Clinical study on the relationship between the incidence of complications and tumour size after thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Hyperthermia Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/02656736.2025.2464205
Han-Xiao Zhao, Ying Wei, Zhen-Long Zhao, Li-Li Peng, Yan Li, Jie Wu, Shi-Liang Cao, Na Yu, Ming-An Yu
{"title":"Clinical study on the relationship between the incidence of complications and tumour size after thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules.","authors":"Han-Xiao Zhao, Ying Wei, Zhen-Long Zhao, Li-Li Peng, Yan Li, Jie Wu, Shi-Liang Cao, Na Yu, Ming-An Yu","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2025.2464205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between the incidence of complications and tumor size following thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules (BTNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 1198 patients who underwent thermal ablation for unifocal BTN were enrolled. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was performed to select the cutoff values of the maximum diameter (MD) for dividing patients into different groups or subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall complication rate was 3.8% (45/1198). Major complications included hoarseness (2.4%), nodule rupture (0.3%) and delayed hemorrhage (0.1%), whereas minor complications were limited to intraoperative hemorrhage (0.9%). The difference in the overall complication rate between the smaller group (< 3.15 cm) and the larger group (> 3.15 cm) was significant (1.0% vs. 6.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, a significant difference was observed between the 3.15-4.15 cm and > 4.15 cm subgroups (4.2% vs. 8.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.023); however, no significant difference was identified between the < 2.35 and 2.35-3.15 cm subgroups (0.6% vs. 1.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.390). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that MD and the nodule component were associated with complications. After PSM, no significant difference in complication rates was observed between MWA and RFA in either the smaller group (<i>p</i> = 1.000) or the larger group (<i>p</i> = 0.186).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of complications in thermal ablation is greater for larger thyroid nodules, particularly for predominantly solid nodules with MDs greater than 3.15 cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","volume":"42 1","pages":"2464205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2464205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between the incidence of complications and tumor size following thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules (BTNs).

Methods: In this retrospective study, 1198 patients who underwent thermal ablation for unifocal BTN were enrolled. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was performed to select the cutoff values of the maximum diameter (MD) for dividing patients into different groups or subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for confounding variables.

Results: The overall complication rate was 3.8% (45/1198). Major complications included hoarseness (2.4%), nodule rupture (0.3%) and delayed hemorrhage (0.1%), whereas minor complications were limited to intraoperative hemorrhage (0.9%). The difference in the overall complication rate between the smaller group (< 3.15 cm) and the larger group (> 3.15 cm) was significant (1.0% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, a significant difference was observed between the 3.15-4.15 cm and > 4.15 cm subgroups (4.2% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.023); however, no significant difference was identified between the < 2.35 and 2.35-3.15 cm subgroups (0.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.390). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that MD and the nodule component were associated with complications. After PSM, no significant difference in complication rates was observed between MWA and RFA in either the smaller group (p = 1.000) or the larger group (p = 0.186).

Conclusions: The incidence of complications in thermal ablation is greater for larger thyroid nodules, particularly for predominantly solid nodules with MDs greater than 3.15 cm.

甲状腺良性结节热消融术后并发症发生率与肿瘤大小关系的临床研究。
目的:分析甲状腺良性结节热消融术后并发症发生率与肿瘤大小的关系。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了1198例接受单灶性BTN热消融治疗的患者。进行受试者操作特征分析,选择最大直径(MD)的截止值,将患者分为不同的组或亚组。采用多变量logistic回归分析确定危险因素。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)控制混杂变量。结果:总并发症发生率为3.8%(45/1198)。主要并发症包括声音嘶哑(2.4%)、结节破裂(0.3%)和延迟性出血(0.1%),而次要并发症仅限于术中出血(0.9%)。小组(< 3.15 cm)与大组(> 3.15 cm)的总并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(1.0% vs 6.5%, p 4.15 cm亚组(4.2% vs 8.7%, p = 0.023);然而,< 2.35 cm和2.35-3.15 cm亚组之间无显著差异(0.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.390)。多变量logistic回归显示MD和结节成分与并发症相关。PSM后,无论是小剂量组(p = 1.000)还是大剂量组(p = 0.186), MWA和RFA的并发症发生率均无显著差异。结论:对于较大的甲状腺结节,尤其是MDs大于3.15 cm的实性结节,热消融的并发症发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hyperthermia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信