Outcomes after radical endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1055/a-2538-9316
Man Wai Chan, Rehan Haidry, Benjamin Norton, Massimiliano di Pietro, Andreas V Hadjinicolaou, Maximilien Barret, Paul Doumbe Mandengue, Stefan Seewald, Raf Bisschops, Philippe Nafteux, Michael J Bourke, Sunil Gupta, Pradeep Mundre, Arnaud Lemmers, Clémence Vuckovic, Oliver Pech, Philippe Leclercq, Emmanuel Coron, Sybren L Meijer, Jacques Bergman, Roos E Pouw
{"title":"Outcomes after radical endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Man Wai Chan, Rehan Haidry, Benjamin Norton, Massimiliano di Pietro, Andreas V Hadjinicolaou, Maximilien Barret, Paul Doumbe Mandengue, Stefan Seewald, Raf Bisschops, Philippe Nafteux, Michael J Bourke, Sunil Gupta, Pradeep Mundre, Arnaud Lemmers, Clémence Vuckovic, Oliver Pech, Philippe Leclercq, Emmanuel Coron, Sybren L Meijer, Jacques Bergman, Roos E Pouw","doi":"10.1055/a-2538-9316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Post-endoscopic resection (ER) management of high-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is debated, with conflicting reports on lymph node metastases (LNM) We aimed to assess outcomes following radical ER for high-risk T1 EAC. Methods We identified patients who underwent radical ER (tumor-negative deep margin) of high-risk T1 EAC, followed by surgery or endoscopic surveillance, between 2008-2019 across 11 international centers. Results In total, 106 patients (86 men, 70 ±11 years) were included. Of these, 26 patients (64 ±11 yrs) underwent additional surgery, with residual T1 EAC in 5 (19%) and LNM in 2 (8%) cases. After median 47 (IQR 32-79) months follow-up, 2/26 (8%) developed LNM/distant metastasis (DM), with 1 (4%) EAC-related death. There was 1/26 (4%) unrelated death and 4/26 (15%) were lost to follow-up. Eighty patients (71 ±9 yrs) entered endoscopic surveillance. Over 46 (IQR 25-59) months follow-up, 5/80 (6%) developed LNM/DM, with 4/80 (5%) EAC-related deaths. There were 15/80 (19%) unrelated deaths, and 10/80 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Overall rates during follow-up were 6% (95% CI 2-12) for LNM, 7% (95% CI 3-13) for LNM/DM, 5% (95% CI 2-11) for EAC-related mortality, and 20% (95% CI 13-29) for overall mortality. Conclusion Our findings present low rates of LNM after radical ER of high-risk T1 EAC, consistent with other endoscopy-focused studies. Post-surgical patients are still at risk for metastasis and disease-specific mortality. These results suggest that endoscopic surveillance is suitable for selected cases, but further prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and confirm optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2538-9316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Post-endoscopic resection (ER) management of high-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is debated, with conflicting reports on lymph node metastases (LNM) We aimed to assess outcomes following radical ER for high-risk T1 EAC. Methods We identified patients who underwent radical ER (tumor-negative deep margin) of high-risk T1 EAC, followed by surgery or endoscopic surveillance, between 2008-2019 across 11 international centers. Results In total, 106 patients (86 men, 70 ±11 years) were included. Of these, 26 patients (64 ±11 yrs) underwent additional surgery, with residual T1 EAC in 5 (19%) and LNM in 2 (8%) cases. After median 47 (IQR 32-79) months follow-up, 2/26 (8%) developed LNM/distant metastasis (DM), with 1 (4%) EAC-related death. There was 1/26 (4%) unrelated death and 4/26 (15%) were lost to follow-up. Eighty patients (71 ±9 yrs) entered endoscopic surveillance. Over 46 (IQR 25-59) months follow-up, 5/80 (6%) developed LNM/DM, with 4/80 (5%) EAC-related deaths. There were 15/80 (19%) unrelated deaths, and 10/80 (13%) were lost to follow-up. Overall rates during follow-up were 6% (95% CI 2-12) for LNM, 7% (95% CI 3-13) for LNM/DM, 5% (95% CI 2-11) for EAC-related mortality, and 20% (95% CI 13-29) for overall mortality. Conclusion Our findings present low rates of LNM after radical ER of high-risk T1 EAC, consistent with other endoscopy-focused studies. Post-surgical patients are still at risk for metastasis and disease-specific mortality. These results suggest that endoscopic surveillance is suitable for selected cases, but further prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and confirm optimal outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy
Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1401
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信