Significant antibiotic use variations in testicular torsion surgery among us free-standing children's hospitals.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
John Panagides, Dylan Cahill, Jonathan J Song, Ranveer Vasdev, Rachel Saunders, Caleb P Nelson, Hsin-Hsiao Scott Wang
{"title":"Significant antibiotic use variations in testicular torsion surgery among us free-standing children's hospitals.","authors":"John Panagides, Dylan Cahill, Jonathan J Song, Ranveer Vasdev, Rachel Saunders, Caleb P Nelson, Hsin-Hsiao Scott Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is no robust evidence for the efficacy of intraoperative antibiotics in preventing infections in testicular torsion surgery, the incidence of which is reported to be <0.2 %. In the absence of clear guidelines regarding the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis, the factors influencing these differences in practice patterns remain unclear. Our study aimed to identify both patient and institution-level factors affecting whether a pediatric patient undergoing emergency testicular detorsion (orchiopexy or orchiectomy) will receive antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database to identify patients≤18 years old who underwent testicular septopexy or orchiectomy with the diagnosis of torsion of the testis between 2015 and 2021. Patient visits for repeated presentations of torsion were excluded from the analysis. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate if pre-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with hospital-level factors (treating hospital) or patient-level factors (case complexity, concurrent orchiectomy, age category, race/ethnicity, income quintile, insurance).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5313 children who underwent surgeries for testicular torsion. Median age was 13 (IQR 10-15 years). 74.0 % patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Compared to no antibiotic prophylaxis, those who received antibiotic prophylaxis were significantly older (p < 0.001). After adjusting for race/ethnicity, orchiectomy vs septopexy, income quintiles, insurance, and comorbidities, older age (12-18 years compared to the 0-12 age group, OR = 1.6 (95 % CI 1.4-1.9, p < 0.001) and hospital (p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with choice of antibiotic prophylaxis for testicular torsion surgeries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is wide variation in antibiotic prophylaxis use for patients undergoing testicular detorsion at freestanding children's hospitals in the United States. Older patients (age 12-18) are more likely to receive antibiotic prophylaxis prior to testicular torsion surgery. On the other hand, no obvious benefit in reducing subsequent hospital readmission rate was found associated with antibiotic prophylaxis. This study was limited by an inherent reliance on accurate documentation of antimicrobial-associated allergic reaction(s) and readmission rates in this PHIS database.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the risks associated with excessive antibiotic use, an understanding of the factors and proper standardization is warranted. Significant variation in antibiotic prophylaxis demonstrates the need for clearer guidelines and evidence-based practice. Future work may illustrate the potential impact on standardized protocols on reducing unwarranted antibiotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.01.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is no robust evidence for the efficacy of intraoperative antibiotics in preventing infections in testicular torsion surgery, the incidence of which is reported to be <0.2 %. In the absence of clear guidelines regarding the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis, the factors influencing these differences in practice patterns remain unclear. Our study aimed to identify both patient and institution-level factors affecting whether a pediatric patient undergoing emergency testicular detorsion (orchiopexy or orchiectomy) will receive antibiotic prophylaxis.

Materials and methods: We utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database to identify patients≤18 years old who underwent testicular septopexy or orchiectomy with the diagnosis of torsion of the testis between 2015 and 2021. Patient visits for repeated presentations of torsion were excluded from the analysis. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate if pre-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with hospital-level factors (treating hospital) or patient-level factors (case complexity, concurrent orchiectomy, age category, race/ethnicity, income quintile, insurance).

Results: We included 5313 children who underwent surgeries for testicular torsion. Median age was 13 (IQR 10-15 years). 74.0 % patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Compared to no antibiotic prophylaxis, those who received antibiotic prophylaxis were significantly older (p < 0.001). After adjusting for race/ethnicity, orchiectomy vs septopexy, income quintiles, insurance, and comorbidities, older age (12-18 years compared to the 0-12 age group, OR = 1.6 (95 % CI 1.4-1.9, p < 0.001) and hospital (p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with choice of antibiotic prophylaxis for testicular torsion surgeries.

Discussion: There is wide variation in antibiotic prophylaxis use for patients undergoing testicular detorsion at freestanding children's hospitals in the United States. Older patients (age 12-18) are more likely to receive antibiotic prophylaxis prior to testicular torsion surgery. On the other hand, no obvious benefit in reducing subsequent hospital readmission rate was found associated with antibiotic prophylaxis. This study was limited by an inherent reliance on accurate documentation of antimicrobial-associated allergic reaction(s) and readmission rates in this PHIS database.

Conclusions: Given the risks associated with excessive antibiotic use, an understanding of the factors and proper standardization is warranted. Significant variation in antibiotic prophylaxis demonstrates the need for clearer guidelines and evidence-based practice. Future work may illustrate the potential impact on standardized protocols on reducing unwarranted antibiotic use.

独立儿童医院睾丸扭转手术中显著的抗生素使用差异
目的:术中抗生素预防睾丸扭转手术感染的有效性尚无有力证据,其发生率据报道为:材料和方法:我们利用儿童健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库,对2015年至2021年间诊断为睾丸扭转的≤18岁接受睾丸中隔切除术或睾丸切除术的患者进行识别。反复出现扭转的患者就诊被排除在分析之外。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估手术前抗生素预防是否与医院水平因素(治疗医院)或患者水平因素(病例复杂性、并发睾丸切除术、年龄类别、种族/民族、收入五分位数、保险)相关。结果:我们纳入了5313名接受睾丸扭转手术的儿童。中位年龄为13岁(IQR 10-15岁)。74.0%的患者接受了抗生素预防。与未使用抗生素预防治疗的患者相比,接受抗生素预防治疗的患者明显年龄更大(p)。讨论:美国独立儿童医院对睾丸扭曲患者使用抗生素预防治疗的情况差异很大。年龄较大的患者(12-18岁)更有可能在睾丸扭转手术前接受抗生素预防。另一方面,抗生素预防在降低随后的住院再入院率方面没有发现明显的好处。这项研究的局限性在于,它固有地依赖于公共卫生信息系统数据库中与抗菌素相关的过敏反应和再入院率的准确记录。结论:考虑到与过度使用抗生素相关的风险,有必要了解这些因素并进行适当的标准化。抗生素预防的显著差异表明需要更明确的指南和循证实践。未来的工作可能会说明减少不必要的抗生素使用的标准化方案的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信