Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability in parcel delivery workers based on machine learning techniques.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ui-Jae Hwang, Oh-Yun Kwon, Jun-Hee Kim, Gyeong-Tae Gwak
{"title":"Factors contributing to chronic ankle instability in parcel delivery workers based on machine learning techniques.","authors":"Ui-Jae Hwang, Oh-Yun Kwon, Jun-Hee Kim, Gyeong-Tae Gwak","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02919-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle injuries in parcel delivery workers (PDWs) are most often caused by trips. Ankle sprains have high recurrence rates and are associated with chronic ankle instability (CAI). This study aimed to develop, determine, and compare the predictive performance of statistical machine learning models to classify PDWs with and without CAI using postural control, ankle range of motion, ankle joint muscle strength, and anatomical deformity variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>244 PDWs who had worked in parcel delivery for more than 6 months were screened for eligibility. Thirteen predictors were included in the study: 12 numeric (age, body mass index, work duration, the number of balance retrials eyes-closed single-limb stance, Y-balance test, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, lunge angle, strength ratio of the evertor in plantar flexion and neutral position to the invertor, ankle dorsiflexor strength, navicular drop, and resting calcaneal stance position) and one categorical (success of the eyes-closed single-limb stance). Five machine learning algorithms, including LASSO logistic regression, Extreme Gradient boosting machine, support vector machine, Naïve Bayes machine, and random forest-were trained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The support vector machine and random forest models confirmed good predictive performance in the training and test datasets, respectively, for PDWs. For the Shapley Additive Explanations, among the five machine learning models, the variables entered into three or more models were low ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, low lunge angle, high body mass index, old age, a high number of balance retrials of the eyes-closed single-limb stance, and low strength ratio of the evertor in the neutral position to the invertor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our approach produced machine learning models to classify PDWs with and without CAI and confirmed good predictive performance in PDWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02919-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ankle injuries in parcel delivery workers (PDWs) are most often caused by trips. Ankle sprains have high recurrence rates and are associated with chronic ankle instability (CAI). This study aimed to develop, determine, and compare the predictive performance of statistical machine learning models to classify PDWs with and without CAI using postural control, ankle range of motion, ankle joint muscle strength, and anatomical deformity variables.

Methods: 244 PDWs who had worked in parcel delivery for more than 6 months were screened for eligibility. Thirteen predictors were included in the study: 12 numeric (age, body mass index, work duration, the number of balance retrials eyes-closed single-limb stance, Y-balance test, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, lunge angle, strength ratio of the evertor in plantar flexion and neutral position to the invertor, ankle dorsiflexor strength, navicular drop, and resting calcaneal stance position) and one categorical (success of the eyes-closed single-limb stance). Five machine learning algorithms, including LASSO logistic regression, Extreme Gradient boosting machine, support vector machine, Naïve Bayes machine, and random forest-were trained.

Results: The support vector machine and random forest models confirmed good predictive performance in the training and test datasets, respectively, for PDWs. For the Shapley Additive Explanations, among the five machine learning models, the variables entered into three or more models were low ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, low lunge angle, high body mass index, old age, a high number of balance retrials of the eyes-closed single-limb stance, and low strength ratio of the evertor in the neutral position to the invertor.

Conclusion: Our approach produced machine learning models to classify PDWs with and without CAI and confirmed good predictive performance in PDWs.

背景:包裹投递员(PDWs)的踝关节损伤最常见的原因是绊倒。踝关节扭伤的复发率很高,并且与慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)有关。本研究旨在利用姿势控制、踝关节活动范围、踝关节肌肉力量和解剖畸形变量,开发、确定和比较统计机器学习模型的预测性能,以对患有和不患有 CAI 的 PDWs 进行分类。研究纳入了 13 项预测因素:12个数字变量(年龄、体重指数、工作持续时间、闭眼单肢站立平衡复试次数、Y-平衡测试、踝关节背屈运动范围、弓步角度、跖屈和中立位时外展肌与内翻肌的力量比、踝关节背屈肌力量、舟骨下垂和静止小腿站立位置)和1个分类变量(闭眼单肢站立成功率)。训练了五种机器学习算法,包括 LASSO 逻辑回归、极梯度提升机、支持向量机、奈夫贝叶斯机和随机森林:支持向量机和随机森林模型分别在训练数据集和测试数据集上证实了对 PDW 的良好预测性能。就夏普利加法解释而言,在五个机器学习模型中,进入三个或三个以上模型的变量分别是:踝关节背屈运动范围小、弓步角度小、体重指数高、年龄大、闭眼单肢站立的平衡重试次数多、中立位反转器与反转器的力量比低:我们的方法建立了机器学习模型,用于对有CAI和无CAI的PDW进行分类,并证实了对PDW具有良好的预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信