Routine Use of an On-Table Extubation Protocol in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery-Our Experience With Life in the Fast Lane.

Jothinath Kaushik, Raju Vijayakumar, Pavithra Ramanath, Murugesan Karthik Babu, Srinivasan Naveen, Janarthanan Maniyarasu, Michael E Nemergut, Joseph Dearani
{"title":"Routine Use of an On-Table Extubation Protocol in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery-Our Experience With Life in the Fast Lane.","authors":"Jothinath Kaushik, Raju Vijayakumar, Pavithra Ramanath, Murugesan Karthik Babu, Srinivasan Naveen, Janarthanan Maniyarasu, Michael E Nemergut, Joseph Dearani","doi":"10.1177/21501351241306032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWe undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy of an on-table extubation protocol and to assess the magnitude of benefits when implemented as a routine practice in a developing country.MethodsThis prospective observational study at a single tertiary care referral hospital was designed to determine the efficacy of an on-table extubation protocol when applied to children undergoing cardiac surgery in the developing world. The study included 226 patients who were 1 month to 18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery (including grown-up congenital heart disease [GUCHD] patients). Patients with RACHS score ≥ 4, neonates, preoperatively ventilated children, and emergency surgeries were excluded from the study. All pediatric elective cardiac surgical patients belonging to RACHS 1, 2, and 3 categories were considered as potential candidates for on-table extubation. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2020/07/026567).ResultsAmong the 226 children who underwent elective cardiac surgeries, we were able to extubate 142 patients (62.83%) in the operating room. This included 46.6% (54/116) infants, 80.8% (38/47) children less than 5 years of age, 79.3% (46/58) children between 5 years to 18 years age, and 80% (4/5) GUCHD. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and hospital cost were significantly less in the on-table extubation group (23 [20, 26] hours; 102 [97, 125] hours; INR 2,09,011 [181032, 244298]) as compared with those patients extubated in the ICU within 6 hours (28 [22, 46] hours; 122 [100, 168] hours; INR 2,25,430 [162203, 273831]) and beyond 6 hours (71 [45, 121] hours; 184 [127, 243] hours; INR 2,53,541 [226838, 306871]).ConclusionsThis protocol shows a significant reduction in ICU stay, hospital stay, and total hospital cost when compared with either extubation within 6 h in the ICU or delayed extubation (beyond 6 h) in patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94270,"journal":{"name":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","volume":" ","pages":"483-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351241306032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWe undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy of an on-table extubation protocol and to assess the magnitude of benefits when implemented as a routine practice in a developing country.MethodsThis prospective observational study at a single tertiary care referral hospital was designed to determine the efficacy of an on-table extubation protocol when applied to children undergoing cardiac surgery in the developing world. The study included 226 patients who were 1 month to 18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery (including grown-up congenital heart disease [GUCHD] patients). Patients with RACHS score ≥ 4, neonates, preoperatively ventilated children, and emergency surgeries were excluded from the study. All pediatric elective cardiac surgical patients belonging to RACHS 1, 2, and 3 categories were considered as potential candidates for on-table extubation. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2020/07/026567).ResultsAmong the 226 children who underwent elective cardiac surgeries, we were able to extubate 142 patients (62.83%) in the operating room. This included 46.6% (54/116) infants, 80.8% (38/47) children less than 5 years of age, 79.3% (46/58) children between 5 years to 18 years age, and 80% (4/5) GUCHD. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and hospital cost were significantly less in the on-table extubation group (23 [20, 26] hours; 102 [97, 125] hours; INR 2,09,011 [181032, 244298]) as compared with those patients extubated in the ICU within 6 hours (28 [22, 46] hours; 122 [100, 168] hours; INR 2,25,430 [162203, 273831]) and beyond 6 hours (71 [45, 121] hours; 184 [127, 243] hours; INR 2,53,541 [226838, 306871]).ConclusionsThis protocol shows a significant reduction in ICU stay, hospital stay, and total hospital cost when compared with either extubation within 6 h in the ICU or delayed extubation (beyond 6 h) in patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery.

在儿科心脏手术中常规使用桌上拔管方案-我们在快车道上的生活经验。
背景:我们进行了这项研究,以评估桌上拔管方案的有效性,并评估在发展中国家作为常规做法实施时的益处程度。方法:在一家三级转诊医院进行的这项前瞻性观察研究,旨在确定在发展中国家接受心脏手术的儿童中应用桌上拔管方案的有效性。该研究包括226例1个月至18岁接受心脏手术的患者(包括成人先天性心脏病患者)。排除RACHS评分≥4分的患者、新生儿、术前通气儿童及急诊手术患者。所有属于RACHS 1、2和3类的儿科选择性心脏手术患者都被认为是表上拔管的潜在候选人。试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI/2020/07/026567)。结果:226例接受择期心脏手术的患儿中,我们能够在手术室拔管142例(62.83%)。其中46.6%(54/116)为婴儿,80.8%(38/47)为5岁以下儿童,79.3%(46/58)为5 - 18岁儿童,80%(4/5)为GUCHD。表上拔管组重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、住院时间和住院费用均显著少于对照组(23[20,26]小时;102[97,125]小时;与6小时内拔管的患者相比(28[22,46]小时;122[100,168]小时;2,25,430[162203, 273831])和超过6小时(71[45,121]小时);184[127, 243]小时;印度卢比2,53,541[226838,306871])。结论:该方案显示,与接受儿科心脏手术的患者在ICU拔管6小时或延迟拔管(超过6小时)相比,ICU住院时间、住院时间和总住院费用均显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信