Unravelling risk factors for delayed bleeding following ultrasonography-guided liver biopsy: a retrospective analysis.

IF 3.8 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-24-79
Tao Jiang, Qunying Li, Ju Li, Tianan Jiang
{"title":"Unravelling risk factors for delayed bleeding following ultrasonography-guided liver biopsy: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Tao Jiang, Qunying Li, Ju Li, Tianan Jiang","doi":"10.21037/tgh-24-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous liver puncture remains the gold standard for diagnosis of liver lesions, though image-guided techniques reduce the incidence of complications, there remains a risk of severe delayed bleeding. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with delayed bleeding complications after ultrasonography-guided liver biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we enrolled a total of 642 patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous liver biopsy at our institution between January 2022 and December 2023. Data on patient characteristics, laboratory results, radiographic findings, bleeding complications, and treatments were extracted from the electronic medical records (EMR) system of the hospital. This study aimed to identify the differences in clinical characteristics between post-biopsy bleeding and non-bleeding groups as well as between early and delayed post-biopsy bleeding groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) algorithms were employed to mitigate the impact of sample size on the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusion screening, a total of 627 patients were included in this study. Of these, 233 (37.16%) were men and 394 (62.84%) were women. The primary reason for liver puncture was liver transplantation (45.29%). Eleven cases of post-biopsy bleeding were observed, where eight were mild (72.73% of total cases exhibiting bleeding and 1.27% of total punctures) and three were serious (27.27% of total cases displaying bleeding and 0.48% of total punctures). Serious bleeding was delayed in all patients exhibiting bleeding. No bleeding-related risk factors were identified in either the overall cohort or the PSM cohort. Nevertheless, our findings indicate that patients with delayed bleeding exhibited lower platelet counts and were more likely to present with hydrothorax or ascites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in any of the baseline characteristics between patients with and without post-biopsy bleeding. However, when patients presented with platelets below the normal range in conjunction with hydrothorax or ascites, there was an increased risk of delayed bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94362,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":"10 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-24-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous liver puncture remains the gold standard for diagnosis of liver lesions, though image-guided techniques reduce the incidence of complications, there remains a risk of severe delayed bleeding. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with delayed bleeding complications after ultrasonography-guided liver biopsy.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled a total of 642 patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous liver biopsy at our institution between January 2022 and December 2023. Data on patient characteristics, laboratory results, radiographic findings, bleeding complications, and treatments were extracted from the electronic medical records (EMR) system of the hospital. This study aimed to identify the differences in clinical characteristics between post-biopsy bleeding and non-bleeding groups as well as between early and delayed post-biopsy bleeding groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) algorithms were employed to mitigate the impact of sample size on the results.

Results: After exclusion screening, a total of 627 patients were included in this study. Of these, 233 (37.16%) were men and 394 (62.84%) were women. The primary reason for liver puncture was liver transplantation (45.29%). Eleven cases of post-biopsy bleeding were observed, where eight were mild (72.73% of total cases exhibiting bleeding and 1.27% of total punctures) and three were serious (27.27% of total cases displaying bleeding and 0.48% of total punctures). Serious bleeding was delayed in all patients exhibiting bleeding. No bleeding-related risk factors were identified in either the overall cohort or the PSM cohort. Nevertheless, our findings indicate that patients with delayed bleeding exhibited lower platelet counts and were more likely to present with hydrothorax or ascites.

Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in any of the baseline characteristics between patients with and without post-biopsy bleeding. However, when patients presented with platelets below the normal range in conjunction with hydrothorax or ascites, there was an increased risk of delayed bleeding.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信