Development of a screening tool for reduced vision among inpatients of hospital rehabilitation units.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Amritha Stalin, Shamrozé Khan, Tammy Labreche, Abhishek Narayan, Lisa W T Christian, Andre Stanberry, Susan J Leat
{"title":"Development of a screening tool for reduced vision among inpatients of hospital rehabilitation units.","authors":"Amritha Stalin, Shamrozé Khan, Tammy Labreche, Abhishek Narayan, Lisa W T Christian, Andre Stanberry, Susan J Leat","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study developed a practical screening tool to identify reduced habitual vision (RHV) in hospital rehabilitation units. This tool would enhance patient care by enabling timely interventions in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to develop a practical and implementable screening tool to identify patients with RHV in hospital rehabilitation units. Potential vision measures, screening questions, and demographic variables were considered to determine the optimum combination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study recruited 112 adult inpatients (aged 18+ years) from three rehabilitation units in an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, between October 2018 and February 2019. Data included an oral questionnaire on demographics, health status, and self-reported vision function, alongside vision assessments (distance visual acuity [VA], contrast sensitivity [CS], visual fields [VFs], and stereopsis). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of RHV, defined by VA >0.3 logMAR, CS <1.40 logCS, or any VF defect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of participants was 74.5 years (±14.3 years), and RHV was present in 48.7%. Significant predictors of RHV included self-reported \"happiness\" with vision with current spectacles and difficulty reading a newspaper. The optimal predictive factors were VA and VF testing (96% sensitivity), but for practical implementation, the combination of three self-reported questions (happiness with vision, difficulty reading a newspaper, and difficulty distinguishing facial expressions) demonstrated 74% sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights that a combination of self-reported questions can effectively identify patients with RHV, providing a feasible alternative to direct vision assessments in resource-limited settings. Implementing this screening tool could improve patient care by enabling timely adaptations and referrals for eye care, ultimately enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and reducing falls risk. Further research is needed to refine the tool's sensitivity and explore its applicability in broader hospital and primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: This study developed a practical screening tool to identify reduced habitual vision (RHV) in hospital rehabilitation units. This tool would enhance patient care by enabling timely interventions in resource-limited settings.

Purpose: The study aimed to develop a practical and implementable screening tool to identify patients with RHV in hospital rehabilitation units. Potential vision measures, screening questions, and demographic variables were considered to determine the optimum combination.

Methods: The cross-sectional study recruited 112 adult inpatients (aged 18+ years) from three rehabilitation units in an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, between October 2018 and February 2019. Data included an oral questionnaire on demographics, health status, and self-reported vision function, alongside vision assessments (distance visual acuity [VA], contrast sensitivity [CS], visual fields [VFs], and stereopsis). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of RHV, defined by VA >0.3 logMAR, CS <1.40 logCS, or any VF defect.

Results: The average age of participants was 74.5 years (±14.3 years), and RHV was present in 48.7%. Significant predictors of RHV included self-reported "happiness" with vision with current spectacles and difficulty reading a newspaper. The optimal predictive factors were VA and VF testing (96% sensitivity), but for practical implementation, the combination of three self-reported questions (happiness with vision, difficulty reading a newspaper, and difficulty distinguishing facial expressions) demonstrated 74% sensitivity.

Conclusions: The study highlights that a combination of self-reported questions can effectively identify patients with RHV, providing a feasible alternative to direct vision assessments in resource-limited settings. Implementing this screening tool could improve patient care by enabling timely adaptations and referrals for eye care, ultimately enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and reducing falls risk. Further research is needed to refine the tool's sensitivity and explore its applicability in broader hospital and primary care settings.

医院康复部住院病人视力减退筛查工具的开发。
意义:本研究开发了一种实用的筛查工具来识别医院康复单位的习惯性视力减退(RHV)。这一工具能够在资源有限的情况下及时采取干预措施,从而加强对病人的护理。目的:本研究旨在开发一种实用和可实施的筛查工具,以识别医院康复病房中的RHV患者。潜在的视力测量、筛查问题和人口统计学变量被考虑来确定最佳组合。方法:横断面研究于2018年10月至2019年2月期间从加拿大安大略省一家急症医院的三个康复部门招募了112名成年住院患者(18岁以上)。数据包括人口统计、健康状况和自述视力功能的口头调查问卷,以及视力评估(距离视力[VA]、对比敏感度[CS]、视野[VFs]和立体视觉)。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,以确定RHV的显著预测因素,由VA >0.3 logMAR, CS定义。结果:参与者的平均年龄为74.5岁(±14.3岁),RHV存在的比例为48.7%。RHV的重要预测因素包括自我报告的“幸福”,戴着当前眼镜的视力和阅读报纸的困难。最佳的预测因素是VA和VF测试(96%的灵敏度),但在实际实施中,三个自我报告的问题(视力快乐、阅读报纸的困难和区分面部表情的困难)的组合显示出74%的灵敏度。结论:该研究强调,结合自我报告的问题可以有效地识别RHV患者,在资源有限的情况下,为直接视力评估提供了可行的替代方案。实施这种筛查工具可以通过及时适应和转诊眼科护理来改善患者护理,最终提高康复效果并降低跌倒风险。需要进一步的研究来完善该工具的敏感性,并探索其在更广泛的医院和初级保健环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信