Causal Relationship Between Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Bidirectional 2-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chengjie Ma, Junhua Fang, Rui Xu, Langtao Ma, Guiqian Zhang, Xionggang Yang, Zhi Peng, Sheng Lu
{"title":"Causal Relationship Between Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Bidirectional 2-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study","authors":"Chengjie Ma,&nbsp;Junhua Fang,&nbsp;Rui Xu,&nbsp;Langtao Ma,&nbsp;Guiqian Zhang,&nbsp;Xionggang Yang,&nbsp;Zhi Peng,&nbsp;Sheng Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The causal relationship between mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) remains unclear. The study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between mtDNA-CN and IVDD using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The causal relationship between mtDNA-CN and IVDD was estimated using a bidirectional 2-sample MR method. The inverse-variance weighted method was employed as the main MR method. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the robustness and reliability of the MR results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The MR results by inverse-variance weighted revealed that genetically predicted mtDNA-CN was not associated with IVDD (odds ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval = 0.79–1.04; <em>P</em> = 0.1731). Similar results were observed in other 4 MR methods (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Heterogeneity was found in the analysis of IVDD on mtDNA-CN (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), while no horizontal pleiotropy was observed (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, the leave-one-out analysis indicated the robustness of MR results not biased by a single nucleotide polymorphism. Moreover, the reverse MR analysis did not reveal any significant causal association of IVDD on mtDNA-CN.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study revealed that there is no causal relationship of mtDNA-CN on the risk of IVDD, nor does IVDD have a significant causal effect on mtDNA-CN. Although the study did not find a significant causal relationship, it provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between genetic factors and IVDD. Further research is needed to explore to better understand the underlying mechanisms of this condition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"196 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025000889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The causal relationship between mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) remains unclear. The study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between mtDNA-CN and IVDD using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.

Methods

The causal relationship between mtDNA-CN and IVDD was estimated using a bidirectional 2-sample MR method. The inverse-variance weighted method was employed as the main MR method. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the robustness and reliability of the MR results.

Results

The MR results by inverse-variance weighted revealed that genetically predicted mtDNA-CN was not associated with IVDD (odds ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval = 0.79–1.04; P = 0.1731). Similar results were observed in other 4 MR methods (P > 0.05). Heterogeneity was found in the analysis of IVDD on mtDNA-CN (P < 0.05), while no horizontal pleiotropy was observed (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the leave-one-out analysis indicated the robustness of MR results not biased by a single nucleotide polymorphism. Moreover, the reverse MR analysis did not reveal any significant causal association of IVDD on mtDNA-CN.

Conclusions

The study revealed that there is no causal relationship of mtDNA-CN on the risk of IVDD, nor does IVDD have a significant causal effect on mtDNA-CN. Although the study did not find a significant causal relationship, it provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between genetic factors and IVDD. Further research is needed to explore to better understand the underlying mechanisms of this condition.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信