Clinical characteristics and treatment response of a possible self-contamination subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a prospective investigation.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Keiichiro Mukai, Kyosuke Yamanishi, Yukihiko Hosoi, Masahiko Sakurai, Shun Ogino, Kensei Maebayashi, Kazuhisa Hayashida, Hisato Matsunaga
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and treatment response of a possible self-contamination subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a prospective investigation.","authors":"Keiichiro Mukai, Kyosuke Yamanishi, Yukihiko Hosoi, Masahiko Sakurai, Shun Ogino, Kensei Maebayashi, Kazuhisa Hayashida, Hisato Matsunaga","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06582-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) present invasive thoughts and repetitive behaviors affecting 1-3% of the population, divided into 3-5 symptom dimensions. Self-contamination, a subtype within the contamination/washing dimension, remains poorly understood. This study aim is to investigate pathological features and treatment response in self-contamination subtype compared to other contamination subtype and checking symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-one OCD patients were categorized into self-contamination (n = 15), contaminated (n = 25), and checking symptom (control, n = 31) groups. OCD symptom severity was assessed using the Japanese version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) Symptom Checklist. Comorbidities were evaluated using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Global functioning, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were measured using DSM-IV's Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAFS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale, respectively. Treatment involved a standardized combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and cognitive-behavioral therapy, with treatment response assessed after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects in the self-contamination group showed significantly lower quality of life, GAFS scores, and higher comorbidities including major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, and olfactory reference disorder. Treatment response was notably poorer in the self-contamination group. Multiple regression analysis identified four poor treatment outcome predictors: score on the Y-BOCS and the SDS, duration of illness, and prevalence of ORD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identification of the self-contamination subtype in OCD patients is crucial for understanding the pathophysiological and treatment response. Further research is needed to clarify the socio-cultural effects on the development of this putative subtype of OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06582-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) present invasive thoughts and repetitive behaviors affecting 1-3% of the population, divided into 3-5 symptom dimensions. Self-contamination, a subtype within the contamination/washing dimension, remains poorly understood. This study aim is to investigate pathological features and treatment response in self-contamination subtype compared to other contamination subtype and checking symptoms.

Method: Seventy-one OCD patients were categorized into self-contamination (n = 15), contaminated (n = 25), and checking symptom (control, n = 31) groups. OCD symptom severity was assessed using the Japanese version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) Symptom Checklist. Comorbidities were evaluated using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Global functioning, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were measured using DSM-IV's Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAFS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale, respectively. Treatment involved a standardized combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and cognitive-behavioral therapy, with treatment response assessed after 1 year.

Results: Subjects in the self-contamination group showed significantly lower quality of life, GAFS scores, and higher comorbidities including major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, and olfactory reference disorder. Treatment response was notably poorer in the self-contamination group. Multiple regression analysis identified four poor treatment outcome predictors: score on the Y-BOCS and the SDS, duration of illness, and prevalence of ORD.

Conclusion: The identification of the self-contamination subtype in OCD patients is crucial for understanding the pathophysiological and treatment response. Further research is needed to clarify the socio-cultural effects on the development of this putative subtype of OCD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信