Integration of Complementary Medicine in Geriatric Nursing Homes: A Prospective Comparative Observational Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Complementary Medicine Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1159/000544712
Miriam Ortiz, Katharina Schnabel, Sylvia Binting, Susanne Lezius, Karl Wegscheider, Michael Teut, Ralf Suhr, Benno Brinkhaus
{"title":"Integration of Complementary Medicine in Geriatric Nursing Homes: A Prospective Comparative Observational Study.","authors":"Miriam Ortiz, Katharina Schnabel, Sylvia Binting, Susanne Lezius, Karl Wegscheider, Michael Teut, Ralf Suhr, Benno Brinkhaus","doi":"10.1159/000544712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A healthy lifestyle is considered to be an important factor for healthy aging. Kneipp therapy (KT) includes a combination of hydrotherapy, herbal medicine, mind-body medicine, physical activities, and healthy nutrition. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of KT care on activities of daily living, health, and quality of life in residents of nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, two-armed comparative observational study to compare matched nursing homes with KT (Kneipp group) versus nursing homes with common preventive interventions (control group) over a 12-month period. Outcome measures included activities of daily living (Barthel Index), cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), and quality of life (QUALIDEM; Short-Form 12 [SF-12]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 7 nursing homes (n = 105 residents) for the Kneipp group and 6 nursing homes (n = 69) as control. Except for Barthel Index, there were no time point-dependent differences between the groups. The Barthel Index showed a smaller difference from baseline in the control group (mean difference 0.94, 95% CI [-1.94; 3.82]) compared to the Kneipp group (-4.08, 95% CI [-6.46; -1.69]; p = 0.009) after 6 months; mean difference between groups Kneipp versus control: 5.01, 95% CI [1.25; 8.77]; p = 0.009. Pooled over the time points, the SF-12 mental health sum scale exhibited a smaller difference from baseline in the Kneipp group (-1.3, 95% CI [-3.6; 0.9]) compared to the control group (-3.8, 95% CI [-6.3; -1.4]; p = 0.027). Furthermore, the MMSE sum score decreased less in the Kneipp group compared to control (-1.1, 95% CI [-2.2, -0.1]; p = 0.033) after 12 months. A post hoc comparison of residents from both groups who received at least 30 preventive interventions monthly exhibited better values for QUALIDEM items \"social relations,\" \"social isolation,\" and \"feeling at home.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comparative observational study showed only small differences in outcome measures between the groups. The frequency of treatments may positively influence social components of behavior and well-being in residents. High-quality pragmatic randomized trials are needed for further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":"122-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A healthy lifestyle is considered to be an important factor for healthy aging. Kneipp therapy (KT) includes a combination of hydrotherapy, herbal medicine, mind-body medicine, physical activities, and healthy nutrition. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of KT care on activities of daily living, health, and quality of life in residents of nursing homes.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, two-armed comparative observational study to compare matched nursing homes with KT (Kneipp group) versus nursing homes with common preventive interventions (control group) over a 12-month period. Outcome measures included activities of daily living (Barthel Index), cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), and quality of life (QUALIDEM; Short-Form 12 [SF-12]).

Results: We included 7 nursing homes (n = 105 residents) for the Kneipp group and 6 nursing homes (n = 69) as control. Except for Barthel Index, there were no time point-dependent differences between the groups. The Barthel Index showed a smaller difference from baseline in the control group (mean difference 0.94, 95% CI [-1.94; 3.82]) compared to the Kneipp group (-4.08, 95% CI [-6.46; -1.69]; p = 0.009) after 6 months; mean difference between groups Kneipp versus control: 5.01, 95% CI [1.25; 8.77]; p = 0.009. Pooled over the time points, the SF-12 mental health sum scale exhibited a smaller difference from baseline in the Kneipp group (-1.3, 95% CI [-3.6; 0.9]) compared to the control group (-3.8, 95% CI [-6.3; -1.4]; p = 0.027). Furthermore, the MMSE sum score decreased less in the Kneipp group compared to control (-1.1, 95% CI [-2.2, -0.1]; p = 0.033) after 12 months. A post hoc comparison of residents from both groups who received at least 30 preventive interventions monthly exhibited better values for QUALIDEM items "social relations," "social isolation," and "feeling at home."

Conclusion: This comparative observational study showed only small differences in outcome measures between the groups. The frequency of treatments may positively influence social components of behavior and well-being in residents. High-quality pragmatic randomized trials are needed for further investigations.

老年疗养院的补充医学整合:一项前瞻性比较观察研究。
健康的生活方式被认为是健康老龄化的重要因素。克尼普疗法(KT)包括水疗、草药、身心医学、体育活动和健康营养的结合。本研究旨在探讨KT照护对安老院住客日常生活活动、健康及生活品质的影响。方法我们进行了一项前瞻性、双臂比较观察研究,比较了在12个月的时间里,与KT相匹配的养老院(Kneipp组)和与普通预防干预相匹配的养老院(对照组)。结果测量包括日常生活活动(Barthel指数)、认知(迷你精神状态检查(MMSE))和生活质量(QUALIDEM;简表12 (SF-12))。结果Kneipp组共纳入7家疗养院(n=105),对照组共纳入6家疗养院(n=69)。除Barthel指数外,各组间无时间点相关差异。对照组Barthel指数与基线差异较小(平均差值0.94,95%CI [-1.94;3.82]),与Kneipp组相比(- 4.08,95%CI [-6.46;-1.69);P =0.009)。在Kneipp组中,SF-12心理健康总量表与基线的差异较小(-1.3,95%CI [-3.6;0.9])与对照组相比(-3.8,95%CI [-6.3;-1.4);p = 0.027)。此外,与对照组相比,Kneipp组的MMSE评分下降较少(-1.1,95%CI [-2.2, -0.1];P =0.033)。对每月至少接受30次预防性干预的两组居民进行的事后比较显示,他们在QUALIDEM项目“社会关系”、“社会孤立”和“宾至如归”方面的价值更高。结论:这项比较观察性研究显示,两组之间的结果指标只有很小的差异。治疗频率可能对居民行为和幸福感的社会成分产生积极影响。进一步的研究需要高质量的实用随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信