Kathrin Schorr, Sebastian Beck, Oliver Zimmer, Felix Baumann, Max Keller, Ralph Witzgall, Achim Goepferich
{"title":"The quantity of ligand-receptor interactions between nanoparticles and target cells.","authors":"Kathrin Schorr, Sebastian Beck, Oliver Zimmer, Felix Baumann, Max Keller, Ralph Witzgall, Achim Goepferich","doi":"10.1039/d4nh00645c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achieving high target cell avidity in combination with cell selectivity are fundamental, but largely unachieved goals in the development of biomedical nanoparticle systems, which are intricately linked to the quantity of targeting functionalities on their surface. Viruses, regarded as almost ideal role models for nanoparticle design, are evolutionary optimized, so that they cope with this challenge bearing an extremely low number of spikes, and thus binding domains, on their surface. In comparison, nanoparticles are usually equipped with more than an order of magnitude more ligands. It is therefore obvious that one key factor for increasing nanoparticle efficiency in terms of avidity and selectivity lies in optimizing their ligand number. A first step along this way is to know how many ligands per nanoparticle are involved in specific binding with target cell receptors. This question is addressed experimentally for a block copolymer nanoparticle model system. The data confirm that only a fraction of the nanoparticle ligands is involved in the binding processes: with a total ligand valency of 29 ligands/100 nm<sup>2</sup> surface area a maximum 5.3 ligands/100 nm<sup>2</sup> are involved in specific receptor binding. This corresponds to an average number of 251 binding ligands per nanoparticle, a number that can be rationalized within the biological context of the model system.</p>","PeriodicalId":93,"journal":{"name":"Nanoscale Horizons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoscale Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nh00645c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Achieving high target cell avidity in combination with cell selectivity are fundamental, but largely unachieved goals in the development of biomedical nanoparticle systems, which are intricately linked to the quantity of targeting functionalities on their surface. Viruses, regarded as almost ideal role models for nanoparticle design, are evolutionary optimized, so that they cope with this challenge bearing an extremely low number of spikes, and thus binding domains, on their surface. In comparison, nanoparticles are usually equipped with more than an order of magnitude more ligands. It is therefore obvious that one key factor for increasing nanoparticle efficiency in terms of avidity and selectivity lies in optimizing their ligand number. A first step along this way is to know how many ligands per nanoparticle are involved in specific binding with target cell receptors. This question is addressed experimentally for a block copolymer nanoparticle model system. The data confirm that only a fraction of the nanoparticle ligands is involved in the binding processes: with a total ligand valency of 29 ligands/100 nm2 surface area a maximum 5.3 ligands/100 nm2 are involved in specific receptor binding. This corresponds to an average number of 251 binding ligands per nanoparticle, a number that can be rationalized within the biological context of the model system.
期刊介绍:
Nanoscale Horizons stands out as a premier journal for publishing exceptionally high-quality and innovative nanoscience and nanotechnology. The emphasis lies on original research that introduces a new concept or a novel perspective (a conceptual advance), prioritizing this over reporting technological improvements. Nevertheless, outstanding articles showcasing truly groundbreaking developments, including record-breaking performance, may also find a place in the journal. Published work must be of substantial general interest to our broad and diverse readership across the nanoscience and nanotechnology community.