The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1159/000542921
Chuqi Xia, Yinuo Wang, Guowu Sun, Wanyang Lei, Daoming Liang
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chuqi Xia, Yinuo Wang, Guowu Sun, Wanyang Lei, Daoming Liang","doi":"10.1159/000542921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB), as known as a novel minimally invasive therapy for obesity, provide a sustained alternative for weight loss. Weight loss is achieved by implanting a balloon into the patient's stomach, with the volume of the balloon being adjustable through the injection or extraction of physiological saline. Its key distinction from other intragastric balloons lies in post-implantation volume control. Currently, the efficacy and safety of aIGB have not been well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Efficacy and safety of aIGB were evaluated by total body weight loss (TWL) after treatment and severe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 eligible studies with 4981 patients were included. The average inserting time was 9.9 months, and the pooled mean TWL was 16.4% (95%CI 0.153 - 0.175, I2 = 91.2%). The pooled prevalence of patients choosing upward balloon adjustment was 34.2% (95%CI 0.220 - 0.485, I2 = 96.5), and all reported additional weight loss with a mean of 6.3 (4.8~9.3) kg. The pooled prevalence of patients choosing downward balloon adjustment was 9.2% (95%CI 0.065 - 0.119, I2 = 73.9%), and the pooled prevalence of alleviating intolerance in these patients was 90.8% (95%CI 0.817-0.974, I2 = 53.4%). The pooled prevalence of intolerance and early removal within 3 months was 5.7% (95%CI 0.035 - 0.078, I2 = 79.8%), and the pooled prevalence of stomach ulcer was 1.1% (95%CI 0.008 - 0.014, I2 = 5.1%). There was no obvious publication bias detected for these outcomes. Leave-one-out and subgroup analysis demonstrated the results were statistically reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aIGB has the ability of significant and sustained weight loss, and can effectively manage both intolerance and weight loss plateaus by adjusting the balloon volume during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB), as known as a novel minimally invasive therapy for obesity, provide a sustained alternative for weight loss. Weight loss is achieved by implanting a balloon into the patient's stomach, with the volume of the balloon being adjustable through the injection or extraction of physiological saline. Its key distinction from other intragastric balloons lies in post-implantation volume control. Currently, the efficacy and safety of aIGB have not been well described.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. Efficacy and safety of aIGB were evaluated by total body weight loss (TWL) after treatment and severe adverse events.

Results: A total of 12 eligible studies with 4981 patients were included. The average inserting time was 9.9 months, and the pooled mean TWL was 16.4% (95%CI 0.153 - 0.175, I2 = 91.2%). The pooled prevalence of patients choosing upward balloon adjustment was 34.2% (95%CI 0.220 - 0.485, I2 = 96.5), and all reported additional weight loss with a mean of 6.3 (4.8~9.3) kg. The pooled prevalence of patients choosing downward balloon adjustment was 9.2% (95%CI 0.065 - 0.119, I2 = 73.9%), and the pooled prevalence of alleviating intolerance in these patients was 90.8% (95%CI 0.817-0.974, I2 = 53.4%). The pooled prevalence of intolerance and early removal within 3 months was 5.7% (95%CI 0.035 - 0.078, I2 = 79.8%), and the pooled prevalence of stomach ulcer was 1.1% (95%CI 0.008 - 0.014, I2 = 5.1%). There was no obvious publication bias detected for these outcomes. Leave-one-out and subgroup analysis demonstrated the results were statistically reliable.

Conclusion: aIGB has the ability of significant and sustained weight loss, and can effectively manage both intolerance and weight loss plateaus by adjusting the balloon volume during treatment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信