Mechanisms of Proactive Adaptation in a Rewarded Response Inhibition Task: Executive, Motor, or Attentional Effects?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Garance M Meyer, Maëlle Riou, Philippe Boulinguez, Guillaume Sescousse
{"title":"Mechanisms of Proactive Adaptation in a Rewarded Response Inhibition Task: Executive, Motor, or Attentional Effects?","authors":"Garance M Meyer, Maëlle Riou, Philippe Boulinguez, Guillaume Sescousse","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01269-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing number of studies have demonstrated the effects of reward motivation on inhibitory control performance. However, the exact neurocognitive mechanisms supporting these effects are not fully elucidated. In this preregistered study, we test the hypothesis that changes in speed-accuracy trade-off across contexts that alternatively incentivize fast responses versus accurate inhibition rely on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, a mechanism intended to lock movement initiation in anticipation of stimulus presentation. Thirty healthy participants performed a modified Go/NoGo task in which the motivation to prioritize Go vs. NoGo successes was manipulated using monetary rewards of different magnitudes. High-density EEG was recorded throughout the task. Source-space analyses were performed to track brain oscillatory activities consistent with proactive inhibitory control. We observed that participants adapted their behavior to the motivational context but found no evidence that this adaptation relied on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, hence failing to provide support for our pre-registered hypothesis. Unplanned analyses of brain-behavior relationships suggested an association between faster reaction times and enhanced top-down attention to the stimuli associated with larger rewards, as well as between increased commission error rates and stronger motor activations when Go stimuli were associated with larger rewards. The latter was related to inter-individual differences in trait reward responsiveness. These results highlight the need to carefully parse the different contributing mechanisms when studying the influence of reward motivation on inhibitory performance in impulsivity disorders. Exploratory results suggest alternative mechanisms that may be directly tested in further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01269-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing number of studies have demonstrated the effects of reward motivation on inhibitory control performance. However, the exact neurocognitive mechanisms supporting these effects are not fully elucidated. In this preregistered study, we test the hypothesis that changes in speed-accuracy trade-off across contexts that alternatively incentivize fast responses versus accurate inhibition rely on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, a mechanism intended to lock movement initiation in anticipation of stimulus presentation. Thirty healthy participants performed a modified Go/NoGo task in which the motivation to prioritize Go vs. NoGo successes was manipulated using monetary rewards of different magnitudes. High-density EEG was recorded throughout the task. Source-space analyses were performed to track brain oscillatory activities consistent with proactive inhibitory control. We observed that participants adapted their behavior to the motivational context but found no evidence that this adaptation relied on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, hence failing to provide support for our pre-registered hypothesis. Unplanned analyses of brain-behavior relationships suggested an association between faster reaction times and enhanced top-down attention to the stimuli associated with larger rewards, as well as between increased commission error rates and stronger motor activations when Go stimuli were associated with larger rewards. The latter was related to inter-individual differences in trait reward responsiveness. These results highlight the need to carefully parse the different contributing mechanisms when studying the influence of reward motivation on inhibitory performance in impulsivity disorders. Exploratory results suggest alternative mechanisms that may be directly tested in further studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信