The diagnostic value and efficacy evaluation of lung ultrasound score in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1500500
Jian Dong, Yuhong Deng, Jin Tong, Tingting Du, Wenguang Liu, Yan Guo
{"title":"The diagnostic value and efficacy evaluation of lung ultrasound score in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Jian Dong, Yuhong Deng, Jin Tong, Tingting Du, Wenguang Liu, Yan Guo","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1500500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and determine the optimal cut-off values of lung ultrasound score for diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and its accuracy in assessing the efficacy of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective study included 100 neonates with suspected neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Each patient underwent both the 14-zone and 12-zone lung ultrasound methods, as well as a chest x-ray, performed after birth and before initiating drug treatment. Surfactant replacement therapy was administered to patients who were diagnosed with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and met the criteria for medication. Lung ultrasound was conducted and recorded at the 24th hour, the 48th hour, the 72nd hour, and the 7th day after drug administration. ROC curve analysis, Kappa statistics, and ANOVA were utilized to identify the optimal cut-off values for the lung ultrasound scores in diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89 neonates were diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome, of whom 64 received surfactant replacement therapy. The mean scores of 12-zone lung ultrasound score, 14-zone lung ultrasound score, and chest x-ray score are 18.22 ± 7.15, 38.92 ± 9.69, and 2.15 ± 0.97, respectively. The diagnostic AUC for the 12-zone lung ultrasound score is 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), with an optimal cut-off value of 13.5 for diseased vs. not diseased, while the AUC for the 14-zone lung ultrasound score is 0.88 (95% CI: 0.76-0.99), with an optimal cut-off value of 34 for diseased vs. not diseased. There is significant concordance between the neonatal lung ultrasonography scores and the chest x-ray score for diagnosis respiratory distress syndrome (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The optimal cut-off values for the grading diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome using the 14-zone lung ultrasound score are identified as 36.5, 40.5, and 44.5. The 12-zone lung ultrasound score does not have a significant difference between the 12th hour after receiving surfactant replacement therapy and the 48th hour after treatment (<i>P</i> = 0.08). All other comparisons demonstrated significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 14-zone lung ultrasound score demonstrates higher diagnostic efficacy in diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and can accurately evaluate the early efficacy of surfactant replacement therapy in neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1500500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1500500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and determine the optimal cut-off values of lung ultrasound score for diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and its accuracy in assessing the efficacy of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Method: This prospective study included 100 neonates with suspected neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Each patient underwent both the 14-zone and 12-zone lung ultrasound methods, as well as a chest x-ray, performed after birth and before initiating drug treatment. Surfactant replacement therapy was administered to patients who were diagnosed with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and met the criteria for medication. Lung ultrasound was conducted and recorded at the 24th hour, the 48th hour, the 72nd hour, and the 7th day after drug administration. ROC curve analysis, Kappa statistics, and ANOVA were utilized to identify the optimal cut-off values for the lung ultrasound scores in diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Results: 89 neonates were diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome, of whom 64 received surfactant replacement therapy. The mean scores of 12-zone lung ultrasound score, 14-zone lung ultrasound score, and chest x-ray score are 18.22 ± 7.15, 38.92 ± 9.69, and 2.15 ± 0.97, respectively. The diagnostic AUC for the 12-zone lung ultrasound score is 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), with an optimal cut-off value of 13.5 for diseased vs. not diseased, while the AUC for the 14-zone lung ultrasound score is 0.88 (95% CI: 0.76-0.99), with an optimal cut-off value of 34 for diseased vs. not diseased. There is significant concordance between the neonatal lung ultrasonography scores and the chest x-ray score for diagnosis respiratory distress syndrome (P < 0.01). The optimal cut-off values for the grading diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome using the 14-zone lung ultrasound score are identified as 36.5, 40.5, and 44.5. The 12-zone lung ultrasound score does not have a significant difference between the 12th hour after receiving surfactant replacement therapy and the 48th hour after treatment (P = 0.08). All other comparisons demonstrated significant differences.

Conclusion: The 14-zone lung ultrasound score demonstrates higher diagnostic efficacy in diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and can accurately evaluate the early efficacy of surfactant replacement therapy in neonates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信