Scoping review: Intervention for ocular motor disorders in children and adults with mild traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Angela M Chen, Aaron D Salzano, Allegra P Burgher, Lynn D Greenspan, Tiong Peng Yap, Jacqueline Theis, Su-Hsun Liu, Mitchell Scheiman, Tawna L Roberts
{"title":"Scoping review: Intervention for ocular motor disorders in children and adults with mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Angela M Chen, Aaron D Salzano, Allegra P Burgher, Lynn D Greenspan, Tiong Peng Yap, Jacqueline Theis, Su-Hsun Liu, Mitchell Scheiman, Tawna L Roberts","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Intervention strategies for post-mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) ocular motor disorders vary across disciplines and include watchful waiting, vestibular rehabilitation, vision rehabilitation/vision therapy, and optical intervention. However, evidence supporting their effectiveness is limited, highlighting the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized testing, diagnostic criteria, and reassessment of ocular motor function after intervention.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Ocular motor disorders occur frequently after mTBI.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of interventions for mTBI-related ocular motor disorders in children and adults.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, PEDro, OVID, Clinical Key, Google Scholar, and REHABDATA.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Intervention studies published in English between 2003 and 2024 involving mTBI participants who had an ocular motor assessment prior to intervention were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were followed for reporting. Study population, intervention, and outcomes were extracted and synthesized in tabular and graphical formats.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven eligible studies were included, with only three (4%) judged as low risk of bias. Intervention strategies included watchful waiting (n = 31, 46%), vestibular rehabilitation (n = 13, 19%), vision rehabilitation/vision therapy (n = 10, 15%), optical intervention (n = 4, 6%), and alternative interventions or multifaceted interventions (n = 9, 14%). Among the studies providing statistically supported results, improvements in one or more ocular motor outcome domains were reported in nearly 80% of the studies on watchful waiting (19/24) and 100% of the studies on vestibular rehabilitation (4/4), vision rehabilitation/vision therapy (7/7), or optical intervention (1/1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Although post-mTBI ocular motor deficits improved with watchful waiting strategy, vestibular rehabilitation, vision rehabilitation/vision therapy, and optical interventions, most studies had significant risk of bias. This review emphasizes the necessity for high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized testing protocols and diagnostic criteria and reassessment of ocular motor functions after intervention to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in different age groups and recovery stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: Intervention strategies for post-mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) ocular motor disorders vary across disciplines and include watchful waiting, vestibular rehabilitation, vision rehabilitation/vision therapy, and optical intervention. However, evidence supporting their effectiveness is limited, highlighting the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized testing, diagnostic criteria, and reassessment of ocular motor function after intervention.

Background: Ocular motor disorders occur frequently after mTBI.

Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of interventions for mTBI-related ocular motor disorders in children and adults.

Data sources: The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, PEDro, OVID, Clinical Key, Google Scholar, and REHABDATA.

Study selection: Intervention studies published in English between 2003 and 2024 involving mTBI participants who had an ocular motor assessment prior to intervention were included in this study.

Data extraction and synthesis: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were followed for reporting. Study population, intervention, and outcomes were extracted and synthesized in tabular and graphical formats.

Results: Sixty-seven eligible studies were included, with only three (4%) judged as low risk of bias. Intervention strategies included watchful waiting (n = 31, 46%), vestibular rehabilitation (n = 13, 19%), vision rehabilitation/vision therapy (n = 10, 15%), optical intervention (n = 4, 6%), and alternative interventions or multifaceted interventions (n = 9, 14%). Among the studies providing statistically supported results, improvements in one or more ocular motor outcome domains were reported in nearly 80% of the studies on watchful waiting (19/24) and 100% of the studies on vestibular rehabilitation (4/4), vision rehabilitation/vision therapy (7/7), or optical intervention (1/1).

Conclusions and implications: Although post-mTBI ocular motor deficits improved with watchful waiting strategy, vestibular rehabilitation, vision rehabilitation/vision therapy, and optical interventions, most studies had significant risk of bias. This review emphasizes the necessity for high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized testing protocols and diagnostic criteria and reassessment of ocular motor functions after intervention to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in different age groups and recovery stages.

范围综述:儿童和成人轻度外伤性脑损伤眼运动障碍的干预措施。
意义:轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后眼运动障碍的干预策略各学科不同,包括观察等待、前庭康复、视力康复/视力治疗和光学干预。然而,支持其有效性的证据有限,强调需要高质量的随机对照试验,标准化测试,诊断标准,并在干预后重新评估眼运动功能。背景:mTBI术后经常发生眼运动障碍。目的:本研究旨在对儿童和成人mtbi相关眼运动障碍的干预措施进行范围审查。数据来源:检索了以下电子书目数据库:PubMed, Embase, PEDro, OVID, Clinical Key,谷歌Scholar和REHABDATA。研究选择:本研究纳入2003年至2024年间发表的英文干预研究,涉及在干预前进行眼运动评估的mTBI参与者。数据提取和综合:系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展遵循报告指南。研究人群、干预措施和结果以表格和图形格式提取和综合。结果:67项符合条件的研究被纳入,只有3项(4%)被判定为低偏倚风险。干预策略包括观察等待(n = 31, 46%)、前庭康复(n = 13, 19%)、视力康复/视力治疗(n = 10, 15%)、光学干预(n = 4, 6%)、替代干预或多方面干预(n = 9, 14%)。在提供统计支持结果的研究中,近80%的观察等待研究(19/24)和100%的前庭康复研究(4/4)、视力康复/视力治疗(7/7)或光学干预(1/1)报告了一个或多个眼运动结果域的改善。结论和意义:尽管观察等待策略、前庭康复、视力康复/视力治疗和光学干预可以改善mtbi后的眼运动缺陷,但大多数研究存在显著的偏倚风险。本综述强调有必要进行高质量的随机对照试验,采用标准化的测试方案和诊断标准,并在干预后重新评估眼运动功能,以评估这些干预措施在不同年龄组和恢复阶段的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信