The impact of extra-pancreatic infections on outcomes of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
XueMin Zhang, Ping Zhu, YanFei Zhang, ShanShan Dai
{"title":"The impact of extra-pancreatic infections on outcomes of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"XueMin Zhang,&nbsp;Ping Zhu,&nbsp;YanFei Zhang,&nbsp;ShanShan Dai","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The impact of extrapancreatic infections (EPI) on outcomes of acute pancreatitis has received limited attention in the literature. We compiled data from published studies to present high-quality evidence on the prognostic role of EPI on acute pancreatitis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This PRISMA-compliant and PROSPERO registered review (CRD42024516872) searched Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for comparative studies between EPI and no-EPI. Outcomes assessed were mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, necrosis, organ failure, persistent organ failure, and length of hospital stay (LOS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven studies were included in the review. The meta-analysis found that patients with EPI had a significantly higher risk of mortality as compared to the no-EPI group (OR: 3.85 95% CI: 2.79, 5.31). The risk of ICU admission (OR: 12.24 95% CI: 3.56, 42.10), necrosis (OR: 3.50 95% CI: 1.37, 8.89) organ failure (OR: 6.03 95% CI: 3.75, 9.70) and persistent organ failure (OR: 6.72 95% CI: 3.58, 12.62) was significantly increased in the EPI group compared to the non-EPI group. The meta-analysis also found significantly longer LOS in the EPI group (MD: 11.92 95% CI: 4.75, 19.08).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EPI is associated with a worse prognosis in acute pancreatitis. EPI was associated with an increased risk of mortality, ICU admission, organ failure, and prolonged LOS. Limited number of studies and baseline confounding are drawbacks of current evidence which need to be rectified by future studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":"32 5","pages":"350-359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The impact of extrapancreatic infections (EPI) on outcomes of acute pancreatitis has received limited attention in the literature. We compiled data from published studies to present high-quality evidence on the prognostic role of EPI on acute pancreatitis.

Methods

This PRISMA-compliant and PROSPERO registered review (CRD42024516872) searched Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for comparative studies between EPI and no-EPI. Outcomes assessed were mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, necrosis, organ failure, persistent organ failure, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Results

Seven studies were included in the review. The meta-analysis found that patients with EPI had a significantly higher risk of mortality as compared to the no-EPI group (OR: 3.85 95% CI: 2.79, 5.31). The risk of ICU admission (OR: 12.24 95% CI: 3.56, 42.10), necrosis (OR: 3.50 95% CI: 1.37, 8.89) organ failure (OR: 6.03 95% CI: 3.75, 9.70) and persistent organ failure (OR: 6.72 95% CI: 3.58, 12.62) was significantly increased in the EPI group compared to the non-EPI group. The meta-analysis also found significantly longer LOS in the EPI group (MD: 11.92 95% CI: 4.75, 19.08).

Conclusion

EPI is associated with a worse prognosis in acute pancreatitis. EPI was associated with an increased risk of mortality, ICU admission, organ failure, and prolonged LOS. Limited number of studies and baseline confounding are drawbacks of current evidence which need to be rectified by future studies.

胰腺外感染对急性胰腺炎预后的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:胰腺外感染(EPI)对急性胰腺炎预后的影响在文献中受到的关注有限。我们从已发表的研究中收集数据,以提供高质量的证据,证明EPI对急性胰腺炎的预后作用。方法:这篇符合prisma和PROSPERO注册的综述(CRD42024516872)在Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed中检索了EPI和无EPI的比较研究。评估的结果包括死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率、坏死、器官衰竭、持续性器官衰竭和住院时间(LOS)。结果:本综述纳入了7项研究。荟萃分析发现,与无EPI组相比,EPI患者的死亡风险明显更高(OR: 3.85 95% CI: 2.79, 5.31)。与非EPI组相比,EPI组ICU入院风险(OR: 12.24 95% CI: 3.56, 42.10),坏死(OR: 3.50 95% CI: 1.37, 8.89)器官衰竭(OR: 6.03 95% CI: 3.75, 9.70)和持续性器官衰竭(OR: 6.72 95% CI: 3.58, 12.62)显著增加。meta分析还发现EPI组的LOS明显更长(MD: 11.92 95% CI: 4.75, 19.08)。结论:EPI与急性胰腺炎预后较差有关。EPI与死亡率、ICU入院、器官衰竭和LOS延长的风险增加有关。研究数量有限和基线混淆是现有证据的缺陷,需要在未来的研究中加以纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信