Improving stroke pathway efficiency: outcomes of a quality improvement collaborative across a national stroke network.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Roisin Walsh, Naomi Nowlan, Emma Griffin, Sinead McElroy, Colm O'Grada, Sarah Power, Alan O'Hare, Matthew Crockett, John Thornton, Patrick Nicholson
{"title":"Improving stroke pathway efficiency: outcomes of a quality improvement collaborative across a national stroke network.","authors":"Roisin Walsh, Naomi Nowlan, Emma Griffin, Sinead McElroy, Colm O'Grada, Sarah Power, Alan O'Hare, Matthew Crockett, John Thornton, Patrick Nicholson","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is crucial for improving outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study evaluated the effectiveness of a national quality improvement collaborative (QIC) in reducing process times for potential EVT candidates across a national stroke network.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post intervention design using a modified Breakthrough Series approach was implemented across 24 hospitals. Multidisciplinary teams participated in monthly learning sessions and action periods focused on reducing 'Door to Decision' (time from hospital arrival to EVT decision) to under 30 min. Mixed-effects linear models and mixed-effects ANOVA were used to analyse the impact of the QI program on Door to Decision and Door to CT times, comparing intervention and control cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QI program significantly reduced Door to Decision time in the intervention cohort by 15.9% (p<0.001) from a mean of 92.8 min to 78.9 min. Door to CT time also decreased by 15.6% (p<0.001). No significant changes were observed in the control cohort. Mixed-ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect for both Door to Decision (p<0.004) and Door to CT (p<0.04), indicating that the QI program impacted these times as compared with the control group. The QIC effectively improved the efficiency of stroke care pathways across a national stroke network. This effect was sustained across the network and over time. This success was facilitated by a bottom-up approach, fostering collaboration and shared learning within and across hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a collaborative, network-wide QI program in reducing critical process times for AIS patients. Continued efforts to sustain these improvements and optimize stroke care pathways are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is crucial for improving outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study evaluated the effectiveness of a national quality improvement collaborative (QIC) in reducing process times for potential EVT candidates across a national stroke network.

Methods: A pre-post intervention design using a modified Breakthrough Series approach was implemented across 24 hospitals. Multidisciplinary teams participated in monthly learning sessions and action periods focused on reducing 'Door to Decision' (time from hospital arrival to EVT decision) to under 30 min. Mixed-effects linear models and mixed-effects ANOVA were used to analyse the impact of the QI program on Door to Decision and Door to CT times, comparing intervention and control cohorts.

Results: The QI program significantly reduced Door to Decision time in the intervention cohort by 15.9% (p<0.001) from a mean of 92.8 min to 78.9 min. Door to CT time also decreased by 15.6% (p<0.001). No significant changes were observed in the control cohort. Mixed-ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect for both Door to Decision (p<0.004) and Door to CT (p<0.04), indicating that the QI program impacted these times as compared with the control group. The QIC effectively improved the efficiency of stroke care pathways across a national stroke network. This effect was sustained across the network and over time. This success was facilitated by a bottom-up approach, fostering collaboration and shared learning within and across hospitals.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a collaborative, network-wide QI program in reducing critical process times for AIS patients. Continued efforts to sustain these improvements and optimize stroke care pathways are warranted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信