尽管它们已知对吸烟吸收和减少戒烟有影响。然而,关于薄荷香烟是否比非薄荷香烟与更高的疾病风险相关的证据尚无定论,烟草业利用这一论点游说反对监管。方法:根据基线吸烟状况(现在、以前和从不吸烟)和吸烟时间最长的香烟品牌的薄荷口味状况(薄荷和非薄荷),对来自癌症预防研究ii的969349人进行全因和特定原因的死亡风险评估。癌症预防研究ii是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,于1982-1983年纳入,死亡率随访6年。结果:报告薄荷醇品牌和非薄荷醇品牌的人数分别为73 486人和281 680人,其中死亡人数分别为4071人和20 738人。目前吸烟,无论是薄荷还是非薄荷品牌的香烟,都与最高的死亡风险相关(例如,所有原因:与从不吸烟相比,风险大约高出两倍),但戒烟大大降低了这两种类型的风险。在以前吸烟的人群中,薄荷醇与非薄荷醇吸烟与全因死亡风险升高相关,全因死亡风险升高12%,心血管疾病死亡风险升高16%,缺血性心脏病死亡风险升高13%,其他心脏病死亡风险升高43%。在目前吸烟的人群中,薄荷醇与非薄荷醇香烟的死亡风险没有差异,除了每天吸烟≥40支的风险升高。与非薄荷醇品牌相比,目前吸烟薄荷醇的黑人患其他心脏病的死亡率高出88%。结论:除了已知的对开始和停止吸烟的影响外,与薄荷香烟相关的独特的额外死亡风险的发现提供了额外的科学证据,支持美国的薄荷香料监管和中低收入国家的类似政策。公众宣传工作必须重申,戒烟是减少疾病风险的唯一安全选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信